Endpoint-independent Outbound NAT (eimnat) rules

marcosm

When testing the PS5 and Switch 2 I did not need to check "Static Port". To achieve NAT Type 2/B I only checked EIM-NAT and configured UPnP.

luckman212

@marcosm Thanks, I'm testing with 25.11.r.20251118.1708 now

luckman212

@marcosm Is UPnP still needed though? I thought part of the appeal of EIM NAT was that we didn't need UPnP...

I enabled just eim, flushed my state table and ran a few online tests, but not sure it's working for me... all sites are reporting me as being behind a "Port Restricted Cone NAT"

eg https://natchecker.com or https://whatsmynat.com

d0ff601f-2ead-4000-82b6-9891ed9c8b6e-screenshot_wZ6bwauZ.png

I also tested with some commandline tools I found, e.g. stunner and nat-detect

With EIMNAT checkbox enabled

$ nat-detect
   nat_type: PortRestrictedCone
public_addr: 70.18.xxx.xxx:26787

Tested again without EIMNAT, and it reports symmetric:

$ nat-detect
   nat_type: Symmetric
public_addr: 70.18.xxx.xxx:46689

So it's definitely changing the behavior. Not sure if it should be possible to achieve FullCone however...

Bob.Dig

I did the upgrade to the RC this morning, coming from 25.07.1. I then enabled Endpoint-independent Outbound NAT for my machine and pfSense crashed. And it crashed on every boot so I had to use the zfs-snapshot feature.

Dump header from device: /dev/gpt/swap1
  Architecture: amd64
  Architecture Version: 4
  Dump Length: 381952
  Blocksize: 512
  Compression: none
  Dumptime: 2025-11-19 10:51:17 +0100
  Hostname: pfSense.internal
  Magic: FreeBSD Text Dump
  Version String: FreeBSD 16.0-CURRENT #33 plus-RELENG_25_11-n256497-084b5f7b7bcd: Tue Nov 18 17:18:00 UTC 2025
    root@pfsense-build-release-amd64-1.eng.atx.netgate.com:/var/jenkins/workspace/pfSense-Plus-s
  Panic String: page fault
  Dump Parity: 1574524171
  Bounds: 0
  Dump Status: good

I saved the dumps if they are of interest.

I will give 25.11 RC another chance without using this feature.

luckman212

@Bob.Dig could you post a screenshot of how you configured your EIMNAT rule? Did you have Static Port checked? Seems like you're hitting the same bug I encountered before.

Bob.Dig

@luckman212 Yep, I had static port enabled too.

marcosm

@Bob.Dig The crash can be uploaded here:
https://nc.netgate.com/nextcloud/s/FGaJJ3bHDTnTi5Q

@luckman212 EIM may not be sufficient because as I understand it EIM only deals with the mapping. There is still the matter of allowing (e.g. inbound) connections through the filter which UPnP helps with. FWIW I didn't see the Switch 2 even try UPnP. With EIM (no port forwards, static port unchecked) it showed NAT Type B, without EIM it showed NAT Type D.

Bob.Dig

@marcosm said in Endpoint-independent Outbound NAT (eimnat) rules:

The crash can be uploaded here:

Done.

luckman212

@Bob.Dig Thank you for being another person on the internet with this problem. I'm used to being the only one with weird edge case bugs.

Bob.Dig

@luckman212 I think you are one of the few early testers.

Besides this new NAT-feature, everything works fine so far.