Performance? iperf measurements representative of real world data?

  • I used, until yesterday, an IPSec site to site link to tunnel just about all my traffic.
    Then I played with OpenVPN and did some performance testing with iperf :o

    iperf -c -i 10 -fK -n 1024M

    IPSec: (AES 256 GCM) [lower levels of encryption improve performance only marginally]

    [  3]  0.0-697.0 sec  1048576 KBytes  1504 KBytes/sec

    OpenVPN: (unencrypted)

    [  3]  0.0-221.8 sec  997888 KBytes  4500 KBytes/sec

    OpenVPN: (AES 128 CBC)

    [  3]  0.0-263.8 sec  857856 KBytes  3252 KBytes/sec


    • Does anyone know if iPerf just produces atypically compressible data, or is OpenVPN really THAT much faster?

    • What's the fastest/best performing compression? Don't really have any relevant unencrypted data on the link, since it's simply a routing tunnel, I just need things encrypted enough that some ISP doesn't get the idea to to do content filtering or stuff like that, so even a simple fixed-key XOR would be good enough, but the performance gains with the unencrypted link are inspiring…

    Still shocked by these numbers....

Log in to reply