• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

[solved] Question regarding MIM: Controller not having a static *public* IP possible?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plus 24.11 Development Snapshots (Retired)
36 Posts 3 Posters 1.7k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B
    Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @marcosm
    last edited by Bob.Dig Nov 7, 2024, 2:07 PM Nov 7, 2024, 2:07 PM

    @marcosm You mean DDNS? Or tunnel in another tunnel? Because I have the feeling it should already work but it doesn't for me.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • M
      marcosm Netgate
      last edited by marcosm Nov 7, 2024, 2:48 PM Nov 7, 2024, 2:31 PM

      Yeah, I meant that an FQDN could be used for a controller behind dynamic addresses.

      I'm not sure about running MIM over an existing tunnel. It doesn't make much sense to do for a number of reasons which I don't want to go into detail now, but also in part because MIM already creates a secure tunnel between the client and controller. It's possible it skips other VPN interfaces, I'll have to check.

      B 1 Reply Last reply Nov 7, 2024, 3:21 PM Reply Quote 1
      • B
        Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @marcosm
        last edited by Bob.Dig Nov 7, 2024, 8:52 PM Nov 7, 2024, 3:21 PM

        @marcosm It looks like it is not trying to use any WireGuard tunnel. What is puzzling though, the Registration Data does contain my dynamic public IPv4-Address, still the status doesn't change.

        S 1 Reply Last reply Nov 7, 2024, 10:39 PM Reply Quote 0
        • S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @Bob.Dig
          last edited by Nov 7, 2024, 10:39 PM

          @Bob-Dig said in Question regarding MIM: Controller not having a static *public* IP possible?:

          What is puzzling though, the Registration Data does contain my dynamic public IPv4-Address, still the status doesn't change.

          It doesn't try to connect to the external IPv4 the controller has?

          B 1 Reply Last reply Nov 8, 2024, 7:56 AM Reply Quote 0
          • B
            Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @stephenw10
            last edited by Bob.Dig Nov 8, 2024, 8:37 AM Nov 8, 2024, 7:56 AM

            @stephenw10 said in Question regarding MIM: Controller not having a static *public* IP possible?:

            It doesn't try to connect to the external IPv4 the controller has?

            It does, still the status never changes for me.

            Screenshot 2024-11-08 085343.png

            Edit: Both sides are behind NAT but that shouldn't make any difference I guess.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by Nov 8, 2024, 1:50 PM

              Ok I guess I'm unclear exactly what's happening here. You have a number of IPs shown and they don't seem to match.

              You should be able to connect from some external resource to a controller behind a dynamic IP as long as it hasn't changed since it was configured. And as long as the traffic is forwarded to the controller if it's behind NAT.

              B 1 Reply Last reply Nov 8, 2024, 2:42 PM Reply Quote 0
              • B
                Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                last edited by Bob.Dig Nov 8, 2024, 2:50 PM Nov 8, 2024, 2:42 PM

                @stephenw10 said in Question regarding MIM: Controller not having a static *public* IP possible?:

                You should be able to connect from some external resource to a controller behind a dynamic IP as long as it hasn't changed since it was configured. And as long as the traffic is forwarded to the controller if it's behind NAT.

                Sure. And that is the case here. And if I disable and enable MIM it should reset, right? But as you can see in the last picture, it is "connecting" anyways because my public IP actually hasn't changed. It is changing roughly once a week.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by Nov 8, 2024, 4:15 PM

                  Ah, OK. Well fqdn support is incoming....

                  B 1 Reply Last reply Nov 8, 2024, 4:45 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                    last edited by Nov 8, 2024, 4:45 PM

                    @stephenw10 Good to know but still, it isn't working here like it should. But I am just reporting, don't need this feature. 😉

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by Nov 8, 2024, 5:09 PM

                      Hmm, so just to be clear, what is not working as expected? Disabling and re-enabling MIM does not clear the registration data.

                      B 1 Reply Last reply Nov 8, 2024, 5:13 PM Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                        last edited by Nov 8, 2024, 5:13 PM

                        @stephenw10 Status is still unknown. But the second part is interesting. So when my public IP is finally changing, then I can not test this anymore because the registration data is not changing?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by Nov 8, 2024, 5:56 PM

                          With status unknown like that the client has never connected back to the controller. So the traffic is probably blocked somewhere because it looks like it's trying to connect.

                          Currently the client connects back to the 'server' using only the IP address(es) passed to it in the registration data. So if the server side changes IP the connection will fail. Thus only static IPs are really supported for that side. But FQDN support is coming.

                          B 2 Replies Last reply Nov 8, 2024, 6:00 PM Reply Quote 0
                          • B
                            Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                            last edited by Nov 8, 2024, 6:00 PM

                            @stephenw10 But it is not blocked, you can see that in the last picture I posted. It can talk to the MIM Port on my (private) WAN-IP at home, just saying.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B
                              Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                              last edited by Bob.Dig Nov 8, 2024, 7:38 PM Nov 8, 2024, 7:02 PM

                              @stephenw10 Maybe it all is related to this?
                              Screenshot 2024-11-08 200050.png
                              Is this a timeout message? That VPS is horrible slow. Or there is an activation problem?

                              Log on Client

                              Nov 8 20:30:52 pfnet-controller 71929 797876 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] GET /api/device/controller (DONE 129.606ms) OK: success
                              Nov 8 20:30:52 pfnet-controller 71929 797876 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] GET /api/device/controller
                              Nov 8 20:30:48 pfnet-controller 71929 INFO Applying changes into config.xml
                              Nov 8 20:30:48 pfnet-controller 71929 711767 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/captiveportalbackup (DONE 5.991ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:48 pfnet-controller 71929 698279 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/logsbackup (DONE 0.958ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:48 pfnet-controller 71929 666789 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/dhcpbackup (DONE 1.080ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:48 pfnet-controller 71929 657424 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/rrdbackup (DONE 1.353ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:48 pfnet-controller 71929 401318 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/use_mfs_tmpvar (DONE 0.999ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:48 pfnet-controller 71929 344427 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/dpinger_dont_add_static_routes (DONE 1.147ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:48 pfnet-controller 71929 129633 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/keep_failover_states (DONE 1.041ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:48 pfnet-controller 71929 112933 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/remove_failover_states_default (DONE 1.065ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:48 pfnet-controller 71929 96084 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/schedule_states (DONE 1.204ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:48 pfnet-controller 71929 36961 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/pti_disabled (DONE 1.457ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 936446 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/thermal_hardware (DONE 1.333ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 926102 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/ipsec_mb (DONE 1.064ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 914451 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/crypto_hardware (DONE 1.378ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 566861 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/watchdogd_enable (DONE 1.040ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 460392 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/powerd_enable (DONE 1.268ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 451874 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/block_external_services (DONE 1.173ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 437248 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/do_not_send_uniqueid (DONE 1.890ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 416491 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/lb_use_sticky (DONE 1.015ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 407598 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/proxypass (DONE 1.380ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 402921 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/proxyuser (DONE 1.004ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 397833 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/proxyport (DONE 0.944ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 391868 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/proxyurl (DONE 1.263ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found
                              Nov 8 20:30:47 pfnet-controller 71929 328168 [/var/run/pfnet-controller.sock] DELETE /api/config/system/harddiskstandby (DONE 23.195ms) ERROR: (*urlhandler.HandlerError) 400 not found

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by Nov 8, 2024, 9:00 PM

                                Hmm, so the client is connecting out to the controller at the correct public IP but it never arrives at the controller?

                                B 1 Reply Last reply Nov 8, 2024, 9:25 PM Reply Quote 0
                                • B
                                  Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                                  last edited by Nov 8, 2024, 9:25 PM

                                  @stephenw10 It is working now! Most probably the VM needed more RAM than I thought. It had only 512 MB before. I will mark this solved.

                                  B 1 Reply Last reply Nov 9, 2024, 12:08 PM Reply Quote 1
                                  • B
                                    Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @Bob.Dig
                                    last edited by Nov 9, 2024, 12:08 PM

                                    Today it is not working anymore but also there was the first IP change on my side. Doing some port magic didn't helped. So if I am able to, I will host the controller on a second instance in the cloud (with a static IP).

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • B
                                      Bob.Dig LAYER 8
                                      last edited by Bob.Dig Nov 12, 2024, 12:39 PM Nov 12, 2024, 10:34 AM

                                      Maybe some last thought about this in this thread. I now had the chance to use a third Plus-Installation, it is on a VPS (2) too.
                                      It worked right away to register it to the controller at home, while the other VPS (1) still didn't worked.

                                      I then removed all peers and toggled the controller on all instances and registered all peers to the controller on VPS 2. This worked out of the box. There is not much difference on those two VPS other than that VPS 1 is very slow and that VPN connections towards the pfSense at home differs.

                                      One problem I noticed with that new setup (on VPS 2) is that VPS 1 is still trying to connect at every second towards Home over one WireGuard tunnel. And I can't stop it other than blocking it. I will open another thread about this.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • B
                                        Bob.Dig LAYER 8
                                        last edited by Bob.Dig Nov 14, 2024, 11:20 AM Nov 14, 2024, 11:18 AM

                                        OT but didn't deserve its own thread I think: On 24.11-RC I noticed that on an installation (with 1 Gig RAM) the pfnet-controller Service wasn't running. I did a reboot, saw the same thing again. Starting it manually works. That controller is the actual controller of two other instances.
                                        Only thing I noticed:

                                        Screenshot 2024-11-14 115537.png

                                        No problem with my main-machine though. The service is running but it is not the controller of other instances.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M
                                          marcosm Netgate
                                          last edited by Nov 14, 2024, 1:33 PM

                                          Are the logs any different if you increase the log level?

                                          B 1 Reply Last reply Nov 14, 2024, 4:47 PM Reply Quote 0
                                          13 out of 36
                                          • First post
                                            13/36
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                            consent.not_received