Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    12.1?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.5 Development Snapshots (Retired)
    21 Posts 7 Posters 2.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      techpro2004
      last edited by

      I am going to ask a question that is on a lot of people's minds but not many if any have asked. When will the 2.5.0 snapshots be rebased to freebsd 12.1? thanks. It is 2020 already c'mon.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        They'll be moved to 12-STABLE when they do move, and there is no ETA. We need to get 2.4.5 out first. So the usual answer: "Soon."

        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • V
          victorhooi
          last edited by

          So going by the FreeBSD releases page, FreeBSD 12.0 was released in December 2018, and FreeBSD 12.1 was released in November 2019.

          Is it mainly missing security updates, that would be a cause for concern?

          Or other things, like driver support etc?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            maverick_slo
            last edited by

            There are some fixes for Ipv6 we all hope for.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jimpJ
              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
              last edited by

              12.0 will be EOL very shortly, plus there are quite a few bugs fixed in (or after) 12.1 at the OS level that we need to pick up. We are moving to 12-STABLE at some point after 12.1, not 12.1 exactly. The details have not yet been finalized.

              Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

              Do not Chat/PM for help!

              ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JeGrJ
                JeGr LAYER 8 Moderator
                last edited by

                Also guys please keep in mind, that FreeBSD -RELEASE is not the same as -STABLE. Even if 12.1-RELEASE is dated 11/2019 that doesn't mean it's immediatly considered as -STABLE successor for 12.x

                Don't forget to upvote ๐Ÿ‘ those who kindly offered their time and brainpower to help you!

                If you're interested, I'm available to discuss details of German-speaking paid support (for companies) if needed.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User @jimp
                  last edited by

                  @jimp Last week, I moved my builds from 12.1 to 12-Stable and that went reasonably smooth. I'm current with the 2.5 changes (up to 1/14) and haven't noticed any issues. I'll continue to track the updates and let you know if something breaks.

                  NollipfSenseN ? 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • NollipfSenseN
                    NollipfSense @A Former User
                    last edited by

                    @rschell Curious how you had upgraded to FreeBSD 12.1, and why you down grade back to FreeBSD 12 stable! Based on the discussion in this thread, it seems that pfSense v2.5 might not get release this year as the wait for FreeBSD 12.1 to get stable might take September or October or possible later.

                    pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                    pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                    ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      A Former User @NollipfSense
                      last edited by

                      @NollipfSense I was having issues with 2.5 regarding 6RD implementation of ipv6 tunnels. So I decided to test build my own version. Then discovered issues with the radvd port and 12.1, so I have fixed that as well. There are a few build wiki's out there if you choose to go that route, but not for the faint at heart. :-)

                      In release vernacular, my understanding is that 12.1 a close snapshot of stable/12 at a specific time and is behind the current version of stable/12.

                      NollipfSenseN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • NollipfSenseN
                        NollipfSense @A Former User
                        last edited by

                        @rschell said in 12.1?:

                        There are a few build wiki's out there if you choose to go that route, but not for the faint at heart. :-)

                        I must say this statement got me nervous indeed, despite my naivety and willingness to learn. I am current running pfSense v2.5-dev and was wondering if I upgrade it to FreeBSD 12.1, what would happen. Do you have any links to the build wiki you mentioned?

                        pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                        pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          A Former User @NollipfSense
                          last edited by

                          @NollipfSense I've used two help guides, PiBi-NL's Building a pfSense.iso and Augustin-FL's Building pfSense iso from source. I'm currently using the later as I find it a little more straight forward.

                          Building the FreeBSD source of 12.1 or stable-12 requires applying around 170 commits from 2.5 to those sources and there are 7 or so commits that require resolution of merge conflicts. As I said, not for the faint at heart.

                          Unless there is something fundamentally not functioning in the pfSense v2.5-dev, there would not be much to gain. For me I wanted to explore ipv6 when my ISP only provides direct ipv4 but provides a 6RD tunnel for dual stack functionality.

                          I have a bare metal router as my main interface and use a Windows PC with two NICs to build a version pfSense. That PC runs three VM's to maintain the source, build and test. I found that using the Github Desktop was not viable, as Windows doesn't support the file naming conventions of some of the FreeBSD ports. So each of the VM's is running a current version of FreeBSD to avoid those conflicts.

                          NollipfSenseN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • NollipfSenseN
                            NollipfSense @A Former User
                            last edited by

                            @rschell said in 12.1?:

                            Unless there is something fundamentally not functioning in the pfSense v2.5-dev, there would not be much to gain.

                            Thank you for the links...I came to the same conclusion as well...thank you for sharing!

                            pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                            pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ?
                              A Former User @A Former User
                              last edited by

                              @rschell said in 12.1?:

                              @jimp Last week, I moved my builds from 12.1 to 12-Stable and that went reasonably smooth. I'm current with the 2.5 changes (up to 1/14) and haven't noticed any issues. I'll continue to track the updates and let you know if something breaks.

                              I'm not sure where to report these findings, so if there is a better place, move it there. Hopefully this is adding value, if not I can be silent. Since moving to the Stable/12 base, I have found to issues that will require further investigation, my tack has been to revert those commits:

                              • MFC r339557 (5d9e751) on 1/16/2020 conflicts with Loos-br's a cherry-picked commit on the 2.5 branch (8b64875 on 2/15/2019). MFC r339557 pulls in a reference to uid which was placed into an if block in if_pflog.h by Loos-br. Since change just involved improving a logging message in Stable/12, I choose to revert the MFC 339557 commit.

                              • The second commit I have had to revert is MFC r 355881 by hselasky on 12/25/2019, this commit makes a minor location change of a subroutine call in in6_mcast that causes radvd to again start to failing its IPV6_JOIN_GROUP call. I have tried debug this further without success so far.

                              Another observation, my VM installs work just fine, but my baremetal installs crash on the first boot:

                              --- trap 0xc, rip = 0xffffffff81063b46, rsp = 0xfffffe00248eda30, rbp = 0xfffffe00248eda50 ---
                              pfsync_state_export() at pfsync_state_export+0x26/frame 0xfffffe00248eda50
                              pfsync_sendout() at pfsync_sendout+0x280/frame 0xfffffe00248edb00
                              pfsyncintr() at pfsyncintr+0xd1/frame 0xfffffe00248edb50
                              ithread_loop() at ithread_loop+0x1db/frame 0xfffffe00248edbb0
                              

                              The second boot works just find, the baremetal instance has a Openvpn server running. I don't have a HA configuration setup intentionally, not sure what's triggering the crash yet. Prefer not to rebuild it from scratch if I can avoid it.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T
                                techpro2004
                                last edited by

                                It has been a few months and my original question still stands, When is pfsense 2.5 moving to 12-stable. Thanks?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jimpJ
                                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                  last edited by

                                  Soon

                                  Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • T
                                    techpro2004
                                    last edited by

                                    Not helpful using a non-answer for everything time related.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • jimpJ
                                      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                      last edited by

                                      It's the most useful reply you'll get for asking the same question repeatedly. When there is news, it will be announced. We're quite busy working on things trying to get 2.4.5 out, we also just released TNSR 20.02.

                                      Be patient. Stop asking the same question so often.

                                      Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                      Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • T
                                        techpro2004
                                        last edited by

                                        I ask the same question because I never get an answer. When I don't get an answer, I loose hope. When I loose hope, I have to check back to try to get some hope. It is a cycle and only you can break it by giving me valid answers.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • jimpJ
                                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                          last edited by

                                          You have received an answer. The most valid answer you'll get.

                                          Nobody is going to give you any kind of timeline because there is none. It will be ready when it's ready. We do not rush things like that.

                                          Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • T
                                            techpro2004
                                            last edited by

                                            So you are telling me you have no internal time goals to get projects done by. If so, how do you get your employees to do anything before it is obsolete also, you said you are pushing on 2.4.5. If you are pushing on it, then you must have an idea of when you want that released.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.