Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Kvm pfSense 100Mbps instead of gigabit

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Virtualization
    12 Posts 3 Posters 2.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      marius_herta @viragomann
      last edited by

      @viragomann Yes, I tried with Hardware Checksum Offloading both enabled and disabled but it didn't make any difference.

      V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V
        viragomann @marius_herta
        last edited by

        @marius_herta
        It has to be checked, when running on KVM. Save it and reboot the VM.

        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          marius_herta @viragomann
          last edited by

          @viragomann I did that, I rebooted between enabling/disabling it, but the speed was still ~95Mbps regardless of whether it was enabled or disabled.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • V
            viragomann @marius_herta
            last edited by

            @marius_herta said in Kvm pfSense 100Mbps instead of gigabit:

            I ran speedtest cli on the host and the test result was ~95Mbps
            I replaced the modem with a Raspberry Pi 4B and the result of the iperf3 test between the Pi and the host was ~100Mbps

            Did you run this tests on the host itself or on a VM behind pfSense.

            Your LAN NIC is an USB device. Such devices can make much troubles. But that shouldn't be involved in above tests if you did it on the host.

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              marius_herta @viragomann
              last edited by

              @viragomann I did the tests on the host which connects to the internet through pfSense. I don't have other VMs besides the pfSense one.

              V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V
                viragomann @marius_herta
                last edited by

                @marius_herta
                So I would run speedtest cli on the host bare metal to see I it's issue with pfSense.

                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  marius_herta @viragomann
                  last edited by

                  @viragomann I followed your suggestion and this was the result:

                  
                     Speedtest by Ookla
                  
                       Server: RCS & RDS - Bucharest (id = 11494)
                          ISP: Digi Romania
                      Latency:     1.78 ms   (0.17 ms jitter)
                     Download:   923.89 Mbps (data used: 439.6 MB )
                       Upload:   938.74 Mbps (data used: 446.1 MB )
                  Packet Loss:     0.0%
                   Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/f16b7674-c007-4053-b9fb-562bfca3ad89
                  
                  
                  V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    viragomann @marius_herta
                    last edited by

                    @marius_herta
                    No idea, what else should be wrong in pfSense.

                    On my installation I get full 1 Gb/s speed through pfSense running on KVM with virtIO NICs.

                    I still doubt that's an issue with your pfSense.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N
                      netblues @marius_herta
                      last edited by

                      @marius_herta said in Kvm pfSense 100Mbps instead of gigabit:

                      I ran speedtest cli on the host and the test result was ~95Mbps

                      Well, since the test is with the host, and pfsense is not involved, why it is a pfsense issue.

                      (Unless you mean something else)
                      In any case I would steer clear of anything usb.
                      even if it works, its totaly unreliable on the long run, since unpluggin it, or moving port would "make" new interfaces..

                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        marius_herta @netblues
                        last edited by

                        Well, since the test is with the host, and pfsense is not involved, why it is a pfsense issue.

                        The host connects to the internet through the pfSense VM.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.