Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    FreeBSD 12.3

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved CE 2.6.0 Development Snapshots (Retired)
    29 Posts 8 Posters 4.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      netblues @NollipfSense
      last edited by

      Once the new version reaches beta status, it is quite safe to try it in non production, (or not very critical) systems.

      If your system runs under vm in any case, then its even easier to go this way.
      The benefit is that if you find a bug, chances are you will get a fix included in the release.
      And yes, you have to use it to find the bug too.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • bmeeksB
        bmeeks
        last edited by

        There can be a bit of a catch-22 here as well. If the vast majority of users swear off using beta or development software, then testing of new versions suffers and bugs (even critical ones) can go unnoticed all the way into release.

        I fully understand not wanting to run development or beta software in a critical production system, but in many networks there are opportunities for accepting a bit of risk in the name of testing. For example, maybe for a small business there is a branch office or two where instead of RELEASE pfSense you could run DEVEL. As others have mentioned, running pfSense virtualized is a great way to help in the testing program because you can so easily rollback to a previous snapshot if you encounter a critical error.

        One thing Netgate really can't do well in a software development testing lab is reproduce all the different hardware and network setups that exist with users. So having robust participation from a wide array of users in the DEVEL snapshot testing branch is vital to a successful RELEASE update.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
        • N
          NRgia @eoghan
          last edited by

          @eoghan said in FreeBSD 12.3:

          Hi guys

          I know it's not advisable to run the snapshots in a production environment. However I'm interested to see if anyone is and does the bases being updated to freebsd 12.3 introduce any show stopping bugs. I only ask as I like running all my home systems on the bleeding edge of software again I know it's not advisable but is a fantastic way to learn in the event of a crash for debugging code that might not have crashed in a VM/Lab environment.

          Thanks
          Eoghan

          No issues from my side. I have been running it from this summer. But my use case is not your use case. Please make sure you're not installing on your production machine. Please test your use case first.

          NollipfSenseN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • NollipfSenseN
            NollipfSense @NRgia
            last edited by NollipfSense

            @nrgia But, that's exactly what he wants to do (production mode for home network) and with the proper safeguards mentioned as well as in place, we should encourage him. I find 2.6 to be very stable despite the few bugs to work out.

            pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
            pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

            E N 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • E
              eoghan @NollipfSense
              last edited by

              @nollipfsense

              I went one step further with my backup/recovery solution.

              Every couple of days I'm doing a complete clone of the ssd the I have pfsense installed on but also keeping a pfsense install usb handy just as another recovery method in case the ssd image fails to apply or something.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                NRgia @NollipfSense
                last edited by

                @nollipfsense said in FreeBSD 12.3:

                @nrgia But, that's exactly what he wants to do (production mode for home network) and with the proper safeguards mentioned as well as in place, we should encourage him. I find 2.6 to be very stable despite the few bugs to work out.

                I think you misunderstood me. I'm not trying to scare anybody away. But first, just to play it safe, it's good to test your use case on different machine, beeing bare metal or VM. And if it works, then you can upgrade the production one too. At least this is my approach. The backups are also a good thing, but sometimes even a little bit of downtime can cause troubles, why not avoid it?

                NollipfSenseN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • NollipfSenseN
                  NollipfSense @NRgia
                  last edited by

                  @nrgia Okay...

                  pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                  pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                  N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N
                    NRgia @NollipfSense
                    last edited by NRgia

                    @nollipfsense

                    If you didn't notice already starting from today 13/01/2022 my 2.6.0-DEVELOPMENT updated to 2.7.0-DEVELOPMENT.

                    pfSense_2.7.0.png

                    How about that?

                    Nevermind I saw the discussion here:

                    https://forum.netgate.com/topic/169043/what-are-the-road-signs-we-re-getting-close-to-a-released-version-of-2-6/11

                    NollipfSenseN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • NollipfSenseN
                      NollipfSense @NRgia
                      last edited by

                      @nrgia said in FreeBSD 12.3:

                      @nollipfsense

                      If you didn't notice already starting from today 13/01/2022 my 2.6.0-DEVELOPMENT updated to 2.7.0-DEVELOPMENT.

                      pfSense_2.7.0.png

                      How about that?

                      Nevermind I saw the discussion here:

                      https://forum.netgate.com/topic/169043/what-are-the-road-signs-we-re-getting-close-to-a-released-version-of-2-6/11

                      Look at that...my intuition was right on about a 2.6 release 29days ago...

                      pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                      pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                      DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • DaddyGoD
                        DaddyGo @NollipfSense
                        last edited by

                        @nollipfsense said in FreeBSD 12.3:

                        Look at that...my intuition was right on about a 2.6 release 29days ago...

                        Howdy there,

                        It's been a long time since I've been here, what do you hear about 2.6(?)

                        in addition to this:
                        https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/roadmap#2.6.0

                        postponing the rebuilding of the home pfS box waiting for the miracle

                        BTW:
                        I'm not that excited, because I haven't had much time lately ๐Ÿ˜‰

                        Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                        (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                        NollipfSenseN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • NollipfSenseN
                          NollipfSense @DaddyGo
                          last edited by NollipfSense

                          @daddygo I am currently running pfSense v2.6RC in production mode...upgraded this pass Monday...so far no problem. It even seems that graphs are working in Snort and Suricata in-line mode...big applaud!

                          pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                          pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                          DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DaddyGoD
                            DaddyGo @NollipfSense
                            last edited by

                            @nollipfsense said in FreeBSD 12.3:

                            upgraded this pass Monday...so far no problem.

                            Thanks for the info, I did it today and threw it on an APu4 for a test.... ๐Ÿ˜‰

                            5cd30fd0-c652-4a6b-9996-d40f942c8831-image.png

                            Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                            (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                            NollipfSenseN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • NollipfSenseN
                              NollipfSense @DaddyGo
                              last edited by

                              @daddygo Nice...

                              pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                              pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.