Help with multi-wan traffic shapping. [$20]
-
Looking for some help in the form of step by step instruction via AIM/email/phone. I'm going to be using a Dell PowerEdge 750 with 1 GB of RAM, and I'm thinking it should be plenty. I know I could figure out what is possible and how to do it, but honestly I have other projects I would like to get to. So here is what I'm looking to do. As far as traffic shaping goes I have listed the items in order of importance. For the most part if there is traffic to be had on say WarCraft port, I could care less about any other items below it, it could time out for all I care so no need to reserve ANY bandwidth for items below the one above it (with the acceptation of maybe ventrillo, that could get 5-10% if it needs it). Here is what I'm looking to do:
WAN1 (default)(dynDNS)(failover if WAN2 drops)
Download (1,024 kbps)
WarCraft (3724)
ventrilo (changes based on server i can edit port number later)
https
other
various (chat 5190 + others hoping i can add them to the rule as i go)
SageTV guide data (7760)Upload (cap 384 kbps)
WarCraft
ventrilo
https
Web Server
other
various chatWAN2 (failover if WAN1 drops)
Download (no cap but ~12,000kbps)
httpUpload (4,000 kbps)
SageTV Server
FTPWAN3
Download (~20,000 kbps)- for custom IP on the LAN
WarCraft Downloader (6112)
Windows Updates (443?)
Upload (~10,000 kbps)
OTHER Issues
WAN3 part isn't that important I just saw the open network with good speed and figured i would use it for the big annoying stuff.I want to use DNS from WAN1 unless that dies then I want to use DNS from WAN2. WAN2 is a static IP so I think I'll need to type in DNS server for that (it's behind a router so I think I want it to point to the router).
I would also like to get some url filtering for advertisements going on.
My head is bobbing and hitting about to hit the keyboard as I write this. Sorry if anything is incoherent. Let me know if interested in lending me a hand via AIM / email / phone.
- for custom IP on the LAN
-
Multiwan traffic shaping is not possible on 1.2.3.
-
2.0?
If not I'll have to review the rules just a bit, and upgrade connection speed.
-
For 2.0 it is very possible.