Categories

  • 469 Topics
    1k Posts
    P
    We’re excited to announce the release of Netgate TNSR 25.10, our latest update packed with powerful new features, expanded capabilities, and over 35 bug fixes and enhancements. What’s New in version 25.10? VPF NAT Endpoint-Independent Mode - useful in large scale CGNAT scenarios VPF NAT Source-IP Hash Mode - improves behavior for protocols such as SIP VPF NAT Rule Port Ranges - dedicate outbound source port ranges different tenants VPF Filter Port Tables - define groupings of IP services ports into a VPF table WireGuard FQDN Peer Configuration - configure peers using FQDNs Legacy Dataplane NAT Removed - Legacy Dataplane NAT functionality has been removed. If you are still using legacy dataplane NAT, please convert to VPF NAT before updating to this version. Release Notes: https://docs.netgate.com/tnsr/en/latest/releases/release-notes-25.10.html Blog Post: https://www.netgate.com/blog/netgate-releases-tnsr-software-version-25.10 Video: https://youtu.be/EH1qUcsZ8do
  • 121k Topics
    771k Posts
    dennypageD
    I gave 25.11-RC a run. Unfortunately I had to roll back due to an issue with name resolution for DHCPv6 addresses. I have 40-45 active IPv6 leases that should be registered via Kea, however none were available via unbound. Oddly there was one registration with unbound that kinda came through, but the domain name portion was incorrect. The rest were all missing. FWIW, I checked the files, and the Kea registrations are there, the hosts are getting their addresses, however the addresses are just not being synced with Unbound. Please let me know what information I can provide to assist in narrowing the issue.
  • 20k Topics
    128k Posts
    C
    For what it’s worth, we may have had the same issue but for different reasons. I checked, and my system has the duplicate two files. Therefore, I asked Grok.ai about “/usr/local/etc/rc.d/pfsense_tailscaled enable /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tailscaled disable” versus the solution it had provided me yesterday. See the answer below. (Grok.ai used sources that included this Netgate forum, Lawrence Systems Forums – Networking & Firewalls, and https://forum.tailscale.com/.) The Two Service Files: Quick Breakdown Before diving into the relation, let’s clarify what those files are (based on standard pfSense Tailscale package behavior on 25.07.x/FreeBSD 15-CURRENT): • /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tailscaled: This is the generic FreeBSD/Tailscale rc.d script. It originates from the underlying tailscale package (the one you manually installed via' pkg add' for version 1.90.6). It’s a basic daemon starter/stopper that just runs /usr/local/bin/tailscaled without any pfSense-specific smarts (e.g., no auto-auth, no route advertising, no GUI integration). • /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pfsense_tailscaled: This is the pfSense-specific wrapper script. It’s installed by the official pfSense-pkg-Tailscale package. It wraps the generic tailscaled binary but adds pfSense magic: it reads your GUI config (auth key, advertised routes, exit node flags), writes them to /usr/local/etc/rc.conf.d/pfsense_tailscaled (e.g., pfsense_tailscaled_authkey="yourkey"), and handles the full tailscale up with flags on boot. It’s what makes the service “pfSense-aware.” In a stock official package install (without your manual binary upgrade), only pfsense_tailscaled exists and runs everything. When you force-installed the newer tailscale pkg on top, it added the generic tailscaled script as a side effect—but your fixed script (the one we pasted into /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tailscaled) overrode it to behave correctly.
  • 43k Topics
    267k Posts
    perikoP
    @gaxiolamx Quien es tu monitor en tus gw's?
  • Information about hardware available from Netgate

    3k Topics
    21k Posts
    stephenw10S
    It would only be there if it was actually an SA which is unlikely for a BIOS update. I have the netgate blog page added to the RSS dashboard widget to see updates there.
  • Information about hardware available from Netgate

    44 Topics
    211 Posts
    AriKellyA
    It looks like unified web management could be coming soon. It would be great if it means easier control and management of all web services in one place. Let's see if any companies announce more details about it!
  • Feel free to talk about anything and everything here

    4k Topics
    19k Posts
    tinfoilmattT
    @SteveITS Possibly something with that ESMTPSA > SMTP > ESMTPS. But yeah, who knows.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.