Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Interface for Reverse Proxy {now $500}

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Expired/Withdrawn Bounties
    14 Posts 8 Posters 14.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H
      hoba
      last edited by

      Ok, it's sit and wait then  ;)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        joanywhere
        last edited by

        Hoba,
        I had to chuckle about this.  If I'm adhering to forum rules, then what was the point of your original response?  I assume that as an administrator you know the rules to the various forums? :) :) :)

        I'm curious to see what it would take someone to build this, and then work towards raising the funds

        regards
        Jo

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          hoba
          last edited by

          No offense, just ignore me  ;)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            joanywhere
            last edited by

            Hehe.. not that anyone DOES seem interested.

            I would have thought this was a fairly straightforward mod for someone with the right skills?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              Guest
              last edited by

              Typically someone with the right skills is able to charge a premium for those skills.  Also, those people tend to have their time pretty heavily in demand.  You'll notice that the spamd project has a bounty of $1000 just to fix the existing package.  In terms of complexity, the spamd package is probably similar to creating a Varnish package, so its not a simply, easy-to-implement job like you might believe.  Although many of us believe that Varnish is a superior piece of software, I doubt you'll find many people interested in doing the work without a set dollar amount and a very complete and detailed specification for what the project would look like.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                joanywhere
                last edited by

                Sumicron,
                all good comments with one exception - I never assumed that this was easy.

                I'll consider placing a $$ value on this bounty and see what happens

                Cheers
                Jo

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jwbrown77
                  last edited by

                  Want a killer feature that no one but f5 and Secure Computing (that I can find) are offering?

                  Do a reverse proxy with Apache and integrate it with mod_security.  This allows for intrusion detection on HTTPS, which Snort can't do.

                  This is a requirement  for PCI (Credit Card Industry Regulations) that many people would be interested in.

                  I'd offer a bounty but I don't have the time to wait on it since the deadline is 6/30.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    sullrich
                    last edited by

                    Varnish would be a better solution IMHO.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      cybrsrfr
                      last edited by

                      Another option for reverse proxy is Nginx. It is a very fast web server running many large Russian websites. It can also be a proxy server.  Below are some of my notes I have been collecting about Nginx. License is a BSD style license.

                      HTTP Server and Reverse Proxy
                      http://nginx.net/

                      Documentation
                      http://wiki.codemongers.com/Main

                      Reverse Proxy Example Config (can be used for load balancing, add https to web sites)
                      http://brainspl.at/nginx.conf.txt

                      Forum
                      http://nginxforums.com/

                      http://hostingfu.com/article/nginx-vs-lighttpd-for-a-small-vps
                      http://blog.fastmail.fm/2007/01/04/webimappop-frontend-proxies-changed-to-nginx/
                      http://errtheblog.com/posts/52-nginx-config-like-whoa
                      http://brainspl.at/articles/2006/08/23/nginx-my-new-favorite-front-end-for-mongrel-cluster

                      I'm not sure which is better Varnish or Nginx just wanted to share another BSD licensed tool that could provide this functionality.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A
                        andersenvance
                        last edited by

                        I would be willing to kick in $500 for Apache mod_proxy, mod_rewrite, plus mod_security to use as a Web Application Firewall (WAF).  It would need the ability to terminate the SSL/HTTPS on the firewall so that http traffic could be process by mod_security.  I think there is a great SSL proxy app called "Pound" available that does SSL Proxy.

                        Let me know if this is doable.

                        Thanks!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          kosta
                          last edited by

                          Sorry for the possible stupid question, but im assuming anyone can grab up a bounty? If thats the case, I may be interested in this project =]

                          I am currently working with pfsense in a test environment to try to replace our current setup at work.

                          Now as far as questions about the bounty, I'm assuming you would want this proxy to work with different back-end servers. i.e. :

                          192.168.1.10 www.site1.com
                          192.168.1.11 www.site2.com
                          192.168.1.12 www.site3.com

                          Use pfsense as central WAF (web appliance firewall) that would check content, and if ok pass on to appropriate site. Im assuming this would be configured through pfsense, i.e. point site1 to .10 ip, site2 .11 and site3 .12.

                          Let me know if that makes sense!

                          thanks,

                          kosta

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.