pfBlockerNG-devel v3.1.0_19/10
- 
 @cmcdonald I am seeing the same error about missing python modules on 23.01 RC, was this fixed on that version as well? 
- 
 @bigjohns97 said in pfBlockerNG-devel v3.1.0_19/10: @cmcdonald I am seeing the same error about missing python modules on 23.01 RC, was this fixed on that version as well? Yes. 
- 
 @bbcan177 said in pfBlockerNG-devel v3.1.0_19/10: he Link you posted is the HTML page. You need to use the direct link: 
 https://download.microsoft.com/download/7/1/D/71D86715-5596-4529-9B13-DA13A5DE5B63/ServiceTags_Public_20230123.jsonFair enough -- this means I will need to manually update the link each time, but better than copying the file from my computer up to pfSense each time, thanks! I might have to write a screen-scraper to pull the latest URL off the download page... 
- 
 @nimrod Can you confirm what add-on's I should see because they differ than what is posted above. pkg info "py*" unbound py311-maxminddb-2.2.0_2 
 py311-setuptools-63.1.0
 py311-sqlite3-3.11.1_8
 py39-libzfs-1.1.2022081600
 py39-setuptools-63.1.0
 py39-yaml-5.4.1
 python311-3.11.1_1
 python39-3.9.15
 unbound-1.17.0
- 
 Is this before or after pfblocker reinstall ? 
- 
 @nimrod After 
- 
 I just noticed you are on Plus version of pfsense. The output that i shared is from CE edition. 
- 
 @nimrod That wouldn't matter, the difference between 2.6/22.x and 2.7/23.x is really what I am trying to confirm was fixed. @BBcan177 builds the pfblockerng code but I believe netgate dev's such as @cmcdonald are who associate package prerequisites and manage how the actual package is presenting in package manager. This is why my original question was to @cmcdonald as to whether his fix he did in this thread was also applied to the new 2.7/23.x branch. 
- 
 
- 
 @cmcdonald said in pfBlockerNG-devel v3.1.0_19/10: Report the output of pkg info unboundunbound-1.17.0 
 Name : unbound
 Version : 1.17.0
 Installed on : Sat Jan 14 12:37:18 2023 CST
 Origin : dns/unbound
 Architecture : FreeBSD:14:amd64
 Prefix : /usr/local
 Categories : dns
 Licenses : BSD3CLAUSE
 Maintainer : jaap@NLnetLabs.nl
 WWW : https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/unbound
 Comment : Validating, recursive, and caching DNS resolver
 Options :
 DEP-RSA1024 : off
 DNSCRYPT : on
 DNSTAP : off
 DOCS : off
 DOH : on
 ECDSA : on
 EVAPI : off
 FILTER_AAAA : off
 GOST : on
 HIREDIS : off
 LIBEVENT : on
 MUNIN_PLUGIN : off
 PYTHON : on
 SUBNET : off
 TFOCL : off
 TFOSE : off
 THREADS : on
 Shared Libs required:
 libsodium.so.23
 libpython3.9.so.1.0
 libnghttp2.so.14
 libexpat.so.1
 libevent-2.1.so.7
 Shared Libs provided:
 libunbound.so.8
 Annotations :
 FreeBSD_version: 1400073
 build_timestamp: 2022-10-27T06:51:33+0000
 built_by : poudriere-git-3.3.99.20220831
 cpe : cpe:2.3:a:nlnetlabs:unbound:1.17.0:::::freebsd14:x64
 port_checkout_unclean: no
 port_git_hash : 7b7b452fb8d5
 ports_top_checkout_unclean: yes
 ports_top_git_hash: 0c964f08a5cb
 repo_type : binary
 repository : pfSense
 Flat size : 8.36MiB
 Description :
 Unbound is designed as a set of modular components, so that also
 DNSSEC (secure DNS) validation and stub-resolvers (that do not run as
 a server, but are linked into an application) are easily possible.Goals: 
 * A validating recursive DNS resolver.
 * Code diversity in the DNS resolver monoculture.
 * Drop-in replacement for BIND apart from config.
 * DNSSEC support.
 * Fully RFC compliant.
 * High performance, even with validation enabled.
 * Used as: stub resolver, full caching name server, resolver library.
 * Elegant design of validator, resolver, cache modules.
 o provide the ability to pick and choose modules.
 * Robust.
 * In C, open source: The BSD license.
 * Smallest as possible component that does the job.
 * Stub-zones can be configured (local data or AS112 zones).Non-goals: 
 * An authoritative name server.
 * Too many Features.WWW: https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/unbound ldd `which unbound`/usr/local/sbin/unbound: 
 libssl.so.111 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.111 (0x822469000)
 libsodium.so.23 => /usr/local/lib/libsodium.so.23 (0x8236ec000)
 libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x822a37000)
 libevent-2.1.so.7 => /usr/local/lib/libevent-2.1.so.7 (0x823fcb000)
 libpython3.9.so.1.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpython3.9.so.1.0 (0x824b25000)
 libcrypto.so.111 => /lib/libcrypto.so.111 (0x8259f7000)
 libnghttp2.so.14 => /usr/local/lib/libnghttp2.so.14 (0x82790a000)
 libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x825eff000)
 libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x826edd000)
 libcrypt.so.5 => /lib/libcrypt.so.5 (0x8284bd000)
 libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x829b94000)
 libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1 (0x828694000)
 libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x828758000)
 [vdso] (0x8215a5000)pkg info "py*"py311-maxminddb-2.2.0_2 
 py311-setuptools-63.1.0
 py311-sqlite3-3.11.1_8
 py39-libzfs-1.1.2022081600
 py39-setuptools-63.1.0
 py39-yaml-5.4.1
 python311-3.11.1_1
 python39-3.9.15
- 
 @bigjohns97 and this is on 23.01? 
- 
 @cmcdonald Correct, dashboard shows 23.01 RC Current Base System23.01.r.20230202.1645 
 Latest Base System23.01.r.20230202.1645
 StatusUp to date.
- 
 @bigjohns97 That is very odd. The problem is you are running older Unbound which is using Python 3.9 and not 3.11 unbound-1.17.1_2 py311-libzfs-1.1.2022081600 py311-maxminddb-2.2.0_2 py311-setuptools-63.1.0 py311-sqlite3-3.11.1_8 py39-libzfs-1.1.2022081600 py39-maxminddb-2.2.0_1 py39-setuptools-63.1.0 python311-3.11.1_1 python39-3.9.16These are the versions that we ship with 23.01-RC I would try reinstalling unbound: pkg install -fy unbound
- 
 @cmcdonald That's odd, I also seem to be missing that 311 libzfs which I am using zfs and boot environments. How would I go about getting these correct packages? Edit: that worked, I now show the following. py311-maxminddb-2.2.0_2 
 py311-setuptools-63.1.0
 py311-sqlite3-3.11.1_8
 py39-libzfs-1.1.2022081600
 py39-setuptools-63.1.0
 py39-yaml-5.4.1
 python311-3.11.1_1
 python39-3.9.15
 unbound-1.17.1_2
- 
 @bigjohns97 what if you just do pkg upgradewhat does it offer to upgrade?
- 
 Updating pfSense-core repository catalogue... 
 pfSense-core repository is up to date.
 Updating pfSense repository catalogue...
 pfSense repository is up to date.
 All repositories are up to date.
 Checking for upgrades (4 candidates): 100%
 Processing candidates (4 candidates): 100%
 The following 5 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):New packages to be INSTALLED: 
 whois: 5.5.7 [pfSense]Installed packages to be UPGRADED: 
 pfSense: 23.01.b.20230106.0600 -> 23.01.r.20230202.1645 [pfSense]
 pfSense-Status_Monitoring: 1.7.11_4 -> 1.8 [pfSense]
 pfSense-repo: 23.01.b.20230106.0600 -> 23.01.r.20230202.1645 [pfSense]
 python39: 3.9.15 -> 3.9.16 [pfSense]Number of packages to be installed: 1 
 Number of packages to be upgraded: 471 KiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: 
- 
 What repo is set on the update GUI page? 
- 
 
- 
 Very strange.... I'm not sure how you've got in the state that you have, but I would first the pkg upgradeabove, let that install, and then go back and trypkg upgradeagain and see what it offers. It almost seems like you're still pointing at an old repository (you're version of pfSense-repo is 23.01.b)strange. Get the pfSense-repo package updated, and let's try again. 
- 
 @cmcdonald Sry to interrupt, I have no hit with pkg info py* 
 Is this normal?[23.01-RC][admin@pfSense.home.arpa]/root: pkg info py* pkg: No match.


