<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Will this work for 1Gb Support?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Looking for a box to support my current 300Mbps service and upcoming Google Fiber. Will this work with 8Gb of RAM?</p>
<p dir="auto">http://www.amazon.com/Jetway-NF9HG-2930-Intel-Celeron-Fanless/dp/B00XO9QUJ4/ref=sr_1_6?s=pc&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1447433866&amp;sr=1-6&amp;keywords=jetway</p>
<p dir="auto">I know pfSense makes their own hardware but from the reviews I've read, the jury is still out on if it will support 1Gb of throughput.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/91661/will-this-work-for-1gb-support</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 22:07:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/91661.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:20:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Will this work for 1Gb Support? on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:16:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks for your help. I went with system I posted above and added a 32GB SSD and 8GB of RAM. I ended up buying it directly from MITXPC vs. Amazon. Looking forward to getting it.</p>
<p dir="auto">I noticed in your CPU comparison, you didn't specific the Celeron N2930. Where does that fit in the list?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/583958</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/583958</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[djseto]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:16:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Will this work for 1Gb Support? on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:30:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for your reply. This will mainly be used to support Firewall, IPS/IDS (snort), and VPN. For VPN, I will maintain a constant site-to-site VPN to a public cloud (but there will be very little traffic flow) and then occasional VPN access for myself when I'm out on public Wifi.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">No problems at all.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Given that the cost is comparable between building a box using this Jetway configuration vs. the pfSense 2440, I'm guessing building my own would yield a better box?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Not so easy to answer, because the SG units are all coming beside with AES-NI and Intel QuickAssist and the<br />
Jetway box is not capable of this both features or support them.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I'm way out of the loop on Intel CPU's these days so I have no idea how Atoms compare against Celerons, Pentiums (they brought that name back?!), and Core processors for this type of application workload.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Intel Celeron J1900<br />
Intel Celeron G3260T<br />
Intel Atom C2x58 SoCs<br />
Intel Core i3 or Core i5 @3,0GHz+ and AES-NI support<br />
Intel Xeon D-15x0<br />
Intel Xeon E3-12xxv3/v4</p>
<p dir="auto">This would be nearly a comparsion from the lowest bottom to the highest top, for sure others<br />
would be tending to other CPUs or SoCs but this would be my setup to building a more or less<br />
powerful pfSense box, also with a viewing eye to the electric power consumption.</p>
<p dir="auto">But with the Jetway box and 4 GB - 8 GB and a mSATA it would be enough power to run all this<br />
things smooth and liquid.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/583935</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/583935</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:30:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Will this work for 1Gb Support? on Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:31:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks for your reply. This will mainly be used to support Firewall, IPS/IDS (snort), and VPN. For VPN, I will maintain a constant site-to-site VPN to a public cloud (but there will be very little traffic flow) and then occasional VPN access for myself when I'm out on public Wifi.</p>
<p dir="auto">Given that the cost is comparable between building a box using this Jetway configuration vs. the pfSense 2440, I'm guessing building my own would yield a better box? I'm way out of the loop on Intel CPU's these days so I have no idea how Atoms compare against Celerons, Pentiums (they brought that name back?!), and Core processors for this type of application workload.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/583834</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/583834</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[djseto]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:31:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Will this work for 1Gb Support? on Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:43:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Looking for a box to support my current 300Mbps service and upcoming Google Fiber. Will this work with 8Gb of RAM?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">It will be enough for 1 GBit/s on WAN and Snort on top and yes for sure it will be able to<br />
run with 8 GB and a mSATA.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I know pfSense makes their own hardware but from the reviews I've read, the jury is still out on if it will support 1Gb of throughput.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Their hardware will do for sure routing 1 GBit/s on the WAN, but not even with a pppoe account<br />
together but still with a static IP on the WAN port. And this is all pending on what hardware you<br />
are taking from them! The XG-1540 will be pretty able to route the 1 GBit/s for sure also with pppoe<br />
together.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/583822</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/583822</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:43:25 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>