• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

10 Gbps issue with pfSense on Proxmox

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Virtualization
8 Posts 4 Posters 2.1k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N
    Nyxtorm
    last edited by Nyxtorm May 25, 2023, 6:28 PM May 25, 2023, 6:28 PM

    Hello,

    I'm currently trying to understand a strange behavior with my pfSense CE 2.6 virtualized on Proxmox VE 7.4-3. I've been tearing my hair out for days now. 😂

    My ISP router (Freebox Delta w/ 10G-EPON, Free ISP in France) is wired directly to my Proxmox hypervisor via a passive 10Gbps DAC.

    So I have a Linux bridge (vmbr2) connected to the corresponding SFP+ port.

    Attached to this bridge are my pfSense WAN and two test VMs. For each of my tests, I download directly from my ISP's router, which is capable of generating data on the fly to test local speeds.

    I put my tests in Pastebin because I'm marked as a spammer: https://pastebin.com/raw/qxAUGynQ

    What I tried:

    • Test all possibilities with Hardware Checksum Offloading, TSO and LRO
    • Test with or without PCIe passthrough on pfSense, maybe a small difference but really not a big deal
    • Reinstall clean pfSense (test with CE 2.6, Plus 23.01 and Plus 23.05 versions)
    • Test of E1000, Realtek and VMX drivers
    • Test with multiqueue (4 or 8) with 8 vCPU, no difference and I can reach 10Gbps with only 2 vCPU and without multiqueue without any problem.
    • Test with OPNsense, throughputs significantly higher, but no major difference.
    • Test with i440fx and q35 machine
    • Test with Jumbo frames (MTU 9000)

    Proxmox handles the 10Gbps link very well, since I can reach them without any problem as soon as I stop going through pfSense. I've also run a number of speedtest tests, which show the same behavior towards external servers: speeds seem to be "throttled" as soon as I go through my clean pfSense virtual machine (clean installation with no modifications).

    I thought it was a FreeBSD limitation, but a FreeBSD installation perfectly exploits the 10Gbps link.

    So I'm a bit lost, I'm throwing a bottle into the sea in case someone has the same experience and, more importantly, the solution.

    My config :

    • ISP :
      • Freebox Delta 10G-EPON 8Gbps/700Mbps
    • Hypervisor :
      • Proxmox VE 7.4-3
      • AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
      • 64 GB RAM
      • Motherboard MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI
      • 1 To NVMe
      • 2 x SFP+ 1/2.5/10Gbps (BCM57810S)
      • 1 x RJ45 2.5 Gbps (RTL8125B, not used)

    A brief overview of the network part concerned : pfsense_issue

    Sorry for my English and thanks for your help ! :)

    N N 2 Replies Last reply May 26, 2023, 1:49 PM Reply Quote 0
    • N
      Nyxtorm @Nyxtorm
      last edited by May 26, 2023, 1:49 PM

      New tests :

      • Test new VM Untangle NG Firewall (Arista) : I'm able to use 10Gbps, including through the router, but... there is a bug if IPv6 gateway is on fe80::/10, no default route created)
      • Test new VM pfSense with OS set to "Other" and UEFI, same problematic behavior
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        Cool_Corona
        last edited by May 27, 2023, 9:33 AM

        Plug your pfsense WAN directly into the ISP modem LAN and bridge the modem.

        Test again.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          NollipfSense @Nyxtorm
          last edited by May 29, 2023, 3:45 PM

          @Nyxtorm Agree with Cool_Corona...please use this guide and make sure WAN passthrough to pfSense: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/virtualize-proxmox-ve.html

          pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
          pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            MikeFromOz
            last edited by Aug 17, 2023, 11:53 AM

            I can't find my cheat-sheet but this should do:

            Procedure to bridge out the Freebox Delta: https://assistance.free.fr/articles/passer-votre-freebox-en-mode-bridge-utilisation-avancee-747
            Procedure including pfsense: https://www.osnet.eu/en/node/752

            Please be aware that:
            -Free doesn't guarantee you'll get the advertised speed... I generally maxed out at 8.5GB, requiring ~3 simultaneous downloads to get there (individual streams maxed at 4.3GB from memory). I had a suspicion that I could get better single thread downloads with a CPU with higher single thread performance but I never had the hardware to test.
            -Free shares bandwidth between subscribers e.g. it might be 10GB to your building, not your living room
            -Internet speeds routinely change through the day with Free
            -Ping times are much higher than with Orange (which made it feel slower than 1GB with Orange)

            N 1 Reply Last reply Aug 18, 2023, 10:36 AM Reply Quote 0
            • N
              Nyxtorm @MikeFromOz
              last edited by Aug 18, 2023, 10:36 AM

              @MikeFromOz,

              My problem wasn't a problem with global speed, but a huge difference in upload speed between the SFP+ connector and the RJ45 connector, a very abnormal behavior.
              My problem was solved by simply changing ISP after weeks of waiting for answers from Free. I deliberately left dev tickets open, I never got any answer from Free, other than a high level of support who informed me that they were not trained at all regarding this very little used SFP+ LAN port, and the vast majority of customers use the classic RJ45 port, and some of those who use the SFP+ port don't make precise measurements. Since my first post, I've done a lot of tests and ended up with a direct single-mode fiber cable with two 10GBase-LR LC modules, no change, always inconsistent data displayed by FreeboxOS, and as soon as the SFP+ link was negotiated to 10Gbps, the problems started.

              Free wasn't interested in looking for a solution, so I changed ISPs.

              Sorry for my English.

              M 1 Reply Last reply Aug 18, 2023, 11:35 AM Reply Quote 0
              • M
                MikeFromOz @Nyxtorm
                last edited by MikeFromOz Aug 18, 2023, 11:41 AM Aug 18, 2023, 11:35 AM

                @Nyxtorm

                Absolutely no issues on language... you're perfectly understandable.

                I was running... Freebox Delta SFP+ ----- DAC ---- SFP+ Chelsio NIC --- PFSense---- SFP+ Chelsio NIC ----- DAC ---- Mikrotik Switch

                It was solid at 10Gb/s although (the act of) plugging the SFP+ connector into the Freebox would cause it to reboot. (not enough power for the connector?). I saw the same behaviour when plugging my NAS into the SFP+ port on the freebox via a DAC.

                Free's support was poo but the developers of the freebox did put out some great material. There were also some good forum posts.

                If I was going to pick another FR ISP I would go with Orange 1 giga. I didn't like using PPPOE but it worked. They were offering 2.5 giga but you couldn't get rid of the livebox (which is total poo) like you could with 1 giga.

                N 1 Reply Last reply Aug 22, 2023, 3:45 PM Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  Nyxtorm @MikeFromOz
                  last edited by Aug 22, 2023, 3:45 PM

                  Hello @MikeFromOz,

                  Indeed, I went to Orange with the Max 2 Gbps/800 Mbps offer, which is extremely stable, in my area anyway.

                  I use the 2.5 Gbps port of the Livebox 6 with pfSense to benefit from the 2 Gbps, even if I have a ready installation with an ONU SFP GPON 2.5 Gbps module because I sometimes had problems with the link re-establishing during a physical disconnection test. I totally agree that Free's hardware is very good and much more "flexible".

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                    This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                    consent.not_received