<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Multi-wan: how to force one lan ip to avoid LB and use only a single wan?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">I have a multi-wan setup.  so my base IPv4 rule is directed to an LB gateway.  However,  I have a single computer on my lan that needs to not have it's connections load balanced.  I want to create rules to force it's traffic both in/out to be on wan1.</p>
<p dir="auto">I already created a Lan rule at the top where source is a 'single host' set to the machines IP.  And I've set the gateway to wan1.</p>
<p dir="auto">But I'm confused how to set the wan1 / wan2 rules to accomplish this?  Is this the right way to do this?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/88563/multi-wan-how-to-force-one-lan-ip-to-avoid-lb-and-use-only-a-single-wan</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 19:26:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/88563.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:59:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Multi-wan: how to force one lan ip to avoid LB and use only a single wan? on Sat, 05 Sep 2015 01:03:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have the exact same setup because one of my servers must use one outgoing WAN from a different LAN.</p>
<p dir="auto">See enclosed screen shots, and the server is 10.0.1.240.</p>
<p dir="auto">The gateways only fail in one direction, and I have outbound NAT defined too.</p>
<p dir="auto">![Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 9.01.02 PM.png](/public/<em>imported_attachments</em>/1/Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 9.01.02 PM.png)<br />
![Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 9.01.02 PM.png_thumb](/public/<em>imported_attachments</em>/1/Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 9.01.02 PM.png_thumb)<br />
![Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 9.00.42 PM.png](/public/<em>imported_attachments</em>/1/Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 9.00.42 PM.png)<br />
![Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 9.00.42 PM.png_thumb](/public/<em>imported_attachments</em>/1/Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 9.00.42 PM.png_thumb)<br />
![Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 9.02.05 PM.png](/public/<em>imported_attachments</em>/1/Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 9.02.05 PM.png)<br />
![Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 9.02.05 PM.png_thumb](/public/<em>imported_attachments</em>/1/Screen Shot 2015-09-04 at 9.02.05 PM.png_thumb)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/568774</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/568774</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tim.mcmanus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 01:03:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Multi-wan: how to force one lan ip to avoid LB and use only a single wan? on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 22:31:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">For outbound connections you need no rules on WAN1/WAN2.</p>
<p dir="auto">If you have connections coming inbound and port forwarded/1:1NAT to the host, you would control which WAN gets the traffic with DNS entries. (The connections go to the WAN whose address is in the A record.)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/568134</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/568134</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derelict]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 22:31:40 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>