<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Firewall Rule ID]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I am trying to figure out how to identify WHICH rule caused the action logged in the Firewall log.  I noticed that there is a blank "ID" column in the Firewall Rules tables, but I can't figure out how to set the ID nor is there a column for it in the log file.  As I recall, my old BSD firewall based on ipfw and bpf identified the rule number in the log to help determine which rule might be broken.</p>
<p dir="auto">Sorry if this is a noob question, perhaps my google-fu is not strong.</p>
<p dir="auto">Andrew</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/54688/firewall-rule-id</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 02:08:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/54688.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 22:19:50 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Firewall Rule ID on Fri, 29 Mar 2013 05:40:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks, I forgot to mention that I'm still running 2.0.1-RELEASE.  I'd like to upgrade to 2.1 and FreeBSD 8.3 but it was hard enough getting this installed on my headless Soekris box (a custom binary to boot with only a serial terminal).</p>
<p dir="auto">Andrew</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/387178</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/387178</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[andrewinhawaii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 05:40:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Firewall Rule ID on Fri, 29 Mar 2013 03:08:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">On 2.1-BETA1 the Firewall Log GUI display has options to show the rule number and the rule description - it makes it easy to see the reason for a block/reject/pass on a rule that is logged. I think that is new for 2.1.<br />
Others can comment on what is possible in 2.0.n, too long since I really used those versions :)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/387171</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/387171</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[phil.davis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 03:08:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>