Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Transparent bridge will not pass packets

    Firewalling
    4
    4
    2.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      themelon
      last edited by

      Hello all,

      I have been trying to configure a transparent bridge firewall with no real luck.  I start with a fresh install of pfsense RC1 and configure exactly as described in the tutorial here:

      http://www.pfsense.com/mirror.php?section=tutorials/transparent_firewall/transparent_firewall.pdf

      but alas, I am unable to get anything to move across it.  I have not added or changed any of the default firewall rules.  As it is setup by default I should be able to go from LAN to WAN correct?  I have tried ping as well as http on a LAN system to a system on the WAN side.  I have even add a wide open rule for the WAN interface.  It made no difference.

      I can ping both test systems from the pfsense console, LAN and WAN IP addresses from the system on the LAN side and only the LAN IP address from the system on the WAN side.

      Any clue what is going on here?  I admit I am a newb to the *BSD world so I am at a slight disadvantage.  My background is Solaris and Linux.  What other kind of information can I give you that will aid in diagnosis?

      Thanks alot guys and a great job on the product.  It has all the features that m0n0wall lacked for what I need.

      LAN = 192.168.1.75
      WAN = 192.168.1.74

      $ ifconfig
      em0: flags=8943 <up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>mtu 1500
      options=8 <vlan_mtu>inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe80:cae2%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
      inet 192.168.1.75 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
      ether 00:30:48:80:ca:e2
      media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex>)
      status: active
      em1: flags=8943 <up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>mtu 1500
      options=8 <vlan_mtu>inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe80:cae3%em1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
      inet 192.168.1.74 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
      ether 00:30:48:80:ca:e3
      media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
      status: active
      pflog0: flags=100 <promisc>mtu 33208
      enc0: flags=0<> mtu 1536
      lo0: flags=8049 <up,loopback,running,multicast>mtu 16384
      inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
      inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
      inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
      pfsync0: flags=41 <up,running>mtu 2020
      pfsync: syncdev: lo0 maxupd: 128
      bridge0: flags=8043 <up,broadcast,running,multicast>mtu 1500
      ether ac🇩🇪48:24:fb:da
      priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20
      member: em1 flags=7 <learning,discover,stp>port 2 priority 128 path cost 55 forwarding
      member: em0 flags=7 <learning,discover,stp>port 1 priority 128 path cost 55 forwarding</learning,discover,stp></learning,discover,stp></up,broadcast,running,multicast></up,running></up,loopback,running,multicast></promisc></full-duplex></vlan_mtu></up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></vlan_mtu></up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Z
        ZPrime
        last edited by

        You don't have the two ports of the bridge plugged into the same switch or anything silly like that, right?  It would help to have a small diagram of how you have it setup, and what is trying to ping/access what…

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • L
          lsf
          last edited by

          Having the same subnet on lan and wan is generally not a good idea  ;)

          -lsf

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H
            hoba
            last edited by

            You usually don't have 2 ipadresses in a bridgescenario. You should only have 1 IP adress here. The Interface that is bridged to another one won't have an IP. Something here is borked. Also you are running RC1 which is way too old to be supported and numrous bugs have been fixed since that release. Update to RC2 and run the updatescripts to go to RC2e. Also rebuild your config from scratch.

            In fact I know that the bridge is working correctly as I have tested it inside out lately due to 2 bugreports which in the end showed up to be missconfigurations of some sort.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.