Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    CP not work correctly

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Captive Portal
    4 Posts 2 Posters 2.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • savagoS
      savago
      last edited by

      After update to last  from 26.04 v2 CP not work correctly

      
      # ipfw pipe list
      20002:   2.050 Kbit/s    0 ms burst 0 
      q151074 100 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 85538 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail
       sched 85538 type FIFO flags 0x0 0 buckets 1 active
        0 ip           0.0.0.0/0             0.0.0.0/0       30     5170 15 2136   0
      20003:   5.120 Kbit/s    0 ms burst 0 
      q151075 100 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 85539 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail
       sched 85539 type FIFO flags 0x0 0 buckets 1 active
        0 ip           0.0.0.0/0             0.0.0.0/0        3     3126  1   98   0
      # ipfw pipe list
      20002:   2.050 Kbit/s    0 ms burst 0 
      q151074 100 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 85538 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail
       sched 85538 type FIFO flags 0x0 0 buckets 1 active
        0 ip           0.0.0.0/0             0.0.0.0/0       33     5432 12 1878   0
      20003:   5.120 Kbit/s    0 ms burst 0 
      q151075 100 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 85539 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail
       sched 85539 type FIFO flags 0x0 0 buckets 1 active
        0 ip           0.0.0.0/0             0.0.0.0/0        8     3568  4  344   0
      # ipfw table 1 list
      192.168.10.253/32 mac 00:15:c5:20:27:78 20002
      # ipfw table 2 list
      192.168.10.253/32 mac 00:15:c5:20:27:78 20003
      
      

      Sys 2.0-RC1: Intel Atom N330 Dual Core @1.6 2048M Ram 40GHD

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        Nothing changed on the builder or in the code between the 26th to today that would have affected CP. Are you sure nothing else changed?

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • savagoS
          savago
          last edited by

          @jimp:

          Nothing changed on the builder or in the code between the 26th to today that would have affected CP. Are you sure nothing else changed?

          I update from  release 4.4.2011.There no problem at all.We use external radius.

          
          uname -a
          FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 #1: Mon Apr  4 06:03:23 EDT 2011     sullrich@FreeBSD_8.0_pfSense_2.0-snaps.pfsense.org:/usr/obj.pfSense/usr/pfSensesrc/src/sys/pfSense_SMP.8  i386
          
          20012:   2.048 Mbit/s    0 ms burst 0 
          q151084 100 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 85548 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail
           sched 85548 type FIFO flags 0x0 0 buckets 1 active
            0 ip           0.0.0.0/0             0.0.0.0/0       11      726  0    0   0
          20013:   5.120 Mbit/s    0 ms burst 0 
          q151085 100 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 85549 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail
           sched 85549 type FIFO flags 0x0 0 buckets 1 active
            0 ip           0.0.0.0/0             0.0.0.0/0        2     1652  0    0   0
          
          Login OK: [user/1111] (from client pfsense port 12 cli 00:15:f2:a7:45:4d) 
          +- entering group post-auth {...}
          Exec-Program output: WISPr-Bandwidth-Max-Up=2048,WISPr-Bandwidth-Max-Down=5120,
          Exec-Program-Wait: value-pairs: WISPr-Bandwidth-Max-Up=2048,WISPr-Bandwidth-Max-Down=5120
          Exec-Program: returned: 0
          ++[exec] returns noop
          Sending Access-Accept of id 21 to 192.168.0.254 port 57887
          	WISPr-Bandwidth-Max-Up = 2048
          	WISPr-Bandwidth-Max-Down = 5120
          Finished request 9.
          Going to the next request
          
          

          This is release with problem with radius bandw. parameters
          (pipe show  is different from release 4.4.2011):

          
          name -a
          FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p3 #1: Mon Apr 25 20:44:39 EDT 2011     sullrich@FreeBSD_8.0_pfSense_2.0-snaps.pfsense.org:/usr/obj.pfSense/usr/pfSensesrc/src/sys/pfSense.8  i386
          
          [2.0-RC1][root@xxxyyy.homeunix.org]/var/log(15): ipfw show
          65291    0      0 allow pfsync from any to any
          65292    0      0 allow carp from any to any
          65301    8    296 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x0806
          65302    0      0 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x888e
          65303    0      0 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x88c7
          65304    0      0 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x8863
          65305    0      0 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x8864
          65306    0      0 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x888e
          65307    0      0 deny ip from any to any layer2 not mac-type 0x0800
          65310  349  29338 allow ip from any to { 255.255.255.255 or 192.168.0.254 } in
          65311  764 147306 allow ip from { 255.255.255.255 or 192.168.0.254 } to any out
          65312    0      0 allow icmp from { 255.255.255.255 or 192.168.0.254 } to any out icmptypes 0
          65313    0      0 allow icmp from any to { 255.255.255.255 or 192.168.0.254 } in icmptypes 8
          65314    0      0 allow ip from table(3) to any in
          65315    0      0 allow ip from any to table(4) out
          65316    0      0 pipe tablearg ip from table(5) to any in
          65317    0      0 pipe tablearg ip from any to table(6) out
          65318    0      0 allow ip from any to table(7) in
          65319    0      0 allow ip from table(8) to any out
          65320    0      0 pipe tablearg ip from any to table(9) in
          65321    0      0 pipe tablearg ip from table(10) to any out
          65322 2418 144231 pipe tablearg ip from table(1) to any in
          65323  897  70184 pipe tablearg ip from any to table(2) out
          65531  815  83726 fwd 127.0.0.1,8000 tcp from any to any in
          65532  727  65756 allow tcp from any to any out
          65533    6    614 deny ip from any to any
          65534    0      0 allow ip from any to any layer2
          65535  312  31665 allow ip from any to any
          
          Login OK: [user/1111] (from client pfsense port 10 cli 00:15:f2:a7:45:4d) 
          +- entering group post-auth {...}
          Exec-Program output: WISPr-Bandwidth-Max-Up=2048,WISPr-Bandwidth-Max-Down=5120,
          Exec-Program-Wait: value-pairs: WISPr-Bandwidth-Max-Up=2048,WISPr-Bandwidth-Max-Down=5120
          Exec-Program: returned: 0
          ++[exec] returns noop
          Sending Access-Accept of id 246 to 192.168.0.254 port 12556
          	WISPr-Bandwidth-Max-Up = 2048
          	WISPr-Bandwidth-Max-Down = 5120
          
          [2.0-RC1][root@xxxyyy.homeunix.org]/var/log(16): ipfw pipe show
          20010:   2.050 Kbit/s    0 ms burst 0 
          q151082 100 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 85546 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail
           sched 85546 type FIFO flags 0x0 0 buckets 1 active
            0 ip           0.0.0.0/0             0.0.0.0/0     2515   186655 99 7266 1806
          20011:   5.120 Kbit/s    0 ms burst 0 
          q151083 100 sl. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 85547 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail
           sched 85547 type FIFO flags 0x0 0 buckets 1 active
            0 ip           0.0.0.0/0             0.0.0.0/0        1       54  0    0   0
          
          

          Sys 2.0-RC1: Intel Atom N330 Dual Core @1.6 2048M Ram 40GHD

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            If you were coming from an older snapshot then you might be seeing this:

            https://rcs.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repos/mainline/commits/2d4003aab1d969ed9ba3e52f2fe3ec083e4bef8c

            We were not calculating the bandwidth received from RADIUS according to the standard. You'll probably have to fix your bandwidth values in your RADIUS server.

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.