Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Please add compression support for ipsec $200

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Expired/Withdrawn Bounties
    17 Posts 2 Posters 11.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E Offline
      Eugene
      last edited by

      @mxx:

      Tried with shrewsoft?

      Yes, it is successfully negotiate with both ipcomp turned on and off but only if pfSense acts as a server for Mobile Client. I did not manage to make shresoft client to work with pfSense in site-to-site tunnel mode.

      http://ru.doc.pfsense.org

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        mxx
        last edited by

        Hi,

        this is great news. If you've gotten this far, I'm sure you'll succeed with the remaining site-to-site mode as well ;)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E Offline
          Eugene
          last edited by

          @mxx:

          Hi,

          this is great news. If you've gotten this far, I'm sure you'll succeed with the remaining site-to-site mode as well ;)

          Hi,
          I am afraid it's not about me, it is about shrewsoft client - it just does not want to negotiate in site-to-site mode and to be honest I do not see how it is expected to work using threwsoft client. You install it on your PC and vpn into the office, that works.
          As far as I understand you use other software/equipment, why don't we return to your set up?

          http://ru.doc.pfsense.org

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            mxx
            last edited by

            Hi,

            thanks for your reply.
            I'm using several Lancom 1811 VPN gateways to build site-to-site tunnels with a central pfsense box.
            This of course is a setup you can't test as long as you don't have such a device.

            Is there no way to verify if a tunnel between 2 pfsense boxes is actually effectively using ipcomp?
            If that works, it will work with the Lancoms too..

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              mxx
              last edited by

              Or do you have any other hardware vpn gateway which you could use for testing?
              When I setup ipcomp (using deflate) on the Lancoms, they won't connect if the other side isn't using it.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • E Offline
                Eugene
                last edited by

                @mxx:

                Is there no way to verify if a tunnel between 2 pfsense boxes is actually effectively using ipcomp?
                If that works, it will work with the Lancoms too..

                I have configuration that allows two pfSense boxes to set up tunnel with ipcomp in SPDs but I do not know a method to prove that ipcomp is actually 'in use' when passing traffic as I do not see any compression.

                http://ru.doc.pfsense.org

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E Offline
                  Eugene
                  last edited by

                  @mxx:

                  Or do you have any other hardware vpn gateway which you could use for testing?
                  When I setup ipcomp (using deflate) on the Lancoms, they won't connect if the other side isn't using it.

                  We can try to configure pfSense in the way I did and if it works with Lancoms then we can think about adding this feature to GUI.

                  http://ru.doc.pfsense.org

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    mxx
                    last edited by

                    Okay, good idea.
                    How would we do this?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E Offline
                      Eugene
                      last edited by

                      @mxx:

                      Okay, good idea.
                      How would we do this?

                      Now I am busy at work but I'll pm you later and we'll agree on when and how.

                      http://ru.doc.pfsense.org

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M Offline
                        mxx
                        last edited by

                        Ok, being busy too, won't be able to do the test until tomorrow

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.