Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    pfBlockerNG-devel v3.1.0_7 / v3.1.0_14

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    50 Posts 14 Posters 11.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • fireodoF
      fireodo @jdeloach
      last edited by fireodo

      @jdeloach said in pfBlockerNG-devel v3.1.0_7 / v3.1.0_14:

      That's the issue, there is no upgrade available. 3.1.0_8 is not available.

      In my understanding the 3.1.0_7 is the actual version for pfsense 2.6.0 and the 3.1.0_8 is the actual version for pfsense+ 22.05.
      Both versions 3.1.0_7 (for 2.6.0) and 3.1.0_8 (for 22.05) are heavyly owerwoked.
      The version 3.1.0_6 on 2.6.0 had the same codebasis as 3.1.0_7 on 22.05.
      The 3.1.0_14 is for the developer versions based on freeBSD 14 and PHP 8.1

      Please correct me if I'm wrong.

      Kettop Mi4300YL CPU: i5-4300Y @ 1.60GHz RAM: 8GB Ethernet Ports: 4
      SSD: SanDisk pSSD-S2 16GB (ZFS) WiFi: WLE200NX
      pfsense 2.8.0 CE
      Packages: Apcupsd, Cron, Iftop, Iperf, LCDproc, Nmap, pfBlockerNG, RRD_Summary, Shellcmd, Snort, Speedtest, System_Patches.

      BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • BBcan177B
        BBcan177 Moderator @fireodo
        last edited by

        @fireodo

        Yes that is correct. One of the pfsense devs committed a release for pfSense plus and caused the version mismatch.

        The devs also told me yesterday that there was a build error so _8 didn't build. But they informed me that it should have been available since yesterday. If you still don't see it. Post your hardware specs ie amd/Intel and pfSense version.

        "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

        Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
        Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
        Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
        • S
          Squuiid
          last edited by Squuiid

          Ugh. Updated from a stable 3.1.0_7 to 3.1.0_8 last night and now DNS stops working after a few hours of uptime. This is running at a school and unbeknownst to me kids are sitting exams today!
          Easy way to roll back or troubleshoot? Restarting Unbound does nothing. Any help would be hugely appreciated. Running 22.05 on a Negate 6100 Max (amd64).

          Alejo 0A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Alejo 0A
            Alejo 0 @Squuiid
            last edited by Alejo 0

            @squuiid

            You should always create a backup before updating any package in case this happens hence restoring your latest backup config is an easy way to fix the issue. Edit: I was wrong, see @SteveITS replies below

            If you don't know how to restore your settings from backup:

            Diagnostics > Backup & Restore > Restore backup section > Restore Configuration

            If you don't have a backup I am out of ideas, sorry.

            The darker the night, the brighter the stars.

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Alejo 0A
              Alejo 0 @Squuiid
              last edited by

              @squuiid
              I am having the same issues with the DNS not working after the update but restarting unbound does fix my issue althought restarting the service every time is definitely not ideal either.

              The darker the night, the brighter the stars.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                SteveITS Galactic Empire @Alejo 0
                last edited by

                @alejo-0 The config backup doesn't back up package code, in fact when it restores it will restore the latest package. I'm pretty sure it will reinstall them even if already installed and you're just restoring, but am not positive offhand.

                @Squuiid Are you getting an "address already in use" error logged?

                Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
                Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

                Alejo 0A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Alejo 0A
                  Alejo 0 @SteveITS
                  last edited by

                  @steveits

                  @steveits said in pfBlockerNG-devel v3.1.0_7 / v3.1.0_14:

                  The config backup doesn't back up package code

                  I think it does, unless you check the Skip packages option which is the default. At least, that is my understanding. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

                  37f41005-ac88-41aa-981f-c9d4a8b16a8a-image.png

                  The darker the night, the brighter the stars.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    SteveITS Galactic Empire @Alejo 0
                    last edited by

                    @alejo-0 That will back up the package configuration but not the binary files or PHP code. Just take a look at the the .xml file.

                    Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                    When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
                    Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • BBcan177B
                      BBcan177 Moderator
                      last edited by BBcan177

                      Been seeing some reports of DNS issues with pfSense 22.05 and v3.1.0_8. I can't reproduce this on my test box, but will have it run more tests to see if I can reproduce.

                      For those that are having this specific issue in 22.x ONLY:
                      Here is the previous pfb_unbound.py version which you could try and see if this resolves the issue.

                      Run this command to download the file and then restart Unbound for it to take effect:

                      curl -o /var/unbound/pfb_unbound.py "https://gist.githubusercontent.com/BBcan177/83a6f4002ede77e00de7f8c67edb7421/raw"
                      

                      Thanks!

                      "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                      Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                      Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                      Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                      • S SteveITS referenced this topic on
                      • T
                        TheXman @BBcan177
                        last edited by

                        Hi @bbcan177
                        For those of us experiencing DNS issues with Python Mode after upgrading to pfB-NG 3.1.0_7 on pfSense 2.6.0, could you also provide that version's pfb_unbound.py file?

                        Re:
                        https://forum.netgate.com/topic/176362/pfblockerng-devel-v3-1-0_7-update-unbound-issue/13

                        BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • BBcan177B
                          BBcan177 Moderator @TheXman
                          last edited by

                          @thexman it's the same file. I didn't see any reports about 2.6.

                          "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                          Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                          Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                          Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                          T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T
                            TheXman @BBcan177
                            last edited by

                            @bbcan177
                            Thanks! I can't wait to see if it will allow me to go back to Python Mode.

                            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A AberDino referenced this topic on
                            • A
                              AberDino @TheXman
                              last edited by

                              @thexman said in pfBlockerNG-devel v3.1.0_7 / v3.1.0_14:

                              Thanks! I can't wait to see if it will allow me to go back to Python Mode.

                              Fixed it for me 🙂

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T
                                TheXman @BBcan177
                                last edited by TheXman

                                @bbcan177
                                After making a backup of the 3.1.0_7 file, I switched back to Python Mode, downloaded the old python file using the link that you provided, and did a force reload.

                                The very first thing that I noticed was that I no longer got an error saying that pfSense was unable to check its version. Then, I did several of the things that would usually cause unbound to stop responding. So far, I'm happy to say, Python Mode is working quite well with the 3.1.0_6 python file. As a matter of fact, I could swear that 3.1.0_7 with the 3.1.0_6 python file is using less CPU. I also don't see my state table filling up with FIN_WAIT states from RDNC (port 953). Lastly, I don't see the error in the unbound log that I would see right before becoming unresponsive, it would say something like "invalidateQueryInCache: qinfo not found in cache".

                                In any case, I'll keep monitoring. Thanks for providing the old python file.

                                BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • BBcan177B
                                  BBcan177 Moderator @TheXman
                                  last edited by BBcan177

                                  @thexman thanks for reporting back!

                                  I was waiting for someone to post what error they were seeing and I didn't get any helpful details. So I think that bit of info that you now provided helps diagnose the issue. I will post a fix for testing once I have it ready.

                                  "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                  Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                  Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                  Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                  T S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • T
                                    TheXman @BBcan177
                                    last edited by TheXman

                                    @bbcan177

                                    Awesome! I'm happy to do any testing that I can.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • S
                                      seanmcb @BBcan177
                                      last edited by

                                      @bbcan177 said in pfBlockerNG-devel v3.1.0_7 / v3.1.0_14:

                                      I was waiting for someone to post what error they were seeing and I didn't get any helpful details. So I think that bit of info that you now provided helps diagnose the issue. I will post a fix for testing once I have it ready.

                                      I'm a bit confused as to the current status of things... The current version I see available is 3.1.0_9. Does it have a known bug related to DNS getting sometimes broken? Thanks.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • fireodoF fireodo referenced this topic on
                                      • BBcan177B BBcan177 unpinned this topic on
                                      • GertjanG Gertjan referenced this topic on
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.