Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Should I be using Unbound Python mode? Is it stable?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    55 Posts 10 Posters 15.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • keyserK
      keyser Rebel Alliance @keyser
      last edited by

      @keyser PNG image.png

      A good chunk of the daily lost space happens when the pfBlockerNG CRON job runs.

      Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        mcury Rebel Alliance @keyser
        last edited by mcury

        Mine seems to be fine.. SG-3100 21.05.1 UFS with DNS Reply Logging disabled in DNSBL.. Python mode btw..

        [21.05.1-RELEASE][xxx]/root: iostat -x
                                extended device statistics
        device       r/s     w/s     kr/s     kw/s  ms/r  ms/w  ms/o  ms/t qlen  %b
        flash/sp       0       0      0.0      0.0     7     0     0     7    0   0
        mmcsd0         0       2      0.4     50.1     2     3     0     3    0   0
        mmcsd0bo       0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0
        mmcsd0bo       0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0
        md0            0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0
        [21.05.1-RELEASE][xxx]/root: uptime
         5:32PM  up 5 days,  4:41, 2 users, load averages: 0.24, 0.42, 0.41
        

        dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

        V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • V
          vjizzle @mcury
          last edited by vjizzle

          I did some tests on a system with 60+ days uptime and setup unbound with python mode. This is what I see when running the iostat command:

          extended device statistics
          device       r/s     w/s     kr/s     kw/s  ms/r  ms/w  ms/o  ms/t qlen  %b
          md0            0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0
          ada0           0      22      0.0    330.1     0     0     1     4    0   1
          pass0          0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0
          

          Do I need to worry?

          keyserK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • keyserK
            keyser Rebel Alliance @vjizzle
            last edited by

            @vjizzle Depends om how large your Sata SSD is.

            It’s doing 330Kb writes pr. Second on average. That’s:

            0,33Mb * 60sec * 60min * 24hours * 365 days = 10.4TB/year

            If your SSD is 128Gb or bigger, it’s probably not an issue. But if it’s 32Gb Id think about it. 16Gb or smaller and I’d be very worried.

            Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

            V M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • V
              vjizzle @keyser
              last edited by

              @keyser It is 120GB m2 ssd so I am safe I hope. I saw on Reddit that bbcan177 released a patch for the growing files on disk. I hope he can tackle the frequent writes as well.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                mcury Rebel Alliance @keyser
                last edited by

                @keyser said in Should I be using Unbound Python mode? Is it stable?:

                0,33Mb * 60sec * 60min * 24hours * 365 days = 10.4TB/year

                So, based on that formula, I would be using around:

                0,05Mb * 60sec * 60min * 24hours * 365 days = 1.58TB/year

                With these writes, do you think I should be worried with a 8 GB eMMC Flash ?

                dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

                keyserK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • keyserK
                  keyser Rebel Alliance @mcury
                  last edited by

                  @mcury said in Should I be using Unbound Python mode? Is it stable?:

                  So, based on that formula, I would be using around:

                  0,05Mb * 60sec * 60min * 24hours * 365 days = 1.58TB/year

                  With these writes, do you think I should be worried with a 8 GB eMMC Flash ?

                  I wouldn’t. The 8Gb eMMC is rated at about 11Tb write endurance as far as I have been able to find out.

                  So you should be good for about 8-9 years - likely longer than your appliance will be in service anyways.

                  Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • M
                    mcury Rebel Alliance @keyser
                    last edited by mcury

                    after the last update from pfblockerng, stats are worse than before, at least for me..

                    top -m io
                    unbound showing 100%

                    iostat -x
                                            extended device statistics  
                    device       r/s     w/s     kr/s     kw/s  ms/r  ms/w  ms/o  ms/t qlen  %b  
                    flash/sp       0       0      0.0      0.0     7     0     0     7    0   0 
                    mmcsd0         0      13     11.8    193.6     1     1     0     1    0   1 
                    mmcsd0bo       0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0 
                    mmcsd0bo       0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0 
                    md0            0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0 
                    
                    uptime 
                    11:49AM  up  2:21, 2 users, load averages: 0.30, 0.34, 0.31
                    

                    Edit: As soon as I changed from python mode to unbound mode, unbound disappeared from top -m io

                    dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

                    keyserK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • keyserK
                      keyser Rebel Alliance @mcury
                      last edited by keyser

                      @mcury said in Should I be using Unbound Python mode? Is it stable?:

                      after the last update from pfblockerng, stats are worse than before, at least for me..

                      top -m io
                      unbound showing 100%

                      iostat -x
                                              extended device statistics  
                      device       r/s     w/s     kr/s     kw/s  ms/r  ms/w  ms/o  ms/t qlen  %b  
                      flash/sp       0       0      0.0      0.0     7     0     0     7    0   0 
                      mmcsd0         0      13     11.8    193.6     1     1     0     1    0   1 
                      mmcsd0bo       0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0 
                      mmcsd0bo       0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0 
                      md0            0       0      0.0      0.0     0     0     0     0    0   0 
                      
                      uptime 
                      11:49AM  up  2:21, 2 users, load averages: 0.30, 0.34, 0.31
                      

                      Edit: As soon as I changed from python mode to unbound mode, unbound disappeared from top -m io

                      You can’t use that command since you rebooted only 2:21 hours ago. Is shows average since last boot, and your boot skews those Numbers massively. You need to run realtime i intervals to see Whats going on: “iostat -d 5 6”
                      Six intervals of 5 seconds

                      Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        mcury Rebel Alliance @keyser
                        last edited by mcury

                        @keyser said in Should I be using Unbound Python mode? Is it stable?:

                        iostat -d 5 6

                        unbound mode:
                        iostat -d 5 6
                                  flash/           mmcsd0           mmcsd0           mmcsd0 
                          KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s 
                          3.23   0  0.00  14.84  14  0.20   3.23   0  0.00   3.23   0  0.00 
                          0.00   0  0.00  20.50   2  0.04   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00 
                          0.00   0  0.00  13.79   1  0.02   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00 
                          0.00   0  0.00  25.88   3  0.07   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00 
                          0.00   0  0.00   0.50   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00 
                          0.00   0  0.00   4.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00
                        

                        changed to python mode again, ran a reload:

                        python mode:

                        iostat -d 5 6
                                  flash/           mmcsd0           mmcsd0           mmcsd0 
                          KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s 
                          3.23   0  0.00  14.97  13  0.20   3.23   0  0.00   3.23   0  0.00 
                          0.00   0  0.00  13.97   4  0.05   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00 
                          0.00   0  0.00   2.83   1  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00 
                          0.00   0  0.00  26.67   4  0.11   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00 
                          0.00   0  0.00  32.00   0  0.01   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00 
                          0.00   0  0.00  29.67   5  0.16   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00
                        

                        Edit: Something changed.. top -m io is not showing unbound anymore..
                        So it seems that just changing from python to unbound and then reverting back to python mode fixed it.. at least now it's not showing unbound in top -m io anymore..

                        dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

                        keyserK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • keyserK
                          keyser Rebel Alliance @mcury
                          last edited by

                          @mcury Those numbers also look fine. There’s no massive writing anymore. So you are in the clear :-)

                          Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • E Eria211 referenced this topic on
                          • S SteveITS referenced this topic on
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.