• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

LoadBalance-CP still not compatible?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Captive Portal
7 Posts 4 Posters 3.7k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ?
    Guest
    last edited by May 9, 2008, 3:42 AM May 5, 2008, 6:46 PM

    I've read some old posts that mention that Captive Portal is not compatible with loadbalance, is that still true?

    thanks
    Alfredo

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • H
      hoba
      last edited by May 5, 2008, 7:56 PM

      Afaik yes but I haven't tested it lately. If it still applies to the recent version it means that you can't use loadbalancing/policybased routing on the captive portal enabled interface (so clients at this interface will always use WAN), however you can use it at other interfaces on the same system. That part I know for sure as I use it this way at our office.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        Guest
        last edited by May 6, 2008, 3:40 AM

        My configuration is:

        –--Wan2------
        internet /    loadbalance \ ---PFSense-----LAN-(CP)--             
                      \      Failover    /
                        ----Wan1------

        So if I understand I can't set up CP on WAN1 or WAN2, but I can configure CP on LAN? then, will users at LAN use CP to get access to the internet?

        If not posssible, what could be a solution for this?

        Thanks

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          hoba
          last edited by May 6, 2008, 7:32 PM

          If it's the lan subnet that should be behind the captive portal loadbalancing won't make too much sense in this setup (unless it's working together in the newer versions). Why don't you simply test it and let us know?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            Guest
            last edited by May 6, 2008, 11:25 PM

            OK,

            I'll setup the loadbalance an check

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              siwireless
              last edited by May 19, 2008, 9:22 PM

              Simple fix until the new version comes out since 1.3 is spossed to have it but for now set it up like below.

              SERVER 1
              INTERNET 1 & 2 -> PFSENSE -> DHCP ENABLED
              THEN RUN THE LAN CABLE TO SERVER 2 IN WAN PORT
              SERVER 2
              INTERNET SERVER 1 TO SERVER 2 -> DHCP ENABLED -> CAPTIVE PORTAL

              THIS WORKS I HAVE TRIED IT.

              P.S. USE ON DHCH 10.X.X.X THIS WORKS BEST OTHER WISE YOU WONT BE ABLE TO ACCESS SOME WEBSITE OK.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                radeck
                last edited by Jul 3, 2008, 2:01 AM

                @afrugone:

                My configuration is:

                –--Wan2------
                internet /    loadbalance \ ---PFSense-----LAN-(CP)--             
                              \      Failover    /
                                ----Wan1------

                So if I understand I can't set up CP on WAN1 or WAN2, but I can configure CP on LAN? then, will users at LAN use CP to get access to the internet?

                If not posssible, what could be a solution for this?

                Thanks

                i have configuration like this :
                                    WAN1
                            /–---------------
                Internet- PFsense(LB+FO) --PFsense(CP)--LAN
                          ------------------/
                                    WAN2
                And i set up CP on LAN & WAN and it's work OK. when i set up CP on LAN, user still can browse the web. but when it's set up on LAN & WAN the user must enter username & password first then they can browse the net....  ;D ;D ;D

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                  This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                  consent.not_received