Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Portknocking-Daemon-GUI or Package –> {CANCELED}

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Expired/Withdrawn Bounties
    42 Posts 9 Posters 26.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H
      heiko
      last edited by

      Hello,

      the bounty is now set to 500 €. We can arrange anything of this bounty up to the due state " 01.05.2007". Thereafter i will kill this bounty.

      Greetings
      heiko

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        Justinw
        last edited by

        Outside the US most people do day/month/year if that makes more sense to people reading this post, not that it is my place, but I thought it needed to be clarified.  So if I'm reading it right, it won't be over for a month and a half

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          heiko
          last edited by

          Excuse me, the german date translation is for other people abnormal, i think..

          The offer will be dropped at Year = 2007 ; Month = Mai, Day = 01

          I hope, this is undestandable.
          Greetings
          heiko

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            sullrich
            last edited by

            I will be taking this one on as soon as you declare time based rules a success.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • H
              heiko
              last edited by

              OK, i am await for finished time based ruled system.Then we could arrange "portknocking"
              greetings
              heiko

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H
                heiko
                last edited by

                Hello Scott,
                one Extension: I want to blocking countries and i know from another thread, that this is implemented in HEAD. Can you backported this to a productive PFSENSE-RELENG-SNAPSHOT Version?

                Portknocking = 500 €
                Blocking-Countries= 250 €

                Do you disposed to this extension. It would be very nice?

                I know, i am a nag…. :)
                Greetings from Germany
                heiko

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  sullrich
                  last edited by

                  No, I am affraid not.  We are about to enter beta status as soon as the final Time Based Rules bugs are fixed.

                  Sorry!  Maybe on next version.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • H
                    heiko
                    last edited by

                    OK, thanks, then we can arrange the port knocking when the timebased rules are finished

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JeGrJ
                      JeGr LAYER 8 Moderator
                      last edited by

                      Don't want to disturb the thread but I'm curious for what you (or people generally) want to use portknocking for and (if that's generally possible doing with pfsense/freebsd/pf) if authpf wouldn't be a better/other approach to the desired result. Coming from the OpenBSD side I used authpf for quite a few thingies, people want portknocking for, so I thought I should maybe throw this in here.

                      Greets Grey

                      Don't forget to upvote 👍 those who kindly offered their time and brainpower to help you!

                      If you're interested, I'm available to discuss details of German-speaking paid support (for companies) if needed.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        sullrich
                        last edited by

                        Yes it is possible: http://doorman.sourceforge.net/

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          sullrich
                          last edited by

                          Looks like doorman will not be a suitable package as it requires a client to do the knocking….  Need to find a package that works with PF and does not require a client.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • H
                            heiko
                            last edited by

                            i agree with that. The project is on sourceforge not really active, i think?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              cmb
                              last edited by

                              Every port knocking daemon is going to require a client. It could be something as simple as a batch file/shell script that telnets to several ports, but they all need a client of some sort. It's no different from OpenVPN, in that it requires a client that we don't provide.

                              I say start with doorman, if it doesn't work for some technical or compatibility reason, move on to something else.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B
                                BuddhaChu
                                last edited by

                                Doorman requires a specific client in that it transmits the knock in one UDP packet on one port and doesn't knock on several ports in certain order (the way most "normal" portknocking setups work).

                                My point being that Joe Blow just can't grab any old portknocking client…it would need to do the following:

                                This particular implementation deviates a bit from his original proposal, in that the doorman watches for only a single UDP packet.  To get the doorman to open up, the packet must contain an MD5 hash which correctly hashes a shared secret, salted with a 32-bit random number, the identifying user or group-name, and the requested service port-number.

                                I guess if you enable this package in your pfSense box, you better be prepared to use a specific client.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • H
                                  heiko
                                  last edited by

                                  Hmm, would it be better if i cancel this bounty and we say "no solution is safe and required a specific client"??
                                  If Portknocking under BSD/pf is not possible or the solution is not safety so i´m doubtful to create a solution for pfsense?!

                                  A portknocking package is nice but not by hook or by crook!!

                                  What do you think Scott? I don´t know? :'(
                                  Greetings
                                  heiko

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • B
                                    BuddhaChu
                                    last edited by

                                    Don't cancel it on account of what I said.  :(

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • S
                                      sullrich
                                      last edited by

                                      I think you should not listen to the back seat drivers.  Let me keep digging around for a solution.  I have been trying to get knockd ported from Linux and am about 60% done.

                                      If you have a 3-4 knock key, ie:

                                      telnet ip 945
                                      telnet ip 5678
                                      telnet ip 1234
                                      telnet ip 4756

                                      Then I don't see how much this will hurt.  Besides, what exactly are you planning on exposing once you knock?  The webConfigurator or possibly SSH?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • H
                                        heiko
                                        last edited by

                                        I set the Bounty for the portknocking feature to

                                        1000 €

                                        Greetings
                                        Heiko

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • D
                                          DanielSHaischt
                                          last edited by

                                          Just to document what I've found about port knocking so far:

                                          research paper:
                                          http://www.runtux.com/files/download/portknock.4.pdf

                                          fwknop - promissing but Linux based:
                                          http://www.cipherdyne.org/fwknop/

                                          trapdoor2 - may work out of the box on BSD:
                                          http://oss.linbit.com/trapdoor2/

                                          webknocking - an alternative approach in some kind of an early stage:
                                          http://www.webknocking.de/semaphor.php?item=webknocking_en

                                          Reverse Remote Shell - Very interesting but needs a client:
                                          http://www.cycom.se/dl/rrs

                                          and of course:
                                          http://www.portknocking.org/view/implementations

                                          Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With kind regards
                                          DAn.I.El S. Haischt

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • S
                                            sullrich
                                            last edited by

                                            I will continue porting knockd over to FreeBSD.  It seems to be the nicest of the bunch.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.