Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Introducing Netgate Nexus: Multi-Instance Management at Your Fingertips.

    Multi-tenancy with high availability

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    5 Posts 4 Posters 1.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B Offline
      berocca
      last edited by

      We're considering pfSense for a multi-tenancy environment where each customer has a dedicated pfSense firewall. Any gotcha's to look out for?

      Also, each customer will need high availability. Is it possible to failover between pfSense firewalls running on different physical servers?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F Offline
        firewalluser
        last edited by

        You might want to check out the 2.1 Release candidates http://snapshots.pfsense.org/, there is a new menu option <system, high="" avail.="" sync="">which has a number of options that might meet your requirements.</system,>

        Capitalism, currently The World's best Entertainment Control System and YOU cant buy it! But you can buy this, or some of this or some of these

        Asch Conformity, mainly the blind leading the blind.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J Offline
          jasonlitka
          last edited by

          How exactly do you see this working?  Do you want two physical servers for each client or would a bunch of VMs suffice?  Is the entire thing going to be based on vLANs or are you going with physical separation of the networks?

          If VMs are OK, assuming the traffic isn't expected to be super high, I'd probably skip the built-in HA (CARP) in pfSense (it eats 3 IPs per interface vs 1 from a single box) and use Fault Tolerance across two boxes with vSphere.  That way there's a single image for the users to manage and they wouldn't even notice that they've failed over to backup hardware.

          I can break anything.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L Offline
            labasus
            last edited by

            Fault Tolerance in vSphere is limits your to use one virtual processor only.

            @Jason:

            …... and use Fault Tolerance across two boxes with vSphere.  ....

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              jasonlitka
              last edited by

              @labasus:

              Fault Tolerance in vSphere is limits your to use one virtual processor only.

              @Jason:

              …... and use Fault Tolerance across two boxes with vSphere.  ....

              Yes, that's true, but depending on the bandwidth & package requirements, that might be more than enough.

              I can break anything.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2026 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.