Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    WebGUI dying under heavy load (Internal Server Error 500 etc.) ?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved webGUI
    39 Posts 8 Posters 16.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      JesperDJ
      last edited by

      Ok.. the results with the new HW

      HW: P4 2,5Ghz, 256MB DDR2, Onboard GB NICs

      Config: 100% default

      pfSense:
      Max speed = 60MBit/s
      Payload = 100%
      System unstabel!
      WebGUI = unreachable

      m0n0wall:
      Max speed = 85MBit/s (the switch couldt handle more, trying another GB Switch tommorrow)
      Payload = 30%
      System  very stabel!
      WebGUI = 100% functioning

      seems 2 me that pfSense has a problem?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        sullrich
        last edited by

        You are not specifying which type of NICS.  Please specify your NIC types.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          databeestje
          last edited by

          So far I have been able to push ~400Mbps through a dual port Intel GigE in a P3 1Ghz and 22Mbits+ through a via rhine(vr0)/3com 2000-T (sk0) combination on a Via Eden 933.

          Then again, I have not been trying to access the webgui.
          A p3 1Ghz doing 400Mbits is about ~55% interrupt. So that one doesn't die from load.

          The Via with 22Mbits and a traffic shaper was pretty loaded but the queues page at 22Mbits was still accessible.

          One point of thought though. This testing was performed somewhere in the pre RC1-ish days.
          I have not ran benchmarks one rc2 and above yet.

          Something may indeed be amiss.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            JesperDJ
            last edited by

            @sullrich, actually that isnt important in this case, i have tryied with 3Coms, Realteks & Onboards both 100MBits and 1GBits.. the difference is less than 2MBit/s when im using pfSense..

            But if you need the exect type of NICs, please let me know.

            The interrupt is 99/100% when pfSense is doing 60MBit/s on my actual system.. wich was; P4 2,5Ghz, 256MB DDR2

            and perhaps your (databeestje) results where on some RC1-ish, but in my oppinion the newer version shouldnt be slower?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              sullrich
              last edited by

              This is a known problem.  I've posted to the freebsd lists but nobody has responded yet.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                JesperDJ
                last edited by

                I have now tryied with a different setup:

                pfSense testet with:

                Motherboard: MSI MS-6723
                CPU P3 933Mhz
                Memory: 256MB SD DDR 400
                NICs: Realtek 8139

                Now i was able to get aproxx 96MBit (i guess the NICs couldnt handle more…)
                Interrupt load was 83%.. leaving the system 100% stable and accessable..

                maybe the other HW wasnt 100% compatible with pfSense.. or?

                is there any recommandations wich HW to use ie. wich chipset, cpu, mem, nics etc?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  rsw686
                  last edited by

                  Thats interesting you and databeestje both had good throughput on a P3 system. Your P4 box didn't work as well. Wonder if its the processor or the NIC cards.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    sullrich
                    last edited by

                    That is VERY interesting that you are able to saturate the ethernet and access the system with different nics.  That makes me wonder.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      JesperDJ
                      last edited by

                      @sullrich, i didnt understand your answer?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • H
                        hoba
                        last edited by

                        It's just interesting that there was such a difference between your setups. From the tests we did with different hardware/nics it looks like the problem always occurs when cpu is going to 100% no matter what hardware we used. Some nics will reach the 100% level sooner or later due to causing more or less cpu load at the same system but the problem was more or less always the same.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          JesperDJ
                          last edited by

                          I belive that the difference in througput was so different becouse the drivers wasnt correct.

                          I have tryed Celeron 633-S370/P3 933-S370 with good performance and with bad, depending on the motherboard, and the same with P4/C4 systems,
                          but in any case the type of NIC´s wasnt important.. the diffenrence between a Realtek 8139 and 3Com/Intel etc. was below 2-3MBit/s

                          Thats why i ask:

                          What HW is the best to use? What is pfSense written to?

                          Im no router/pc newbie, but i am pretty new in *nix environment..

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • H
                            hoba
                            last edited by

                            Whatever works with freebsd 6.1 as pfSense is based on that. Did you try a biosupgrade on the box with the poor performance? Also maybe some Biossettings might improve perfomance.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              JesperDJ
                              last edited by

                              Yes i tryed upgrading the BIOS and also some bios-settings.. didnt have any effect..

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                davidemiccone
                                last edited by

                                @hoba:

                                Btw, I have Via C3 Nehemia 1 GHz miniITX based systems that can deliver 100 mbit/s wirespeed at around 80% CPU load (last time I tested).

                                I'm going to buy an appliance and I'm trying to find the best price/performance solution.

                                Your Via C3 Nehemia 1 Ghz miniITX base system from which manufacturer? (Hacom?) Which model? (Lex Neo?)

                                Any conseil will be appreciated.

                                Thanks in advance.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • H
                                  hoba
                                  last edited by

                                  It's a standard via miniitx board with vr nics that I put into a dual travla 1U case (actually 2 boards in the same 1U case). It's build from pieces and was not a full system that I ordered.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.