Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    communicating via vswitch from vms in bridges

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved L2/Switching/VLANs
    15 Posts 2 Posters 597 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      compuser @patient0
      last edited by

      @patient0

      I ran tcpdump -i vmbr6 on host2. I see BOOTP requests from VM2 mac but no response from a DHCP server. I cant see any BOOTP broadcasts when I run tcpdump on host1. Could it be that the requests are not traversing the switch? On robot server, I have
      ipv4 - * - src/172.16.6.0/24 - dest/172.16.6.0/24 - accept on both hosts and no deny rules.

      08:06:02.274090 IP 0.0.0.0.bootpc > 255.255.255.255.bootps: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from bc:24:11:4a:07:7a (oui Unknown), length 293
      08:07:06.457056 IP 0.0.0.0.bootpc > 255.255.255.255.bootps: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from bc:24:11:4a:07:7a (oui Unknown), length 293
      08:07:26.689884 ARP, Request who-has 172.16.6.3 tell 0.0.0.0, length 42
      08:07:26.689888 ARP, Reply 172.16.6.3 is-at 10:7c:61:4e:78:e5 (oui Unknown), length 28
      08:07:26.689904 ARP, Reply 172.16.6.3 is-at 12:3d:86:98:ce:d9 (oui Unknown), length 28
      

      I have set MTU of 1400 in 1) network device of VM3 in proxmox 2) for the bridge and vlan interface on both hosts and 3) on the vmbr6 interface in pfsense

      patient0P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • patient0P
        patient0 @compuser
        last edited by patient0

        @compuser said in communicating via vswitch from vms in bridges:

        Could it be that the requests are not traversing the switch?

        I don't have experience with vSwitch between dedicated servers, according to the internet it should work just fine.

        What virtualisation software do you use for the VMs? Maybe it's more a bridge issue.

        Are there any firewall rules on the hosts itself? And can see the package arrive on the enp5s0 on host2 and enp5s0 on host1?

        C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          compuser @patient0
          last edited by

          @patient0

          I am using proxmox. I am running ubuntu 24.04. I created a bridge in /etc/network/interfaces like this.

          on host 1

          auto vmbr6
          iface vmbr6 inet static
                  address 172.16.6.1/24
                  bridge-ports enp5s0.4006
                  #vlan-raw-device enp5s0
                  bridge-stp off
                  bridge-fd 0
                  mtu 1400
          
          auto enp5s0.4006
          iface enp5s0.4006 inet manual
                  vlan_raw_device enp5s0
                  mtu 1400
          

          and on host 2

          auto vmbr6
          iface vmbr6 inet static
                  address 172.16.6.3/24
                  bridge-ports enp5s0.4006
                  #vlan-raw-device enp5s0
                  bridge-stp off
                  bridge-fd 0
                  mtu 1400
          
          auto enp5s0.4006
          iface enp5s0.4006 inet manual
                  vlan_raw_device enp5s0
                  mtu 1400
          

          No I dont have any firewall rules on the hosts. Just the robot server rules. The VMs are stock cloud images from ubuntu that I spun up just for this testing. I havent enabled ufw or anything else on them.

          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            compuser @compuser
            last edited by

            Another datapoint. dhcp server is reachable from host1 but not from host2

            host1 ~ # nmap --script broadcast-dhcp-discover
            Starting Nmap 7.93 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2025-06-15 21:21 CEST
            Pre-scan script results:
            | broadcast-dhcp-discover:
            | Response 1 of 5:
            | Interface: vmbr6
            | IP Offered: 172.16.6.11
            | DHCP Message Type: DHCPOFFER
            | Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
            | Router: 172.16.6.2
            | Domain Name Server: 172.16.6.2
            | Domain Name: domain.name
            | IP Address Lease Time: 2h00m00s
            | Server Identifier: 172.16.6.2

            host2 ~ # nmap --script broadcast-dhcp-discover
            Starting Nmap 7.93 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2025-06-15 21:32 CEST
            WARNING: No targets were specified, so 0 hosts scanned.
            Nmap done: 0 IP addresses (0 hosts up) scanned in 10.29 seconds

            At the same time I can ping from host1 to bridge in host2
            host1 ~ # ping 172.16.6.3
            PING 172.16.6.3 (172.16.6.3) 56(84) bytes of data.
            64 bytes from 172.16.6.3: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.44 ms
            64 bytes from 172.16.6.3: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.718 ms
            64 bytes from 172.16.6.3: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.696 ms
            ^C
            --- 172.16.6.3 ping statistics ---
            3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2033ms
            rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.696/0.951/1.439/0.345 ms

            and host2 is able to ping bridge in host1
            host2 ~ # ping 172.16.6.1
            PING 172.16.6.1 (172.16.6.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
            64 bytes from 172.16.6.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.350 ms
            64 bytes from 172.16.6.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.630 ms
            64 bytes from 172.16.6.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.413 ms
            64 bytes from 172.16.6.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.648 ms
            ^C
            --- 172.16.6.1 ping statistics ---
            4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3096ms
            rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.350/0.510/0.648/0.130 ms

            Any ideas on how I can troubleshoot this?

            C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              compuser @compuser
              last edited by

              @patient0 Turns out I need to add a firewall rule on proxmox1 that allows udp requests from 0.0.0.0/32 to 255.255.255.255/32. Now VM2 is able to get the dhcp lease. But is this safe? What will prevent anyone outside from reaching my dhcp server.

              patient0P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • patient0P
                patient0 @compuser
                last edited by patient0

                @compuser

                @compuser said in communicating via vswitch from vms in bridges:

                Turns out I need to add a firewall rule on proxmox1 that allows udp requests from 0.0.0.0/32 to 255.255.255.255/32

                That is news to me, never seen these two. 0.0.0.0/32 matches only 0.0.0.0 but that is not a thing (I thought).
                Edit: Unless that's another way to write 0.0.0.0, which for services and apps means listen to every interface.

                But: does that mean you have firewall rules on Proxmox (see my earlier question)?

                In general: if your hosts are accessible from the outside, you will need firewall rule.

                C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  compuser @patient0
                  last edited by compuser

                  @patient0 Sorry. I used the wrong terminology. I had to apply the firewall rule on hetzner firewall for host 1 to allow the broadcast traffic for dhcp request from vm on host2. I am not using the firewall within proxmox app. I am using firewall rules in pfsense which is my dhcp server. Does this answer your question?

                  Regarding the IP address itself, the src and destination matches with what you would see on the packet capture though.

                  However, I am noticing that the problem is not entirely resolved. The VM is getting its lease but for some reason the dns is not getting registered in pfsense. VM1 on host1 has its lease and dns registered automatically. I can also do a nslookup from pfsense diagnostics to retrieve the IP for VM1 but I cant do the same for VM2. Any idea on what I might be missing. From host2, I can see that port 53 is open too. What could be preventing pfsense from registering the dns of VM2 even though it is leasing the IP.

                  nmap -sU 172.16.6.2
                  Starting Nmap 7.93 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2025-06-16 07:22 CEST
                  Nmap scan report for 172.16.6.2
                  Host is up (0.00066s latency).
                  Not shown: 998 open|filtered udp ports (no-response)
                  PORT    STATE SERVICE
                  53/udp  open  domain
                  123/udp open  ntp
                  MAC Address: BC:24:11:61:53:E6 (Unknown)
                  

                  Thanks a bunch for your time!

                  patient0P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • patient0P
                    patient0 @compuser
                    last edited by

                    @compuser registering the client is thing between the DHCP server and the unbound server on pfSense.

                    Do you see the DHCP lease for VMs on host two on the pfSense? And are the VMs on host2 using pfSense for DNS queries?

                    C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      compuser @patient0
                      last edited by

                      @patient0
                      Yes, I can see the DHCP lease but the DNS lookup fails. The host is using the dns server correctly. Not sure what prevented the dns registration in pfsense.

                      https://imgur.com/a/fegBppv

                      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        compuser @compuser
                        last edited by compuser

                        Hi @patient0 . would you have any thoughts on why the dns registration might not be happening. Shouldnt pfsense be doing it behind the scenes automatically. Does it do any verification that might be failing. I did try opening up the hetzner firewall on host2, hoping that any host verification might be getting blocked, and that didnt help either.

                        patient0P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • patient0P
                          patient0 @compuser
                          last edited by

                          @compuser if host test can't even be resolved on pfSense then it won't work on the client.

                          Which pfSense version and which DHCP server are you using?

                          https://imgur.com/a/fegBppv

                          Can you insert picture directly?

                          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            compuser @patient0
                            last edited by

                            I got it to work. It had to do with not setting mtu of 1400. I can now do dns lookup and it works! Thank you for your suggestions.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.