• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

DNS and DHCP -> using different domains for each network - Bug #1819 - $150

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Bounties
40 Posts 21 Posters 14.8k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C
    CubedRoot
    last edited by Feb 3, 2018, 7:49 AM

    Found another Thread with a user experiencing the same type of issue:

    https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=122409.msg676047#msg676047

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • M
      miken32
      last edited by Feb 8, 2018, 9:46 PM

      @CubedRoot:

      Found another Thread with a user experiencing the same type of issue:

      https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=122409.msg676047#msg676047

      So say you have DHCP servers on LAN and OPT1, with domains in the DHCP server set as lan.internal and opt1.internal, and the domain in general settings is pfsense.internal. Your problem is that DHCP clients are being registered on the pfSense's internal DNS as pc1.pfsense.internal instead of pc1.lan.internal?

      (Important to note that the domain in DHCP is only intended for searches. So if you run ping foo you're going to ping either foo.lan.internal or foo.opt1.internal. It's working fine, you're just looking for it to do more than it currently is.)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        CubedRoot
        last edited by Mar 12, 2018, 4:04 AM

        @miken32:

        @CubedRoot:

        Found another Thread with a user experiencing the same type of issue:

        https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=122409.msg676047#msg676047

        So say you have DHCP servers on LAN and OPT1, with domains in the DHCP server set as lan.internal and opt1.internal, and the domain in general settings is pfsense.internal. Your problem is that DHCP clients are being registered on the pfSense's internal DNS as pc1.pfsense.internal instead of pc1.lan.internal?

        (Important to note that the domain in DHCP is only intended for searches. So if you run ping foo you're going to ping either foo.lan.internal or foo.opt1.internal. It's working fine, you're just looking for it to do more than it currently is.)

        Yes, whatever domain is set in the general settings of pfSense, that is the domain that DHCP clients will get assigned to them.  I am looking for the ability to have the DHCP server assign (and register correctly with the pfSense DNS) a completely different domain per network (LAN, vLan, etc).

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          miken32
          last edited by Mar 22, 2018, 9:06 PM

          @CubedRoot:

          @miken32:

          @CubedRoot:

          Found another Thread with a user experiencing the same type of issue:

          https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=122409.msg676047#msg676047

          So say you have DHCP servers on LAN and OPT1, with domains in the DHCP server set as lan.internal and opt1.internal, and the domain in general settings is pfsense.internal. Your problem is that DHCP clients are being registered on the pfSense's internal DNS as pc1.pfsense.internal instead of pc1.lan.internal?

          (Important to note that the domain in DHCP is only intended for searches. So if you run ping foo you're going to ping either foo.lan.internal or foo.opt1.internal. It's working fine, you're just looking for it to do more than it currently is.)

          Yes, whatever domain is set in the general settings of pfSense, that is the domain that DHCP clients will get assigned to them.  I am looking for the ability to have the DHCP server assign (and register correctly with the pfSense DNS) a completely different domain per network (LAN, vLan, etc).

          Isn't that what the "DDNS Domain" option is for?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            dpsi
            last edited by Apr 15, 2018, 10:08 PM

            @miken32:

            @CubedRoot:

            @miken32:

            @CubedRoot:

            Found another Thread with a user experiencing the same type of issue:

            https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=122409.msg676047#msg676047

            So say you have DHCP servers on LAN and OPT1, with domains in the DHCP server set as lan.internal and opt1.internal, and the domain in general settings is pfsense.internal. Your problem is that DHCP clients are being registered on the pfSense's internal DNS as pc1.pfsense.internal instead of pc1.lan.internal?

            (Important to note that the domain in DHCP is only intended for searches. So if you run ping foo you're going to ping either foo.lan.internal or foo.opt1.internal. It's working fine, you're just looking for it to do more than it currently is.)

            Yes, whatever domain is set in the general settings of pfSense, that is the domain that DHCP clients will get assigned to them.  I am looking for the ability to have the DHCP server assign (and register correctly with the pfSense DNS) a completely different domain per network (LAN, vLan, etc).

            Isn't that what the "DDNS Domain" option is for?

            Can you show us how to let the DNS Resolver or Forwarder to give a key to allow the zones to be updated?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              dpsi
              last edited by Apr 15, 2018, 11:26 PM

              I am not a php developer, but I think I have figured out where the change needs to be.
              https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/blob/0a031fc76cdf0070db61ef93e1ccd692e9223cfa/src/etc/inc/system.inc#L635

              mwexec("/usr/local/sbin/dhcpleases -l {$g['dhcpd_chroot_path']}/var/db/dhcpd.leases -d {$config['system']['domain']} -p {$g['varrun_path']}/{$dns_pid} {$unbound_conf} -h {$g['etc_path']}/hosts");
              

              When the leases are being given, the command is hardcoded to use the system domain when writing to the resolver/forwarder dhcp entries list.
              Again, I am not a php dev, but it seems that if we could change the -d option then the correct domain will be given to dhcpleases. However, due to the way these are generated, it seems there can only ever be 1 domain. The dhcpd leases file holds ALL leases, not per interface. So either we need a different way to get the leases from dhcpd, or a different way to generate the domains.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                last edited by Apr 16, 2018, 2:30 AM

                I think there is some misconception here about what the domain-name parameter (Option 15) is supposed to do.

                It sets the DNS domain as opposed to the DNS search list set by the domain-search parameter (Option 119).

                There is also the host-name parameter (Option 12) that can be used to set the host name. According to my research this parameter is only really effective if configuring a system at boot - such as in conjunction with PXE.

                macOS 10.13.3 does not request that the server respond with option 12 - at least when it renews. The server, as expected, does not respond with an Option 12 setting.

                From the dhcpd.conf man page:

                It should be noted here that most DHCP clients completely ignore the host-name option sent by the DHCP server, and there is no way to configure them not to do this. So you generally have a choice of either not having any hostname to client IP address mapping that the client will recognize, or doing DNS updates. It is beyond the scope of this document to describe how to make this determination.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G
                  glego
                  last edited by May 8, 2018, 9:50 PM

                  @ Derelict,

                  I agree that dhcpd is not designed to fulfil the requirement. The issue is that ubound is registering all dhcpd leases under the same general domain name (see DHCP Registration).

                  The community (and me), would like to see an option where ubound takes the dhcpd domain-name parameter (Option 15) instead of the System > General Setup > Domain Name.

                  DHCP Registration

                  Register DHCP leases in the DNS Resolver
                  If this option is set, then machines that specify their hostname when requesting a DHCP lease will be registered in the DNS Resolver, so that their name can be resolved. The domain in System > General Setup should also be set to the proper value.
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    CubedRoot
                    last edited by Sep 30, 2018, 4:56 AM

                    Looks like this was pushed out to 2.4.5.

                    Bounty is still out there.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      snow
                      last edited by snow Nov 23, 2018, 3:29 PM Nov 23, 2018, 3:28 PM

                      @CubedRoot

                      I agree with you, same issue on my side with different dns domains on different vlan interfaces and I hope there will be an option available in an upcoming version.
                      As a workaround you can set static dhcp mappings, it's not comfortable but it's working;)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        CubedRoot
                        last edited by Nov 23, 2018, 5:06 PM

                        Yeah, I am using static mappings, but it is painful. I have even considered kicking the bounty up a little, but not sure what it'd take to get some traction.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          stevenb
                          last edited by stevenb Jul 5, 2019, 4:15 AM Jul 5, 2019, 4:15 AM

                          I've also run into this issue.

                          In digging, I believe the main fix for this needs to be added to the dhcpleases support app.

                          https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/blob/ea7549839ac5657e8d1f119ff45a79b7682cc97e/sysutils/dhcpleases/files/dhcpleases.c

                          While I can understand the main gist of the code that is there, I don't rate my coding skills in C that highly. I'm not sure I have enough time to try and polish them up to get this done.

                          How I would go about fixing it would be to create a new function in that utility which reads in the dhcpd config file and parses it into a list of IP pools and their DNS domain setting (if set). Then, when an individual DHCP lease is parsed, the code should loop over the list of IP pools and find the pool it belongs to and then attach the corresponding DNS domain, if there is one, instead of the default domain_suffix.

                          In PHP you have access to the DHCP pool information through the pfSense config data, however this utility needs to pull it from somewhere and I think the best place might be the dhcpd.conf file. I could be wrong, but the dhcpleases app looks to be restarted whenever the dhcp server is restarted, so the dhcp.conf config data should be able to just parsed in once at the start.

                          Most of the time would be spent writing a parser for the dhcpd.conf to bring in the required information.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            crond
                            last edited by Sep 23, 2019, 5:16 AM

                            Just curious why does it take 8 years to resolve this bug ?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              CubedRoot
                              last edited by Sep 23, 2019, 6:05 AM

                              The only thing I know to do is just keep pinging them here and in the red mine issue here. https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1819

                              C 1 Reply Last reply Sep 23, 2019, 6:29 PM Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                                last edited by Sep 23, 2019, 11:21 AM

                                If the pfSense DHCP server does not meet your needs use a different DHCP server.

                                C C 2 Replies Last reply Sep 23, 2019, 1:26 PM Reply Quote 1
                                • C
                                  CubedRoot @Derelict
                                  last edited by Sep 23, 2019, 1:26 PM

                                  @Derelict said in DNS and DHCP -> using different domains for each network - Bug #1819 - $150:

                                  If the pfSense DHCP server does not meet your needs use a different DHCP server.

                                  Wow, that's a pretty crummy answer. Sadly I am having to use a different DHCP server because pfSense has neglected this 8 year old bug. This sort of shows the attitude of the "new pfsense' since the whole negate change a few years back.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • C
                                    crond @CubedRoot
                                    last edited by crond Sep 23, 2019, 6:29 PM Sep 23, 2019, 6:29 PM

                                    @CubedRoot yeah run in the same problem during evaluation and after googling was surprise to find that it's been reported 8years ago.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • C
                                      crond @Derelict
                                      last edited by Sep 23, 2019, 6:56 PM

                                      @Derelict Thank you for such comprehensive answer, it really helps to understand complexity of the problem on netgate side and timeline for resolution.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • D
                                        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                                        last edited by Derelict Aug 19, 2020, 12:31 PM Sep 24, 2019, 2:56 AM

                                        This post is deleted!
                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          samtap
                                          last edited by May 27, 2020, 3:54 PM

                                          Bumping this to let devs know a fix would be very much appreciated.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                            consent.not_received