Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Rules not respected?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    13 Posts 5 Posters 1.3k Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S Offline
      SteveITS Rebel Alliance @peterlecki
      last edited by

      @peterlecki if you log blocks, it is pfSense blocking it? Not a firewall on the server?

      Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
      When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to reboot, or more depending on packages, and device or disk speed.
      Upvote ๐Ÿ‘ helpful posts!

      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P Offline
        peterlecki @SteveITS
        last edited by

        @steveits
        The problem is that it's NOT blocking while it should.

        M S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          mer @peterlecki
          last edited by mer

          @peterlecki
          Interface rules are "into" the interface.
          Your LAN rule should have source from OPT1Net, OPT1 rule should have source from LANNet.

          The way you have them written it would block the returns, but since there is outbound state for the return, the return is not blocked. That's why it doesn't appear to work.

          ping lanhost from opt1host creates outbound state on OPT1 interface.
          icmp reply from lanhost gets evaluated against OPT1 rules, there is state because of the outbound from opt1host.

          H P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H Offline
            heper @mer
            last edited by

            @mer said in Rules not respected?:

            @peterlecki
            Interface rules are "into" the interface.
            Your LAN rule should have source from OPT1Net, OPT1 rule should have source from LANNet.

            The way you have them written it would block the returns, but since there is outbound state for the return, the return is not blocked. That's why it doesn't appear to work.

            ping lanhost from opt1host creates outbound state on OPT1 interface.
            icmp reply from lanhost gets evaluated against OPT1 rules, there is state because of the outbound from opt1host.

            normal rules for interface 'lan' can never have source 'opt1' ... this is wrong

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              mer @heper
              last edited by

              @heper Of course. Unless a packet were spoofed.
              But the other point about interface rules being applied on the in direction still holds.

              So the rules as shown are not going to prevent a packet from opt1host from getting sent because that's an "out" on OPT1.

              If the rules were made into Floating rules, and the direction was defined as "out" then OP should get the desired result.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Offline
                peterlecki @mer
                last edited by

                @mer
                Even though I'm not at all understanding how the LAN interface should have a OPT1net as incoming source, I made it both ways, but as I expected, it made no difference.

                On the LAN interface there is a default rule to "allow LAN to any" - I didn't create this, it was automatically made during initial setup. As you can see the source is LANnet which is how I made the rule to block traffic to OPT1net. Hence my confusion about your comment to use OPT1net as the source.

                rule4.png
                rule5.png
                rule6.png

                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  mer @peterlecki
                  last edited by

                  @peterlecki I was wrong about that.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • S Offline
                    SteveITS Rebel Alliance @peterlecki
                    last edited by

                    @peterlecki said in Rules not respected?:

                    The problem is that it's NOT blocking while it should.

                    Yeah sorry, I answered late at night and apparently was misremembering. The device firewall comes up here every month or two.

                    A restart would definitely clear states of course. Have you looked at Diagnostics/States after you ping to see what is open?

                    Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                    When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to reboot, or more depending on packages, and device or disk speed.
                    Upvote ๐Ÿ‘ helpful posts!

                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ Offline
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @SteveITS
                      last edited by johnpoz

                      do you have any floating rules? Your rules are correct for blocking

                      you sure your actually isolated.. I do see evaluation on your rules - that that sure looks like traffic is flowing through pfsense.

                      Floating rule would be my guess..

                      But since you got hits when you put up the wrong source for the interface.. That screams your not actually isolated at Layer 2.

                      How is lan and opt actually connected to pfsense - if those flow into the same dumb switch you are not actually isolated at layer 2.

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 25.07 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P Offline
                        peterlecki
                        last edited by

                        This was a user error. All is well.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.