Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New pfblockerNG install Database Sanity check Failed

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    22 Posts 7 Posters 300 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      madmaxpr
      last edited by

      I just did a clean install of pfBlockerNG and on update or reload I see this in the log:

      Database Sanity check [  FAILED  ] ** These two counts should match! **
      ------------
      Masterfile Count    [ 16932 ]
      Deny folder Count   [ 16931 ]
      
      Duplication sanity check (Pass=No IPs reported)
      

      No idea on this, its working but I have no idea what it means and google is no help so stuck with that message, but otherwise is working fine.

      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        SteveITS Galactic Empire @madmaxpr
        last edited by

        @madmaxpr what version of pfSense and pfBlocker?

        Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
        When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
        Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          madmaxpr @SteveITS
          last edited by

          @SteveITS

          2.8.0-RC (amd64)
          built on Fri May 16 16:21:00 BST 2025
          FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT
          
          The system is on the latest version.
          Version information updated at Sat May 24 17:17:34 BST 2025
          
          pfBlockerNG		net 	3.2.8
          
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            madmaxpr
            last edited by

            Still seeing this on the newest 2.8 release, just updated today.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • tinfoilmattT
              tinfoilmatt
              last edited by

              Try performing the process outlined under Firewall / pfBlockerNG / General / Keep Settings:

              Note: To clear all downloaded lists, uncheck these two checkboxes and 'Save'. Re-check both boxes and run a 'Force Update|Reload'

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                marchand.guy @tinfoilmatt
                last edited by

                @tinfoilmatt I don't see "2 settings" just one.

                M tinfoilmattT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  marchand.guy @marchand.guy
                  last edited by

                  @marchand-guy And no, it did not fix the error.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • tinfoilmattT
                    tinfoilmatt @marchand.guy
                    last edited by

                    @marchand-guy said in New pfblockerNG install Database Sanity check Failed:

                    @tinfoilmatt I don't see "2 settings" just one.

                    Firewall / pfBlockerNG / General / pfBlockerNG "Enable" checkbox

                    and

                    Firewall / pfBlockerNG / General / Keep Settings "Enable" checkbox

                    Uncheck both checkboxes (to disable each), click "Save", re-check both checkboxes (to re-enable each), click "Save" again—and finally run Force Update | Reload All.

                    You might consider starting a new thead unless you have the same exact issue as OP (i.e., a failed "Database Sanity check").

                    M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      marchand.guy @tinfoilmatt
                      last edited by

                      @tinfoilmatt Same exact problem. Thank you.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        marchand.guy @tinfoilmatt
                        last edited by

                        @tinfoilmatt Same result as OP after your suggestion:
                        Database Sanity check [ FAILED ] ** These two counts should match! **

                        Masterfile Count [ 81362 ]
                        Deny folder Count [ 81361 ]

                        tinfoilmattT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • tinfoilmattT
                          tinfoilmatt @marchand.guy
                          last edited by

                          @marchand-guy What do you see in the error.log file? Anything else relevant printed to the pfblockerng.log file?

                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            marchand.guy @tinfoilmatt
                            last edited by

                            @tinfoilmatt Nothing relevant in pfblockerng.log, aside from the reported error.
                            What I found is that the masterfile has indeed 81362 entries, but the deny files amount to 81364. Comparing the 2, I see that the deny files have 127.1.7.7 listed 3 times instead of 1 in the masterfile. So somehow the code is mishandling the duplicates between the 2 files.

                            BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • BBcan177B
                              BBcan177 Moderator @marchand.guy
                              last edited by

                              @marchand-guy

                              The code should handle the blank file ip placeholder.

                              Starts at Line 1232 to 1289
                              https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/blob/0acb5dc2ad321340aafdf282a20f9c02762d49d5/net/pfSense-pkg-pfBlockerNG-devel/files/usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.sh#L1232

                              Maybe there is some corner case the code is missing?

                              "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                              Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                              Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                              Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • M
                                marchand.guy @BBcan177
                                last edited by

                                @BBcan177 I am not a programmer. But a simple "sort -u" of the deny files entries bring them back to 81362. Just saying...

                                tinfoilmattT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • tinfoilmattT
                                  tinfoilmatt @marchand.guy
                                  last edited by

                                  @marchand-guy Did you compare your pfblocker.sh to the appropriate branch version?

                                  What version of pfSense? What version of pfBlockerNG/-devel?

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    marchand.guy @tinfoilmatt
                                    last edited by

                                    @tinfoilmatt
                                    2.8.0-RELEASE (amd64)
                                    built on Wed May 21 19:12:00 EDT 2025
                                    FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT

                                    The system is on the latest version.
                                    Version information updated at Sat May 31 15:09:52 EDT

                                    pfBlockerNG net 3.2.8
                                    (yes I tried the -devel version prior to this one. no difference)

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M
                                      Maltz
                                      last edited by Maltz

                                      I'm seeing the same off-by-one error on my system. I'm running the same versions as marchand.guy.

                                      What is the impact of this error? Does it prevent any functionality?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        madmaxpr
                                        last edited by

                                        @SteveITS Still seeing this error myself but have no further info. It does seem to function, just with the error being shown when it updates/reloads.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • T
                                          TheXman
                                          last edited by TheXman

                                          I was experiencing the same issue too.

                                          After comparing /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.sh from 3.2.0_0 to 3.2.8, there was only 1 line that changed and it happened to be related to this issue. After reverting that line (#1281) back to the way it was in 3.2.0_8, the "Sanity Check" works as expected.

                                          Here are the lines as they exist in their respective versions.

                                          #Line 1281 in 3.2.0_8
                                          if [ "${s1} == ${s2}" ]; then
                                          
                                          #Line 1281 in 3.2.8
                                          if [ "${s1}" == "${s2}" ]; then
                                          

                                          Edit: Corrected my references to pfBlockerNG version numbers. Thanks @Maltz

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • M
                                            Maltz @TheXman
                                            last edited by Maltz

                                            @TheXman Wouldn't the 2.7.2 version always evaluate as true, since the string is non-null? It looks like the sanity check was fixed in 2.8.0, exposing some other issue that may have been there all along but was hidden by the broken sanity check.

                                            (Edit: I guess the version numbers should be 3.2.0_8 and 3.2.8, respectively, since we're talking about pfBlockerNG and not pfSense itself.)

                                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.