<![CDATA[[SOLVED] 2.1 release. Can you use URL_TABLE for alias?]]>Hi

I just want to ask if others have problems when using url_table for alias in 2.1-RELEASE? Same URL_TABLE works fine on 2.0.x

When I add a URL_TABLE this happens right after applying changes:

  • there seems not even to be added a table when looking at diagnostics->tables
  • traffic stops flowing through the pfsense but I can still access the router from LAN
  • the queues menu can not show any queues but list "No queue statistics could be read."

I can reproduce it as many times as I like on two boxes with this specs:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz
4 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s)

Running:
2.1-RELEASE (amd64)
built on Wed Sep 11 18:17:03 EDT 2013
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p11

Both have been upgraded from the RC to RELEASE

Before I reinstall the CF's with new images I would like to hear if this can be reproduced by someone else?

Alias with URL_TABLE is created like this:

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/61426/solved-2-1-release-can-you-use-url_table-for-aliasRSS for NodeSun, 12 Apr 2026 00:10:23 GMTMon, 07 Oct 2013 21:24:25 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to [SOLVED] 2.1 release. Can you use URL_TABLE for alias? on Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:51:33 GMT]]>It was my mistake…
I had an error in last row in the TXT with subnets for the alias. It did not mess up the 2.0.x boxes. Only the 2.1-release stopped working.

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/424295https://forum.netgate.com/post/424295Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:51:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to [SOLVED] 2.1 release. Can you use URL_TABLE for alias? on Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:48:06 GMT]]>Just tested a fresh install on different hardware. Same result. Guess it is a bug. I will open a bug and wait and see.

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/423605https://forum.netgate.com/post/423605Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:48:06 GMT