<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[[2.2.1-DEVEL] filter_generate_port: 1194 is not a valid destination port]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">What's this noise supposed to mean?</p>
<pre><code>
Mar 5 21:25:32	php-fpm[63724]: /rc.filter_configure_sync: filter_generate_port: 1194 is not a valid destination port.
Mar 5 21:25:32	php-fpm[63724]: /rc.filter_configure_sync: filter_generate_port: 3493 is not a valid destination port.
Mar 5 21:25:32	php-fpm[63724]: /rc.filter_configure_sync: filter_generate_port: 1194 is not a valid destination port.
Mar 5 21:25:31	php-fpm[63724]: /rc.filter_configure_sync: filter_generate_port: 3493 is not a valid destination port.
Mar 5 21:25:30	check_reload_status: Reloading filter

</code></pre>
<p dir="auto">This is a fully gitsynced box with recent 2.2.1 snapshot. There's OpenVPN server running on port 1194, and there's a NAT rule for NUT on LAN.</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/SZxwnZj.png" alt="" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/80767/2-2-1-devel-filter_generate_port-1194-is-not-a-valid-destination-port</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:06:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/80767.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 20:39:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [2.2.1-DEVEL] filter_generate_port: 1194 is not a valid destination port on Fri, 06 Mar 2015 13:02:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Fixed, thanks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/525474</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/525474</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[doktornotor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 13:02:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [2.2.1-DEVEL] filter_generate_port: 1194 is not a valid destination port on Fri, 06 Mar 2015 05:03:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks for the catch doktornotor and Phil. I overlooked that when making the change to skip numeric-only alias names since those are no longer valid in the ruleset.</p>
<p dir="auto">I merged the pull request, next snapshot run will start in a bit.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/525402</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/525402</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cmb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 05:03:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [2.2.1-DEVEL] filter_generate_port: 1194 is not a valid destination port on Fri, 06 Mar 2015 04:32:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">And this should make it happier:<br />
<a href="https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/pull/1543" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/pull/1543</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/525399</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/525399</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[phil.davis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 04:32:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [2.2.1-DEVEL] filter_generate_port: 1194 is not a valid destination port on Fri, 06 Mar 2015 03:03:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">This extra validation in /etc/inc/util.inc function alias_expand($name) broke that:<br />
<a href="https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/9bfb45ab2810edd13c3799510f5d090d01f82791" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/9bfb45ab2810edd13c3799510f5d090d01f82791</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/525391</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/525391</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[phil.davis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 03:03:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>