<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Routing Problem.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Good afternoon staff,</p>
<p dir="auto">I have a problem internal routing here.<br />
I have 4 NICs, 2 WAN and LAN 2.<br />
The 2 networks typically browse the internet, but one can not get at the other.<br />
I have created the rule 2 interfaces LAN allowing access from 2 networks normally, but when I send a traceroute on my machine it can not get from one network to another.</p>
<p dir="auto">The two networks can reach pfSense without problem.</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/70109/routing-problem</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 19:50:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/70109.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:49:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Routing Problem. on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:40:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Rules 2 and 4 are never fired.  In general, pfSense rules apply to traffic coming IN (received by) an interface.  Unless you've got a very, very strange config, LAN1 will never see traffic coming into it with a LAN2-subnet source address.  Nor will LAN2 ever see traffic coming into it from a LAN1-subnet source address.</p>
<p dir="auto">They won't hurt anything but they're unnecessary and add clutter to the ruleset.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/467044</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/467044</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derelict]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:40:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Routing Problem. on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:20:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks for Reply.</p>
<p dir="auto">It's working now.<br />
I create this 2 rules and 2 more rules.</p>
<p dir="auto">–-&gt; create a firewall rule on LAN1: ALLOW PROTO:any SRC: lan1-subnet  DST: lan2-subnet<br />
---&gt; create a firewall rule on LAN1: ALLOW PROTO:any SRC: lan2-subnet  DST: lan1-subnet<br />
---&gt; create a firewall rule on LAN2: ALLOW PROTO:any SRC: lan2-subnet  DST: lan1-subnet<br />
---&gt; create a firewall rule on LAN2: ALLOW PROTO:any SRC: lan1-subnet  DST: lan2-subnet</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for the help!!!  ;)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/467042</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/467042</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[schimmelpfeng]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:20:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Routing Problem. on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:52:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">both LANs can get to the internet? But they can not contact  each other ?</p>
<p dir="auto">–-&gt; create a firewall rule on LAN1: ALLOW PROTO:any SRC: lan1-subnet  DST: lan2-subnet<br />
---&gt; create a firewall rule on LAN2: ALLOW PROTO:any SRC: lan2-subnet  DST: lan1-subnet</p>
<p dir="auto">But both rules on TOP of the rule list to start.  (you can experiment with lowering them afterwards)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/466624</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/466624</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[heper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:52:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>