• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

$150: Make server-pools work in failover mode (as advertised by GUI)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Expired/Withdrawn Bounties
5 Posts 3 Posters 4.4k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L
    ltning
    last edited by Jun 20, 2007, 7:34 PM

    Hi,

    currently slbd only supports round-robin for server pools. The GUI currently advertises a failover mode. I need this to work as advertised, in addition to a way to see which system is currently active (in status page?) and - optionally - a quick way to toggle which system is used.

    After failing over to a lower-priority host, it should go back to the next higher-priority as soon as it is available again. The way it currently works with the "panic host" is the behavior I want, but I don't want to use that feature to achieve this – a "panic host" is still desired.

    Any takers?

    /Eirik

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • B
      billm
      last edited by Jun 28, 2007, 5:01 PM

      @ltning:

      Hi,

      currently slbd only supports round-robin for server pools. The GUI currently advertises a failover mode. I need this to work as advertised, in addition to a way to see which system is currently active (in status page?) and - optionally - a quick way to toggle which system is used.

      FYI, that was a bug in implementation.  The server load balancing already has an implemented site down feature.

      @ltning:

      After failing over to a lower-priority host, it should go back to the next higher-priority as soon as it is available again. The way it currently works with the "panic host" is the behavior I want, but I don't want to use that feature to achieve this – a "panic host" is still desired.

      Any takers?

      /Eirik

      For whoever considers this bounty…it'll require C skills and PHP skills to implement.

      --Bill

      pfSense core developer
      blog - http://www.ucsecurity.com/
      twitter - billmarquette

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        sanjay_arora
        last edited by Jul 11, 2007, 7:09 PM

        Hello All

        I would like to see a scenario where one can define multiple pools, consisting of different WANs, supporting the following:

        • Multiple pools, operable in round-robin or failover or both modes.
        • System should be aware of bandwidth capacity of each link and allocate round-robin share accordingly.
        • Traffic-Shaping should work on each WAN just as it works on the main WAN now. However, traffic-shaping rules should be different for each WAN & seperately configurable. Of couse, the user may simply check a box that replicates the main WAN shaping rules on one or more WAN.
        • Time & port based firewalling should somehow be available with the pools e.g. I would like to see one of my high-bandwidth links that is free/unbilled during the night allow all the traffic that is banned from it during the day.

        I would be willing to add 100$ to the bounty provided I get all the functionality that I want. Don't really know if I have put it right. Request if someone takes this up, post a final function target and reconfirm from me. Bounty is confirmed, only the minimum features on which I would pay it, needs to be finalized.

        With regards.
        Sanjay.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • L
          ltning
          last edited by Aug 2, 2007, 2:55 PM

          @billm:

          @ltning:

          Hi,

          currently slbd only supports round-robin for server pools. The GUI currently advertises a failover mode. I need this to work as advertised, in addition to a way to see which system is currently active (in status page?) and - optionally - a quick way to toggle which system is used.

          FYI, that was a bug in implementation.  The server load balancing already has an implemented site down feature.

          I am aware of this. Will I be able to "chain" pools/virtual servers in order to achieve what I want? I.e. defining a single-server pool with the panichost pointing to another single-server pool, etc.? This would solve my problem, though it is a tad ugly…

          @billm:

          @ltning:

          After failing over to a lower-priority host, it should go back to the next higher-priority as soon as it is available again. The way it currently works with the "panic host" is the behavior I want, but I don't want to use that feature to achieve this – a "panic host" is still desired.

          Any takers?

          /Eirik

          For whoever considers this bounty…it'll require C skills and PHP skills to implement.

          ..except if my above idea works, in which case it would only have to be wrapped in some PHP …

          /Eirik

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L
            ltning
            last edited by Dec 27, 2007, 9:07 PM

            Hi,

            any updates here?
            I've been researching hoststated a bit, and while it's surely more powerful than slbd, it still lacks exactly what I need.

            /Eirik

            @ltning:

            @billm:

            @ltning:

            Hi,

            currently slbd only supports round-robin for server pools. The GUI currently advertises a failover mode. I need this to work as advertised, in addition to a way to see which system is currently active (in status page?) and - optionally - a quick way to toggle which system is used.

            FYI, that was a bug in implementation.  The server load balancing already has an implemented site down feature.

            I am aware of this. Will I be able to "chain" pools/virtual servers in order to achieve what I want? I.e. defining a single-server pool with the panichost pointing to another single-server pool, etc.? This would solve my problem, though it is a tad ugly…

            @billm:

            @ltning:

            After failing over to a lower-priority host, it should go back to the next higher-priority as soon as it is available again. The way it currently works with the "panic host" is the behavior I want, but I don't want to use that feature to achieve this – a "panic host" is still desired.

            Any takers?

            /Eirik

            For whoever considers this bounty…it'll require C skills and PHP skills to implement.

            ..except if my above idea works, in which case it would only have to be wrapped in some PHP …

            /Eirik

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
              This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
              consent.not_received