Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Traffic shaper changes [90% completed, please send money to complete bounty]

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Completed Bounties
    375 Posts 72 Posters 491.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      eri--
      last edited by

      Can you try a snapshot of 2.0 and use the limiter?
      Actually it is dummynet just used with pf.
      You might want just a simple layer of dummynet, 2 limiters(pipe) or queues(childs) in dummynet with appropriate src/dst mask which will share the bandiwdth according to online users and you can use ALTQ to prioritize types of traffic like HTTP ACKs better than normal HTTP traffic etc….

      We are getting there on protocols shaping(l7 detection) but not finished.

      If it is satisfies you in 2.0 i can merge it back on the 1.2.1 build, based on your contribution, i will make available after the 1.2.1 release of pfSense.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        matremblay
        last edited by

        I did not notice it was possible to download a 2.0. I will try to install it, since its not a full release I must first check to see if the network is functional with it for a little while, I really can't afford alot of downtime. I will take a look at it and if it seems to help then I can contribute to get help configuring it properly since I'm not that much of an expert

        But just to be sure, you are confident the type of network I have can be handled by this? If so this piece of software is worth alot of money to us and will be rewarded accordingly.. I mean they sell machines that do this for like 3k. This is sort of ip-based traffic shaping right?

        I'll post back after I upgrade to 2.0 snapshot

        thank you for your reply so quickly

        Marc

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          matremblay
          last edited by

          Sorry, my first post might have seemed out of context, I now read the entire thread, realized it spanned over a year and understood that you are pretty much done with this and it's included in pfsense2. however, pfsense2 is described as not recommended, I really REALLY want to try it but my 250 users might not like it if it fails, is it stable enough? or am i gonna have to go over there at 2 am next sunday because it crashes?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • E
            eri--
            last edited by

            If you want to use it just for shaping and basic firewalling it should be safe to try.

            Can you post your requirments so i can give you a suggestion on how-to?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              matremblay
              last edited by

              Like I said in my first post, it is a very simple network. I am not good with diagrams but I will try my best

              Internet          –-> Fiber-to-Ethernet Box ----> pfsense server --------> multiple unmanaged 10/100 switches -----> 250 end users
              Point-to-point            10mbit/10mbit                P4 computer                    some with gigabit uplinks                      wireless APs will most       
              Fixed Ip                                                        eth0 wan                      most of the network is wired                    likely be added next
              to Telco                                                        eth1 lan                          (80%) for 10mbit, rest is 5e                    summer

              About the server:

              Right now it is doing everything

              DHCP, DNS, NAT, Firewall, Traffic Shaper
              Should these functions be divided in two computers to have the stable release sharing the internet, and another one shaping the traffic so that there is added redundancy or it is sufficient?

              Server is 10.0.10.1 subnet is 10.0.10.xxx to 10.0.11.254

              Objective is to offer fast reliable service for basic internet features for students : web, mail, IM, games, web phones/cams. and restrict p2p and other traffic that is clogging the network to a crawl

              Recently the wiring was redone, so each floor (1 to 5) has a feeder coming from the first switch to its switch room, then two additionnal switches are connected to each other per floor.

              I'm trying to include as much information but I think thats pretty much it

              On a side note, the last pfsense I installed was from the "live cd" release. I noticed the 2.0 snapshots only say "alpha alpha". Is the install procedure still similar? Just to know what to expect.

              Thank you in advance. Again if this is successful I'd be more than willing to pay you for your trouble and research if you supply me with a "custom" build and some support for setting it up (which is pretty much what you are doing now)

              Thank you so much for everything so far!! I feel, and hope this might be the solution of many of my troubles of the past few months

              Marc

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                matremblay
                last edited by

                Tomorrow morning I will go and install 2.0 over there

                if you can post a few tips about the installation and configuration of the new features

                i.e "limiter", and "http ack queue"

                thanks ermal

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  matremblay
                  last edited by

                  i installed 2.0 snapshot today, seems to be working well. However I would like help to configure the shaper and limiter for my needs if you dont mind

                  thanks in advance

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    sporkme
                    last edited by

                    Howdy,

                    It's been some time since I've played with pfsense, but right now I've got a hard drive with the "click of death" so I have to reinstall.  For now, I'm trying 1.2.1-RC2, but since I'm now somewhere with a 30/5 and a 6.0/768 connection, I'd really like to try the new filter.  I have not received any updates from Ermal regarding new builds for quite some time.  Is there anything new forthcoming?  Would a basic config from 1.2.1-RC2 work with the older snapshot?

                    Thanks

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      eri--
                      last edited by

                      @sporkme
                      it is coming as i always said after 1.2.1 is released.

                      @matermblay
                      Run a traffic shaper wizard with pfSense for your needs that will take care of the prioritizing of ACK and protocols.
                      You may look at the rules generated to see if it actually what you expected.
                      For the limiter you need to decide if you want to divide equally the traffic to each user or youwant to assign more weight to http traffic and than less weight to other traffic.
                      Give me more details about what policy you need and i will recommend what changes you need to do to filter rules generated by the wizard to integrate the limiter in there.

                      As i said per protocol shaping/filtering is coming real soon but you can start with this one.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        matremblay
                        last edited by

                        @ermal

                        thank you for your reply, I ran the shaping wizard but it stopped all traffic, then I saw another post that said it was looking at the "queue status" page that did this, so i will try running it again without looking at the queues monday, which wizard do you suggest i run based on my setup?

                        also in previous posts you told me i could increase http performance by making a http ack queue, could you teach me how please?

                        As for the limiter i tried setting the pipes but it did not do anything i must be doing it wrong. I would like to prioritize http but if it doesnt work i will split bandwidth to everyone equally.. something alongthe lines of 800kbitdownload/400kbit upload for all

                        thank you for your help

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          eri--
                          last edited by

                          The ACK queue is created by the wizard and you can take a look at the rules generated the use that queue.
                          It will become clear when you see it configured.

                          For the limiter yes you created it but you have to apply it in the rules on the 'In/Out' section.
                          Depending on the needs.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            matremblay
                            last edited by

                            sorry i dont know if i am stupid or something but i really dont get the limiter. where is this in/out section?

                            I added the queues, checked the "enable" box, saved, and clicked apply settings
                            nothing, i can still download at 1000KB

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • E
                              eri--
                              last edited by

                              In the rules! Firewall->Rules

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • K
                                kapara
                                last edited by

                                @ermal

                                Never got the PM about the traffic shaper to try out.  ???

                                Thanks

                                Skype ID:  Marinhd

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C
                                  cmb
                                  last edited by

                                  This bounty is completed, for support, head to the 2.0 board.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.