<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Netgate APU4 throughput question]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello… I was looking at the Netgate APU4 and clicked on community support and it brought me here, so apologies if this is the wrong place.</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm trying to find throughput numbers on the netgate APU4...  currently I'm using Smoothwall on an old pentium level system and have hit a wall with my internet provider.  I recently moved to 50 Mbps service, but the max my firewall will push is about 25 Mbps.  I know this because if I remove the Smoothwall from the path I can hit 50 Mbps without issue.  But I can't seem to find any numbers on max throughput for the Netgate APU4 (on the store site it lists performance specs as "TBD."</p>
<p dir="auto">No SSL encryption or anything fancy...  I've been running smoothwall simply for the firewall and to manage things like DHCP/NTP for my home network.</p>
<p dir="auto">I did a search on "throughput" on the forums and it returned three topics I think, but didn't really go into what I was looking for.</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for any assistance.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/80830/netgate-apu4-throughput-question</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 05:32:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/80830.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 22:03:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Netgate APU4 throughput question on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:09:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have the APU1C on a Comcast 50/10 pipe.  Works like a charm, even with squid and an openVPN back to the office.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/540259</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/540259</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[almabes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:09:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Netgate APU4 throughput question on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:40:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I get a pretty firm max of 60MB/s  or ~500Mbps.</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm talking just NAT with factory defaults for testing, nothing fancy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/540244</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/540244</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[msmith9xr4]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:40:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Netgate APU4 throughput question on Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:41:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The AMD G-series CPU should be somewhat similar to T24L (quite popular for network appliance)<br />
According to securityrouter.org (which is OpenBSD based, so I guess this can be take as a reference) NAT performance allows you to do 922Mbps throughput.<br />
http://securityrouter.org/wiki/Performance</p>
<p dir="auto">Even someone may say pf(4) on FreeBSD is slower compared with OpenBSD, or hardware variation blah blah blah….putting a 50% performance penalty (which is not quite possible, right?) you would still get 460Mbps, more than enough for your applications. I believe even the slower Geode platform will suit your need.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/530810</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/530810</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[edwardwong]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:41:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Netgate APU4 throughput question on Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:47:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello,</p>
<p dir="auto">I consider the change to pfSense but not even to buy fast and wondering then after,<br />
so if you have enough time the brand new Soekris net6801 in Q4 this year (2015)<br />
would be also very interesting for many pfSense users.</p>
<p dir="auto">P.S.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">No SSL encryption or anything fancy…</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Then the APU would do the job also fine for you, if later something comes on top<br />
I would suggest perhaps to take the APU board with 4 GB, if not important 2 GB<br />
would do the job also fine.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/530756</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/530756</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:47:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Netgate APU4 throughput question on Fri, 06 Mar 2015 23:26:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Perfect!  Thank you very much…</p>
<p dir="auto">And there wasn't any smoothwall questions to answer  ;)  I was merely presenting the situation WHY I wanted to move to PFsense and the APU4 (because my Smoothwall was bottleknecking my internet).  Was hoping to find some specs on the APU4 before shelling out the $$$ to make the move  :D</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/525660</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/525660</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SingleA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 23:26:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Netgate APU4 throughput question on Fri, 06 Mar 2015 22:42:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Not the place for Smoothwall questions, but an APU4 should be fine for your needs. Running pfSense, people have gotten in excess of 300 Mbps. I could get 90 Mbps through the old Alix 2D13.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/525653</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/525653</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dotdash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 22:42:43 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>