<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[SNORT - Reverse , dnstunnel block help]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi all .<br />
Any one here got way to block reverse tunnell through http using pfsense ? and block dnstunnel using google as a relay . any one ?</p>
<p dir="auto">thanks .</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/70083/snort-reverse-dnstunnel-block-help</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 11:56:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/70083.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 07:32:08 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to SNORT - Reverse , dnstunnel block help on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:55:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/bbcan177">@<bdi>BBcan177</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I would suggest that you block all outgoing LAN DNS requests unless they are originating from your DNS Server(s) or pfSense DNS apps.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">This is a very effective way to handle the potential issue.  Restrict all LAN DNS traffic to just your internal DNS server (or servers), then further restrict outbound DNS (on WAN) to designated forwarders.</p>
<p dir="auto">There are some DNS policy rules in the Emerging Threats family that can help as well, but in my view the easiest method is restricting outbound DNS to only authorized hosts.</p>
<p dir="auto">Bill</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/466755</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/466755</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bmeeks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:55:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to SNORT - Reverse , dnstunnel block help on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:41:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">thanks ya  ;) ;)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/466617</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/466617</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[eznode]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:41:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to SNORT - Reverse , dnstunnel block help on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:56:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I would suggest that you block all outgoing LAN DNS requests unless they are originating from your DNS Server(s) or pfSense DNS apps.</p>
<p dir="auto">I think that Emerging Threats has a few rules for this, but I haven't looked into detail. I think they are looking for really long strings in the DNS traffic.</p>
<p dir="auto">Some links:</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/3206/do-you-detect-react-to-dns-tunnelling" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/3206/do-you-detect-react-to-dns-tunnelling</a></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/dns/detecting-dns-tunneling-34152" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">http://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/dns/detecting-dns-tunneling-34152</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/466606</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/466606</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[BBcan177]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:56:59 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>