Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Filtering DHCP Request (Broadcast) rule vs Multicast Allow=1

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    3 Posts 2 Posters 963 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      eeebbune
      last edited by

      Hello Experties!

      I am curious about DHCP request - respond packet passing Firewall.

      There is a firewall between DHCP Server and Client.
      <<DHCP Server -- Firewall -- DHCP Client>>
      so all of packets transferring through the firewall.

      I created a filter rule for DHCP broadcast,
      2b8912a7-f07b-45ce-bea5-c64d5a245b9a-image.png

      At that time, rule trigger has 0/0Btye.
      I thought Firewall just passing DHCP broadcast because it was 0.

      However, after I create a config 'multicast_allow = 1'

      6e374103-197a-46b1-8fcb-914d7338da74-image.png

      Traffics are triggered to the DHCP broadcast rule.
      0/0 byte to 0/34kiB.

      Why so different?
      Before I created multicast allow, DHCP broadcast doesn't work? (But everyone can get a dhcp ip address from the dhcp server, no issues happened.)

      I am dying to know what makes this differences.

      NogBadTheBadN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • NogBadTheBadN
        NogBadTheBad @eeebbune
        last edited by NogBadTheBad

        @eeebbune 255.255.255.255 != multicast, it’s a broadcast to any host on the lan segment.

        Andy

        1 x Netgate SG-4860 - 3 x Linksys LGS308P - 1 x Aruba InstantOn AP22

        E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          eeebbune @NogBadTheBad
          last edited by

          @nogbadthebad

          That's what I mean..
          Even though it has different ip range, why it shows me different result, that was my curiousity.

          It looks like somehow related.
          Too far to understand PF Firewall for me...

          Maybe it was just coincidence..

          Anyway, thank you for your reply.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.