• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

[SOLVED] CP not working (1.2.3) - passes ALL traffic without auth

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Captive Portal
13 Posts 5 Posters 7.4k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L
    luken
    last edited by Jan 12, 2010, 11:44 AM Dec 22, 2009, 11:00 AM

    Hello,

    I have a clean install pfSense 1.2.3-RELEASE (from liveCD).

    CP enabled on LAN (fxp1) iface with local user manager and a list allowed IP (3 x AP not in list)

    
    $ ipfw list
    00030 skipto 50000 ip from any to any in via fxp0 keep-state
    00500 allow pfsync from any to any
    00500 allow carp from any to any
    00500 allow ip from 10.22.21.1 to any out via fxp1
    00501 allow ip from any to 10.22.21.1 in via fxp1
    01000 skipto 50000 ip from any to any not layer2 not via fxp1
    01001 allow ip from any to any layer2 not via fxp1
    01100 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x0806
    01100 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x888e
    01100 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x88c7
    01100 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x8863
    01100 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x8864
    01100 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x8863
    01100 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x8864
    01100 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x888e
    01101 deny ip from any to any layer2 not mac-type 0x0800
    01102 skipto 20000 ip from any to any layer2
    01200 allow udp from any 68 to 255.255.255.255 dst-port 67 in
    01201 allow udp from any 68 to 10.22.21.1 dst-port 67 in
    01202 allow udp from 10.22.21.1 67 to any dst-port 68 out
    01203 allow icmp from 10.22.21.1 to any out icmptypes 8
    01204 allow icmp from any to 10.22.21.1 in icmptypes 0
    01300 allow udp from any to 10.22.21.1 dst-port 53 in
    01300 allow udp from any to 10.22.21.1 dst-port 53 in
    01301 allow udp from 10.22.21.1 53 to any out
    01301 allow udp from 10.22.21.1 53 to any out
    01302 allow tcp from any to 10.22.21.1 dst-port 8000 in
    01302 allow tcp from any to 10.22.21.1 dst-port 8000 in
    01303 allow tcp from 10.22.21.1 8000 to any out
    01303 allow tcp from 10.22.21.1 8000 to any out
    10000 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.11 to any in
    10000 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.11 out
    10001 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.12 to any in
    10001 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.12 out
    10002 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.13 to any in
    10002 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.13 out
    10003 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.14 to any in
    10003 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.14 out
    10004 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.15 to any in
    10004 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.15 out
    10005 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.16 to any in
    10005 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.16 out
    10006 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.17 to any in
    10006 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.17 out
    10007 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.18 to any in
    10007 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.18 out
    10008 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.19 to any in
    10008 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.19 out
    10009 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.2 to any in
    10009 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.2 out
    10010 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.20 to any in
    10010 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.20 out
    10011 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.21 to any in
    10011 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.21 out
    10012 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.22 to any in
    10012 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.22 out
    10013 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.23 to any in
    10013 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.23 out
    10014 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.24 to any in
    10014 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.24 out
    10015 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.25 to any in
    10015 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.25 out
    10016 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.26 to any in
    10016 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.26 out
    10017 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.27 to any in
    10017 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.27 out
    10018 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.28 to any in
    10018 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.28 out
    10019 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.29 to any in
    10019 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.29 out
    10020 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.30 to any in
    10020 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.30 out
    10021 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.31 to any in
    10021 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.31 out
    10022 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.32 to any in
    10022 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.32 out
    10023 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.33 to any in
    10023 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.33 out
    10024 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.34 to any in
    10024 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.34 out
    10025 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.35 to any in
    10025 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.35 out
    10026 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.36 to any in
    10026 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.36 out
    10027 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.37 to any in
    10027 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.37 out
    10028 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.38 to any in
    10028 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.38 out
    10029 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.39 to any in
    10029 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.39 out
    10030 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.40 to any in
    10030 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.40 out
    10031 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.41 to any in
    10031 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.41 out
    10032 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.42 to any in
    10032 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.42 out
    10033 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.43 to any in
    10033 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.43 out
    10034 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.44 to any in
    10034 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.44 out
    10035 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.45 to any in
    10035 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.45 out
    10036 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.46 to any in
    10036 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.46 out
    10037 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.47 to any in
    10037 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.47 out
    10038 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.48 to any in
    10038 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.48 out
    10039 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.49 to any in
    10039 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.49 out
    10040 skipto 50000 ip from 10.22.21.50 to any in
    10040 skipto 50000 ip from any to 10.22.21.50 out
    10041 skipto 50000 ip from 212.191.64.10 to any in
    10041 skipto 50000 ip from any to 212.191.64.10 out
    10042 skipto 50000 ip from any to 212.191.64.10 in
    10042 skipto 50000 ip from 212.191.64.10 to any out
    10043 pipe 50543 ip from 10.22.21.7 to any in
    10043 pipe 55543 ip from any to 10.22.21.7 out
    19902 fwd 127.0.0.1,8000 tcp from any to any dst-port 80 in
    19903 allow tcp from any 80 to any out
    19904 deny ip from any to any
    29900 allow ip from any to any layer2
    65535 allow ip from any to any
    

    and.. there is NO login page. Users from AP (10.22.21.3 ,6 ,7) can access internet unrestricted.

    I belive this is not the way how CP should work..

    I would be grateful for any help you could give me.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • G
      GruensFroeschli
      last edited by Dec 22, 2009, 12:01 PM

      Did you make sure that your APs don't NAT?
      If you allow traffic from the IPs/MACs of the APs and your APs do NAT, then all traffic from your clients will appear as if from the AP.

      We do what we must, because we can.

      Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • L
        luken
        last edited by Dec 22, 2009, 12:29 PM

        Thanks for the reply.

        APs do NAT.

        192.168.1.0/24 <-> AP1 (10.22.21.3) <-> Gateway (10.22.21.1)

        ..but 10.22.21.3 is NOT on allowed list, so users should be redirected to CP.

        Please correct me, if I'm wrong..

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G
          Gertjan
          last edited by Dec 22, 2009, 4:34 PM

          Hummm.

          My C.P. IP (on Opt1) is 192.168.2.1
          I have 5 Ap's : 192.168.2.2 - 3 -4 - 5 - 6
          The DHCP server running on the C.P. is throwing out IP's on requests from 192.168.2.10 up untill 192.168.2.200
          My AP do not NAT neither.
          It works a published.

          YOU :
          @luken:

          192.168.1.0/24 <-> AP1 (10.22.21.3) <-> Gateway (10.22.21.1)

          192.168.1.0/24 is the IP set given to your clients ??
          Your clienst should have an IP that runs from 10.22.21.10 (or more) up untill 10.22.21.254 - the 192.168.1.0 seems wrong to me here.
          Who converts from 192.168.1.0/24 to 10.22.21.1 (btw : this is called NATting  :D)

          No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
          Edit : and where are the logs ??

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L
            luken
            last edited by Dec 23, 2009, 8:30 AM Dec 23, 2009, 8:21 AM

            @Gertjan:

            192.168.1.0/24 is the IP set given to your clients ??
            Your clienst should have an IP that runs from 10.22.21.10 (or more) up untill 10.22.21.254 - the 192.168.1.0 seems wrong to me here.
            Who converts from 192.168.1.0/24 to 10.22.21.1 (btw : this is called NATting  :D)

            Yes. Once again:

            
            wifi-client1 (192.168.1.53 via DHCP )---<>
                                                                       (192.168.1.1) AP1 (NAT) (10.22.21.3 static)  <> (10.22.21.1) Gateway
            wifi-client2 (192.168.1.78 via DHCP )---<>
            
            

            Wi-fi clients network shouldn't be a problem when they are translating on AP.. (Am I wrong?)

            Today I checked again. Strange, but sometimes wifi client is redirected to login page, sometimes - not.  ???
            Please, help me diagnose this.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G
              GruensFroeschli
              last edited by Dec 23, 2009, 8:40 AM

              The CP will show up for the first client to authenticate.
              After that the MAC/IP of the AP is authenticated and all further clients can just go online.

              Wi-fi clients network shouldn't be a problem when they are translating on AP.. (Am I wrong?)

              Yes you are wrong.
              NAT breaks the CP functionality.
              (This is not a pfSense limitation. This is just how CPs work)

              We do what we must, because we can.

              Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • L
                luken
                last edited by Dec 23, 2009, 10:32 AM Dec 23, 2009, 10:20 AM

                Many thanks GruensFroeschli! :) I undarstand now.

                What should I do to auth client connecting from APs (WRT320N) on pfSense?

                Thanks again.

                EDIT:
                PS: Since this is not CP-related problem I'm not sure is this a right place for my topic. Anyway modarators decide :)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • 0
                  0tt0
                  last edited by Dec 29, 2009, 4:03 PM Dec 29, 2009, 3:54 PM

                  @luken:

                  Many thanks GruensFroeschli! :) I undarstand now.

                  What should I do to auth client connecting from APs (WRT320N) on pfSense?

                  Thanks again.

                  EDIT:
                  PS: Since this is not CP-related problem I'm not sure is this a right place for my topic. Anyway modarators decide :)

                  You should use an access point and not a NAT-router which you are using now, yours just happen to have an built-in access point. If your router can be set to AP mode (some can) use that (will bridge clients onto local net) otherwise buy a real access point and add that to your network. Now your built-in access point in the router is bridging clients onto the local net behind the router itself.

                  Apart from this issue with router/ap, you may also have the same problem that I have with CP, providing that you're not mistaken in your info regarding allowed list. Indeed you should see logon page at least once.

                  Some of my posts regarding my problems with CP: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,20206.0.html

                  Cheers,

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    capnsteve
                    last edited by Jan 5, 2010, 2:36 PM

                    You can do this just fine with a WRT320N, I'm using one on my home pfSense server.  Just disable the DHCP server on the Router and set it up with a static IP outside pfSense's DHCP range.  Works without issue for me.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      GruensFroeschli
                      last edited by Jan 5, 2010, 2:40 PM

                      @capnsteve:

                      You can do this just fine with a WRT320N, I'm using one on my home pfSense server.  Just disable the DHCP server on the Router and set it up with a static IP outside pfSense's DHCP range.  Works without issue for me.

                      In your case you must be routing and not NATing.
                      If you NAT it wouldn't work.

                      We do what we must, because we can.

                      Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        capnsteve
                        last edited by Jan 5, 2010, 11:02 PM

                        @GruensFroeschli:

                        @capnsteve:

                        You can do this just fine with a WRT320N, I'm using one on my home pfSense server.  Just disable the DHCP server on the Router and set it up with a static IP outside pfSense's DHCP range.  Works without issue for me.

                        In your case you must be routing and not NATing.
                        If you NAT it wouldn't work.

                        I was providing specific-case instructions from my own experience.  In the standard issue Linksys firmware you just disable the DHCP server and set it to do DHCP forwarding pointed at the pfSense box.  That will also disable the NAT leaving the routing functions.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 0
                          0tt0
                          last edited by Jan 8, 2010, 2:07 PM

                          @capnsteve:

                          @GruensFroeschli:

                          @capnsteve:

                          You can do this just fine with a WRT320N, I'm using one on my home pfSense server.  Just disable the DHCP server on the Router and set it up with a static IP outside pfSense's DHCP range.  Works without issue for me.

                          In your case you must be routing and not NATing.
                          If you NAT it wouldn't work.

                          I was providing specific-case instructions from my own experience.  In the standard issue Linksys firmware you just disable the DHCP server and set it to do DHCP forwarding pointed at the pfSense box.  That will also disable the NAT leaving the routing functions.

                          In your specific case that may be correct but generally no. Many SOHO routers have the ability to shut down DHCP service but that don't have to imply that NAT is also turned off, it's a separate setting, if available.

                          Neither is the same workings as a standard bridging AP though. Bridging is not the same as routing and in general terms they are very different, the former is data link and the latter is network.

                          Cheers,

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • L
                            luken
                            last edited by Jan 12, 2010, 11:44 AM

                            Thanks.

                            I've just disabled DHCP server on wrt320n (and also wrt610n) and changed plug with inet source from WAN to LAN.
                            IP list based pass through -> mac list (for wired network)

                            CP works like a charm. :)

                            SOLVED.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            13 out of 13
                            • First post
                              13/13
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                              This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                              consent.not_received