Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    WireGuard Site-To-Site

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved WireGuard
    5 Posts 3 Posters 873 Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F Offline
      fireix
      last edited by fireix

      This post is deleted!
      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F Offline
        fireix @fireix
        last edited by fireix

        @fireix I can answer my own question :) I needed to add GW at both pfSense-boxes and then a seperate route for each network to point to that gateway. Now I can ping each others subnets.

        Is it this way it is supposed to work? Adding gw-entry and then point each private subnet to that gw?

        I think I have learned a lot today. I just assumed it would "route" automatically.

        I also wonder how to get the LAN-devices to actually follow up on the route. I can communicate from pfSense to pfSense on both networks IF I choose automatic interface - but not from the LAN interface (if I choose ping 10.0.0.2 and LAN-interface).

        UPDATE: And now I found out that.. Had to choose "Upstream gateway" on the WireGuard-interface.

        Bob.DigB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Bob.DigB Offline
          Bob.Dig LAYER 8 @fireix
          last edited by

          @fireix If you haven't checked it out, do so.
          Youtube Video

          F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • F Offline
            fireix @Bob.Dig
            last edited by

            @bob-dig Yeah, found it. It helped me a bit and the rest was just trial-and-error.

            luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • luckman212L Offline
              luckman212 LAYER 8 @fireix
              last edited by

              Yes that's how I do it also. I'm experimenting with FRR now to dynamically discover the routes instead of having to manually define them.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.