<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The forum header should have the same theme as the pfsense logo on the router.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">What do you think about that ?</p>
<p dir="auto">Now we have a black background with black letter… to keep everything the same, the forum should be black background with white letter :)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/99024/the-forum-header-should-have-the-same-theme-as-the-pfsense-logo-on-the-router</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 10:01:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/99024.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 05:00:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The forum header should have the same theme as the pfsense logo on the router. on Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:36:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">People tend to react against change. IIRC something with Newton's 3rd law</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">The other famous quote that could be applied in this particular case: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"</p>
<p dir="auto">I do like the general concept of keeping the forum and product "in sync" as far as look and feel.</p>
<p dir="auto">The problem for me is that I personally find the White on Black format harder on the eyes.</p>
<p dir="auto">For pfSense:the product I can set up the themes the way it works best for me and carry on.<br />
For pfSense:the Forum, presumably we're all stuck with whatever format gets picked as the consensus.</p>
<p dir="auto">Unless there's an option to change the forum "theme" to what you personally prefer (translate: what's easier on your eyes) I vote, leave well enough alone.</p>
<p dir="auto">Just my $.02</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/620934</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/620934</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[divsys]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:36:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The forum header should have the same theme as the pfsense logo on the router. on Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:55:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">+1 for me, though absolutely no priority.</p>
<p dir="auto">One of the impressive things was (is) the coherence/harmony between product and forum.<br />
The product is nice &amp; interesting, so are the (most) people here.<br />
Same goes for the style, it was stretched from firewall gui to forum.</p>
<p dir="auto">People tend to react against change. IIRC something with Newton's 3rd law  ;D</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/620886</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/620886</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bennyc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:55:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The forum header should have the same theme as the pfsense logo on the router. on Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:21:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">NO thanks, I vote leave the forum alone…...</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/620222</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/620222</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[divsys]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:21:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>