<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Does the VK-2D13 (ALIX.2D13) support VLAN Tagging?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I need to replace an old and dying P4 box with something a wee bit more efficient. I was looking at the VK-2D13 (ALIX.2D13) sold at the pfSense store. My question is does it support VLAN tagging? i.e. my current setup used one interface for the WAN and one interface for 4 tagged VLANS going to a smart switch. Will the ALIX board work for this? If not what alternative do you suggest?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/66037/does-the-vk-2d13-alix-2d13-support-vlan-tagging</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 11:03:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/66037.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:26:53 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does the VK-2D13 (ALIX.2D13) support VLAN Tagging? on Sun, 23 Feb 2014 06:05:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I had an Alix 2D13 running 2 WANs on the physical WAN port, by VLANs, 3 VLANs on the OPT1 port for various local subnets and the real LAN port being an ordinary LAN (I did that just so that I can always easily get to the webGUI by connecting physically to LAN, even if all the VLAN switch configs are gone).<br />
No trouble running VLANs on that.<br />
With multiple WANs I have trouble during failover - with 2.1.* at lot of stuff fires up at once failing over OpenVPN server/clients, doing DynDNS updates… and it sometimes runs out of the 256MB in real time. That means some process/es implementing the failover changes get killed, and so some things in the failover do not always implement. I believe this should be better in 2.2. Anyway, just saying that in a multi-WAN scenario on 2.1.* 256MB is not quite enough memory.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/445255</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/445255</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[phil.davis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2014 06:05:28 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>