<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Xeon E3-1220 vs Atom C2550]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Looking some opinions on the following two systems. I have an extra Supermicro X9SCM-F-O motherboard that I had planned to pair with a Celeron G1620 temporarily until Skylake Xeons come out and then I'll pass down my Xeon E3-1220 (Sandy Bridge).</p>
<p dir="auto">However, I've noticed the new Atom boards are very popular and have 4 port NIC built in. I'm considering selling the Xeon and X9 board and getting an Atom. Probably the A1SAM-2550F-O.</p>
<p dir="auto">Looking for some input on what to do.</p>
<p dir="auto">My internet is only 100/10 cable but want to be ready for gigabit when it's available.<br />
I don't know anything about packages but I see Snort and Squid mentioned a lot. I want enough headroom to run anything I want.<br />
This is for my home, probably max of 10-15 clients at any given time.<br />
Either way, chassis will likely be a 2U Norco and 430 watt PSU I already have.<br />
This server will be bare metal with the sole purpose for running pfsense.<br />
Right now plan to use my existing 48 port HP 1910 switch and convert my Apple AirPort Extreme to wireless access point.</p>
<p dir="auto">I know the Xeon is about 4 times faster overall but it also uses more power and I'd have to add a NIC.</p>
<p dir="auto">Opinions? Thanks  :)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/88512/xeon-e3-1220-vs-atom-c2550</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 10:16:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/88512.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:09:35 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Xeon E3-1220 vs Atom C2550 on Wed, 02 Sep 2015 05:30:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Yes it's overkill and more power but it gives me more options</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">For sure it will! You will be able to run all packages you want and with a sufficient<br />
SSD drive this will be a really hardcore pfSense box! You can be;</p>
<ul>
<li>under performed = nothing goes</li>
<li>right performed = all goes but with small or no headroom</li>
<li>over performed = likes "right performed" but for a longer time of usage</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">What's a good Intel quad NIC? I see a lot on eBay, some Dell branded, etc.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Intel NICs would be the best choice!<br />
<a href="https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=98832.0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">$18.99 Intel i350-T4</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/568186</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/568186</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 05:30:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Xeon E3-1220 vs Atom C2550 on Wed, 02 Sep 2015 02:20:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks for the input. My budget for the board and CPU is around $250. I'm leaning towards the Xeon combo since I already have it and it's hard to trade for a system that's 1/4 as fast. Yes it's overkill and more power but it gives me more options and I doubt the power usage will make much of a difference when running at idle most of the time.</p>
<p dir="auto">What's a good Intel quad NIC? I see a lot on eBay, some Dell branded, etc.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/568169</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/568169</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 02:20:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Xeon E3-1220 vs Atom C2550 on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 09:59:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Looking some opinions on the following two systems. I have an extra Supermicro X9SCM-F-O motherboard that I had planned to pair with a Celeron G1620 temporarily until Skylake Xeons come out and then I'll pass down my Xeon E3-1220 (Sandy Bridge).</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">At these days nothing beats an Intel Xeon CPU! But it is also sucking much power and only for 15 users<br />
it would perhaps to much power usage, but compared to all other CPUs the Xeon is a real king!</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">However, I've noticed the new Atom boards are very popular and have 4 port NIC built in.<br />
I'm considering selling the Xeon and X9 board and getting an Atom. Probably the A1SAM-2550F-O.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I would more like to go with the SUPERMICRO A1SRI-2758F (C2758) if you want to go by the mini ITX format<br />
and a SC101i or M350 case, but if you are looking more for a 1U appliance I would have a closer look at the<br />
Supermicro A1SRM-LN7F-2758 (C2758) with 7 GB LAN Ports and a mSATA slot on board!</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Looking for some input on what to do.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Than let us talk at first about your budget please.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">My internet is only 100/10 cable but want to be ready for gigabit when it's available.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">All named boards above are able to serve this line.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I don't know anything about packages but I see Snort and Squid mentioned a lot. I want enough headroom to run anything I want.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Than perhaps the Atom C2758 instead of the C2750 platform?</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">This is for my home, probably max of 10-15 clients at any given time.<br />
Either way, chassis will likely be a 2U Norco and 430 watt PSU I already have.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">To much power consuming, not the system itself but the electric power consuming is the point.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">This server will be bare metal with the sole purpose for running pfsense.<br />
Right now plan to use my existing 48 port HP 1910 switch and convert my Apple AirPort Extreme to wireless access point.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Ok then the Supermicro boards are fitting really good, otherwise the pfSense store offers also SG-xxxx units<br />
that comes with 3 miniPCIe slots for modem, WiFi and mSATA cards that could also fits your needs.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I know the Xeon is about 4 times faster overall but it also uses more power and I'd have to add a NIC.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">For sure but a used Intel Quad GB LAN Port card is only at ~$60 and the Xeon is a real king, nothing<br />
betas him, as I see it right. Capable to do all you want.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/567991</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/567991</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 09:59:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Xeon E3-1220 vs Atom C2550 on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:55:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I would sell the E3-1220 and go for the other package. Its going to be fine for handling what you need at home presumably (unless you're doing a lot of cross subnet traffic at 1Gbit)</p>
<p dir="auto">The E3-1220 is total overkill, total….</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/567904</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/567904</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[arduino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:55:01 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>