<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Traffic shaping - one WAN, two LANs]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,<br />
i'm totally in  pfsense and don't know how to setup the traffic shaping for my network.</p>
<p dir="auto">My setup is a WAN connection with 6Mbit/s and two LANs (guest+private).<br />
I want to setup the traffic shaper, my private LAN should always have the higher priority and should be able to use 90% of the WAN bandwidth every time.<br />
The guest-LAN should also be able to use 90% of the WAN bandwidth, but only when my private LAN is not using the WAN bandwidth.<br />
What kind of shaping thing is that?<br />
Is it PRIQ or CBQ?<br />
How should I start doing this?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks a lot for your help!</p>
<p dir="auto">Jonas</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/94728/traffic-shaping-one-wan-two-lans</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 05:57:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/94728.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:02:52 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Traffic shaping - one WAN, two LANs on Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:20:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/pteek">@<bdi>pteek</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">pfSense + a managed switch.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">How will this work?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">You can search for other posts on the topic. I have no actual experience in this area.</p>
<p dir="auto">I would assume that you would shape the traffic by IP/port on a single interface within pfSense, then the managed switch would split it off into the seperate LANs.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/601438</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/601438</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nullity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:20:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Traffic shaping - one WAN, two LANs on Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:03:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">pfSense + a managed switch.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">How will this work?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/601436</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/601436</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pteek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:03:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Traffic shaping - one WAN, two LANs on Wed, 03 Feb 2016 20:14:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Currently, you cannot fairly share bandwidth between multiple interfaces. You could set one LAN interface with a bandwidth limit of 50% so that the other LAN will always have 50% available.</p>
<p dir="auto">You can accomplish your goal of <strong>fair</strong> sharing (meaning both interfaces can fully utilize all unused bandwidth) but you need to use two instances of pfSense or pfSense + a managed switch.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/600396</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/600396</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nullity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 20:14:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Traffic shaping - one WAN, two LANs on Wed, 03 Feb 2016 18:53:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">any Idea?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/600384</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/600384</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[joke24]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 18:53:36 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>