<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Multi Wan Load Balance and NAT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello:</p>
<p dir="auto">I am trying to configure my router with multi-WAN load balance.</p>
<p dir="auto">My router (Pfsense 2.0) have two WAN interfaces with public ip's each one, and a third interface connected to the LAN with private address</p>
<p dir="auto">I want to nat my clients in the LAN, using the gateway group. I follow the next steps:</p>
<p dir="auto">1 - Configure the gateway group<br />
2 - Configure a DNS per gateway<br />
3 - Add a rule in the LAN interface with source my LAN subnet and the gateway group as the gateway for the rule.<br />
4 - Configure Automatic Outbound Nat</p>
<p dir="auto">But I check the ip of connections at https://www.pfsense.org/ip.php and always see the ip of the default gateway.  The ip never alternates.</p>
<p dir="auto">How is it supposed that Pfsense works with load balance and NAT? My guess is that Pfsense nat a connection with the ip of a gateway a time and then nat other connection with the ip of the other gateway next time. But I not sure, my config does not work in such way.</p>
<p dir="auto">Any help?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks</p>
<p dir="auto">PD: Sorry for my poor English</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/70224/multi-wan-load-balance-and-nat</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 10:16:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/70224.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 02:31:37 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Multi Wan Load Balance and NAT on Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:50:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">did you found solution about this?</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm also trying to configure a policy based routing with NAT but seems that if you apply a route-to to a flow, the NAT is not applied.</p>
<p dir="auto">Solutions?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/473545</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/473545</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sgala]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:50:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Multi Wan Load Balance and NAT on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:41:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Updated:</p>
<p dir="auto">2.1.3-RELEASE (i386)<br />
built on Thu May 01 15:52:17 EDT 2014<br />
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p16</p>
<p dir="auto">Attached screenshosts</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/public/_imported_attachments_/1/gateway-groups-config.png" alt="gateway-groups-config.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /><br />
<img src="/public/_imported_attachments_/1/gateway-groups-config.png_thumb" alt="gateway-groups-config.png_thumb" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /><br />
<img src="/public/_imported_attachments_/1/lan-firewall-rule.png" alt="lan-firewall-rule.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /><br />
<img src="/public/_imported_attachments_/1/lan-firewall-rule.png_thumb" alt="lan-firewall-rule.png_thumb" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/467187</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/467187</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[freax1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:41:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Multi Wan Load Balance and NAT on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:30:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">first of all, you'd better update to the latest stable version of pfSense.</p>
<p dir="auto">could you show us some screenshots of your gateway-group + firewall rules</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/467154</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/467154</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[heper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:30:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>