$50 for tftp-server-name DHCP option

[databeestje]

Weird thought, make it available as a advanced option and hide it behind a advanced button.

That appears to work really well for current code in RELENG_1

[dave99]

Was there ever a final resolution on this? If so, what is the proper format for the config.xml & services.inc file. I tried all the variations I could find, none seemed to work with my cisco phones.

[databeestje]

I would like to claim the bounty.

It's added to both RELENG_1 and HEAD.

It should be on the services_dhcp.php page.

It will be hidden behind a "advanced" button.
seth.mos@xs4all.nl for paypal

[Berg]

Hello,

I just completed a search for "option 66" to see if PFSense supported it and came upon this post.

I too would use this for an Asterisk system.

What is the status of this initiative ? Is anyone else looking for this ? Is anyone using this now ?

TIA.

[ben.suffolk]

@sullrich:

This has been commited to -HEAD.

I'm still a little unsure of your release processes, when will a commit to HEAD (from May 2006) make it into a snapshot, or an actual release?

I had a look in the code from 1.2-BETA-1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-06-04-2007 but its not in there.

Regards

Ben

[dotdash]

AFAIK, there is no set schedule for HEAD features getting into release.
However, it should have hit RELENG_1. Perhaps no one ponied up the bounty…
@databeestje:

I would like to claim the bounty.

It's added to both RELENG_1 and HEAD.

It should be on the services_dhcp.php page.

It will be hidden behind a "advanced" button.
seth.mos@xs4all.nl for paypal

[ben.suffolk]

@dotdash:

AFAIK, there is no set schedule for HEAD features getting into release.
However, it should have hit RELENG_1. Perhaps no one ponied up the bounty…

That bit by databeestje confused me a bit because the bounty had already been claimed previously :

@cayblood:

This bounty has been claimed by Daniel S. Haischt, who sent us some patched files, from which we were able to create a modification with a more minimal impact.

Regards

Ben

[dotdash]

My understanding was that DSH was no longer coding for the project. See here:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2824.msg22987.html#msg22987
I think that's why Seth was completing the work.

[DanielSHaischt]

@dotdash:

My understanding was that DSH was no longer coding for the project. See here:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2824.msg22987.html#msg22987
I think that's why Seth was completing the work.

@dotdash
Don't spread false rumors. And yes the bounty was already claimed and I am not sure whether the bounty author is willing to pay twice.

Cheers
Daniel S. Haischt

[dotdash]

Sorry, meant no offense. Was just trying to figure out where this went, as the thread is a bit confusing. It says it was added to release, but doesn't appear in recent snapshots. I was just speculating as to why it looked like there had been multiple people working on this. Again, sorry that my wild speculation was off-base.
Re-reading it does say clearly that the bounty was claimed and the changes were added to head.