<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[My Intel NIC only gets 100baseTX]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I'm using this NIC: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833106033 which appears to have an Intel 82574L Gigabit Ethernet Controller.  I'm running PFSense 2.0.2 (i386) nano edition.</p>
<p dir="auto">I've tried connecting it to two different gigabit switches and I'm using a brand new CAT 6 3' cable.  The current gigabit switch is connecting at 1000baseT/full duplex on other ports but not for my intel NIC, which is my PFSense -&gt; LAN adapter.</p>
<p dir="auto">I got a bit foolhardy and tried to look into it myself.  I noticed that in loader.conf it has this setting:</p>
<pre><code>if_em_load="NO"                 # Intel(R) PRO/1000 Gigabit Ethernet
</code></pre>
<p dir="auto">Should I change that to yes? Will that make FreeBSD automatically use the right driver?</p>
<p dir="auto">Edit: Oh yeah, the device is em0 so maybe it's already using that driver and it's complied in instead of loaded at boot time? I don't know what I'm doing, somebody lend me a hand before I do something dumb.  ;D</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/53428/my-intel-nic-only-gets-100basetx</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 12:59:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/53428.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:51:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My Intel NIC only gets 100baseTX on Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:04:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">:D<br />
Easy to overlook.  ;)</p>
<p dir="auto">Steve</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/381078</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/381078</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[stephenw10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:04:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My Intel NIC only gets 100baseTX on Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:23:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/stephenw10">@<bdi>stephenw10</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Ok so you've only tried one gigabit switch, tha Zyxel is only 10/100.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Well, this is embarrassing.  Thank you for your help.</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="http://static.divbyzero.nl/facepalm/doublefacepalm.jpg" alt="" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/381024</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/381024</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[vanguard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:23:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My Intel NIC only gets 100baseTX on Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:04:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Ok so you've only tried one gigabit switch, the Zyxel is only 10/100. You may have found some incompatibility between the two specific products at a hardware level. Try connecting any other gigabit device to it.</p>
<p dir="auto">That Intel chip is one of the most widely used and supported NICs you could buy. The recent EEPROM issue aside I don't think anyone here would have hesitated to recommend it.</p>
<p dir="auto">Steve</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/380960</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/380960</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[stephenw10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:04:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My Intel NIC only gets 100baseTX on Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:27:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/stephenw10">@<bdi>stephenw10</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">It should just work, I can see no reason why it wouldn't given what you have tried. Were the two switches you tried the same make/model?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">One switch was a 5 port dlink - http://www.amazon.com/D-Link-DGS-2205-5-Port-Desktop-Switch/dp/B000FIVDIA/ref=sr_1_9?s=electronics&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1361633564&amp;sr=1-9&amp;keywords=dlink+gigabit+switch</p>
<p dir="auto">The current switch is a 24 port zyxel.<br />
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005F4VYUG/ref=oh_details_o01_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1</p>
<p dir="auto">Everybody here seems to love the intel cards. Did I get the wrong intel NIC?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/380949</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/380949</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[vanguard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:27:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My Intel NIC only gets 100baseTX on Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:29:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/vanguard">@<bdi>vanguard</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">NEVER DO THAT!</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Ha!  ;) I feel your pain.</p>
<p dir="auto">What is the rest of your hardware?<br />
I note that this is the chip that recently hit the headlines as being <a href="http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,58615.0.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">compromised</a> by a badly programmed eeprom. I do not expect that to be an issue on Intel's own card though.</p>
<p dir="auto">It should just work, I can see no reason why it wouldn't given what you have tried. Were the two switches you tried the same make/model?</p>
<p dir="auto">If it's easy, given your other hardware, I would try booting a live Linux distro and checking the card functions correctly under that.</p>
<p dir="auto">Steve</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/380918</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/380918</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[stephenw10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:29:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My Intel NIC only gets 100baseTX on Sat, 23 Feb 2013 04:57:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/vanguard">@<bdi>vanguard</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Does anybody have a better idea?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">1. If your WAN speed is less than 101Mbps use the troublesome port as the WAN interface and use one of the working GigE ports as LAN.<br />
2. Use a pfSense 2.1 snapshot build since it will have much more up to date device drivers than the 2.0.x builds.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/380878</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/380878</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[wallabybob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 04:57:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My Intel NIC only gets 100baseTX on Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:37:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I tried changing this to 1000baseT full duplex.<br />
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/8LusDtm.png" alt="" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /><br />
NEVER DO THAT!  Ugh, I spent hours trying to get my NIC to work again. It's tough to figure out ifconfig when you don't have man pages or a net connection.  I eventually got it going from the command line then set it back via the web gui so it would work after a reboot.</p>
<p dir="auto">Does anybody have a better idea? It's not the cable and it's not the switch. Why can't I get 1000baseT?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/380869</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/380869</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[vanguard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 03:37:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My Intel NIC only gets 100baseTX on Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:07:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/fragged">@<bdi>fragged</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Have you tried a different cable? Does the LAN port work at GigE when plugged directly another PC with a gigabit NIC?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I've tried three cables, the most recent being a 3' CAT 6 cable that's brand new out of the box.  It shouldn't be the cable.</p>
<p dir="auto">I haven't tried it with another PC but I have tried it with two different gigabit switches.  Because I get the same issue with several cables and switches I'm pretty sure it's something to do with the PFSense setup.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/380790</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/380790</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[vanguard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:07:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My Intel NIC only gets 100baseTX on Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:57:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Have you tried a different cable? Does the LAN port work at GigE when plugged directly another PC with a gigabit NIC?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/380777</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/380777</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fragged]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:57:24 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>