Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    The digital signature on this image is invalid

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 1.2.3-PRERELEASE-TESTING snapshots - RETIRED
    5 Posts 3 Posters 5.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J Offline
      justsomeguy6575
      last edited by

      "The digital signature on this image is invalid.
      This means that the image you uploaded is not an official/supported image and may lead to unexpected behavior or security compromises. Only install images that come from sources that you trust, and make sure that the image has not been tampered with.

      Do you want to install this image anyway (on your own risk)?"

      This is the message I get when I attempt to update to the pfSense-Full-Update-1.2.3-20090928-1703.tgz.
      I have downloaded the file twice and get the same problem.  The is where I downloaded it from http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD_RELENG_7_2/pfSense_RELENG_1_2/updates/

      is it safe to use this or should I wait?

      Thanks
      Matt

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P Offline
        pakjebakmeel
        last edited by

        What I understand is that snapshots do not contain a digital signature. Only official releases are signed, you will always get this message when invoking snapshot firmware's. Obviously there is always a risk when installing snapshots, when the device is business critical you could consider waiting for the official release.

        With a bit of basic searching you would have found this:

        http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,19095.0.html  ;)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ Offline
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          Yes, only official releases and release candidates are signed.

          An official signed RC3 image is being tested right now and could be released at any time.

          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J Offline
            justsomeguy6575
            last edited by

            I'm sorry, to be honest I didn't do a search…. I just looked at the subject of the first page of posts.  I do normally try and do a search, not sure why I didn't this time.  Anyhow I just found it strange because I have updated to several 1.2.3 releases in the past and never seen that message before.

            I've been using pfsense for a while now.  One at a small office and one at home.  Absolutely love it.  I've tried many different firewall solutions like ipcop, smoothwall, monowall, and clarkconnect(seemed convenient at first but too many security problems with running a server on the same box).  This is the all around best out there.  So just want to says thanks to all the developers.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P Offline
              pakjebakmeel
              last edited by

              @justsomeguy6575:

              I'm sorry, to be honest I didn't do a search…. I just looked at the subject of the first page of posts.  I do normally try and do a search, not sure why I didn't this time.  Anyhow I just found it strange because I have updated to several 1.2.3 releases in the past and never seen that message before.

              I've been using pfsense for a while now.  One at a small office and one at home.  Absolutely love it.  I've tried many different firewall solutions like ipcop, smoothwall, monowall, and clarkconnect(seemed convenient at first but too many security problems with running a server on the same box).  This is the all around best out there.  So just want to says thanks to all the developers.

              See the thread I mentioned. Gloomrider posts:

              Signature check is new, correct?  This is the first time I've seen this.

              Then CMB posts:

              New on nanobsd, yeah. It was broken for nanobsd previously.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.