pfblocker 3.1.0_3

Bob.Dig

@mcury true, I had it enabled and now I can't disable it.

jdeloach

Disables and enables just fine on my system.

Just for the record, I'm running pfSense CE 2.6.0 in case that makes a difference.

mcury

Disables and enables just fine on my system.
Just for the record, I'm running pfSense CE 2.6.0 in case that makes a difference.

Hm, strange that its working for you and not for us, but thanks for the info
I'm running 22.01 and pfblocker 3.1.0_3

Gertjan

It gets even better.

It stayed 'checked' after I upgraded from .2 to .3 - I didn't test this behavior while I was using .2

Now at home, I could check it, Save, and it was checked when I re entered the DNSBL page.
I unchecked, Save, move on to somthing else, came back and it was unchecked.

So, @home, using .2, it seems to work just fine.

Btw : because I still don't trusted "GUI's" (that happens when you grow up with Windows since version 1) I also checked the real setting :

<pfsense>
  <installedpackages>
    <pfblockerngdnsblsettings>
      <pfb_dnsbl_rule></pfb_dnsbl_rule>

it is un checked.
If its checked, it would be

     <pfb_dnsbl_rule>on</pfb_dnsbl_rule>

The thing is, I can't install .3 .....
as now its version 3.1.0_4

That what I have now, and it seems to work.

Btw :

Maybe its useful to de select all these before un checking the check box :

fireodo

@mcury said in pfblocker 3.1.0_3:

Hm, strange that its working for you and not for us, but thanks for the info
I'm running 22.01 and pfblocker 3.1.0_3

I just saw in my settings that on the DSNBL-Settings page the section "DNSBL Configuration" is twice ...

Gertjan

@fireodo said in pfblocker 3.1.0_3:

twice

Isn't that a not a reason for an image ?

Like :

Can't see

twice.
Even without glasses.

fireodo

@gertjan said in pfblocker 3.1.0_3:

Isn't that a not a reason for an image ?

See here

fireodo

@gertjan said in pfblocker 3.1.0_3:

Can't see

I dont know why its not the case on your machine ...

Gertjan

@fireodo

Your are running 3.1.0_4 (4 for four) right ?

3 was really had a short live.

fireodo

@gertjan said in pfblocker 3.1.0_3:

Your are running 3.1.0_4 (4 for four) right ?

Now - yes! But the doublette was in 3.1.0_3

Gertjan

All cases closed then

fireodo

@gertjan said in pfblocker 3.1.0_3:

3 was really had a short live.

Yes, BBcan177 reacted very fast ...

mcury

Yes, after upgrading to 3.1.0_4, everything is fine..
Thanks BBcan177 and pfsense team