Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New pfblockerNG install Database Sanity check Failed

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    31 Posts 8 Posters 860 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      marchand.guy @marchand.guy
      last edited by marchand.guy

      @marchand-guy Verified hypothesis. The code always reported true before 3.2.8.
      Good catch

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • tinfoilmattT
        tinfoilmatt
        last edited by

        Looks like dev (@BBcan177) is already reviewing. Good teamwork, y'all.

        Responsible commit here. Remark indicates it was a cleanup commit. I don't have the coding skills to say for sure, but this pfblocker.php update and this pfblocker_alerts.php update look odd for some reason, in addition to whatever the pfblockerng.sh L1281 fix exposed.

        @marcosm

        BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • BBcan177B
          BBcan177 Moderator @tinfoilmatt
          last edited by

          I think I found the last issue. The "masterfile" is a list of Filename/IPs. The "mastercat" file is just the IPs only. So it was trying to grep -v (exclude) any lines that start with the placeholder IP. So we need to change the masterfile to the mastercat in this line.

          Try to change this line from:

          From:
          s1="$(grep -cv ^${ip_placeholder2}$ ${masterfile})"

          To:
          s1="$(grep -cv ^${ip_placeholder2}$ ${mastercat})"

          "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

          Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
          Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
          Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

          T M S 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 4
          • T
            TheXman @BBcan177
            last edited by

            @BBcan177 Thank you!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              Maltz @BBcan177
              last edited by

              @BBcan177 Success!

              Database Sanity check [ PASSED ]

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                marchand.guy @Maltz
                last edited by

                @Maltz How?
                No change on pfsense.

                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  Maltz @marchand.guy
                  last edited by Maltz

                  @marchand-guy I manually made the change to the shell script that BBcan177 described.

                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    slu @BBcan177
                    last edited by

                    @BBcan177 so next step is a new package for pfSense?

                    pfSense Gold subscription

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      marchand.guy @Maltz
                      last edited by

                      @Maltz said in New pfblockerNG install Database Sanity check Failed:

                      @marchand-guy I manually made the change to the shell script that BBcan177 described.

                      Ok, done as well.
                      Thanks

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • tinfoilmattT
                        tinfoilmatt
                        last edited by tinfoilmatt

                        Thanks, @BBcan177.

                        Some clear confusion ITT re pfSense system version and pfBlockerNG package version numbers. For posterity:

                        pfSense 2.7.2 CE - Database Sanity check issue not present, because pfBlockerNG and pfBlockerNG-devel packages are both on "RELENG_2_7_2" branch of pfSense / FreeBSD-Ports

                        pfSense 2.8 CE - Database Sanity check regression, possibly because branch updated to "devel" for both packages?

                        (RELENG_2_7_2 branch: pfBlockerNG/pfBlockerNG-devel)
                        (devel branch: pfBlockerNG/pfBlockerNG-devel)

                        I think that's what's happened. Maybe someone can give me a sanity check. 😜

                        The package version numbers appear to have been realigned in pfSense 2.8 CE however. The last package versions of pfBlockerNG and pfBockerNG-devel on pfSense 2.7.2 CE were 3.2.8 and 3.2.0_20 respectively.

                        But under 2.8 CE, both packages are now currently on version 3.2.8 (pfBlockerNG and pfBlockerNG-devel).

                        Will both packages continue to be maintained separately and we should expect version numbers to potentially diverge again?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.