Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Pfsense 2.0-BETA4 in Hyper-V: Throughput not as expected

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Virtualization
    4 Posts 2 Posters 7.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      PistolPete
      last edited by

      Hi all,

      I currently run 1.2.3 on an old Watchguard X700.  This is a PIII 1.2Ghz with 256Mb RAM.
      I've been wanting to play with 2.0-BETA4 so I built a Hyper-V VM with 512Mb, 2x Gigabit NICs dedicated to WAN and LAN.

      Other than the weird issue of having to bring the 2 interfaces down and up with a startup script, it all seems to be running fine…... except the throughput.

      I have a 50/1.75Mb cable connection and on the X700 I could easily max my connection.  Now with the VM running (Server is a Quad 2.66Ghz with 8GB RAM and the VHDs on a 4 disk RAID0 of WD Velociraptors) it struggles to hit full speed, and bounces all over the place between 35Mb and about 45Mb.  CPU usage in HyperV never hits more than 5%, in pfsense it never seems to hit 25% (have it allocated a single CPU and ran the uniprocessor hal at install.
      The HyperV server is also hosting 4 other VMs which do not much more than idle 99% of the time!

      Is this to be expected?  I assumed that even though it's a VM that with 2x the RAM and 2x the CPU it should run as well as the X700, or is it that 2.0Beta-4 is having a problem?

      My connection is upgrading to 50/5Mb shortly and I'm looking at moving to 100/10Mb when it's available which wont be too great on the X700 as it only got Fast Ethernet interfaces so was hoping a VM would be a great solution seeing as I have the HyperV server already, but if it struggles with 50Mb I've got no hope with 100Mb!

      Any experience you could share would be helpful.

      Pete

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        PistolPete
        last edited by

        OK - managed to build a second VM with the same virtual hardware and setup 1.2.3, backed up the config from the X700 and restored it to the VM…..throughput is worse than the Beta2.0 VM  :-/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          salida
          last edited by

          @PistolPete:

          Other than the weird issue of having to bring the 2 interfaces down and up with a startup script, it all seems to be running fine…...

          Hey there.. i am having the same problem could you please help me with the script ?
          If i don't bring the interface de1 down and then up it is imposseble to use the wan interface.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            PistolPete
            last edited by

            @salida:

            @PistolPete:

            Other than the weird issue of having to bring the 2 interfaces down and up with a startup script, it all seems to be running fine…...

            Hey there.. i am having the same problem could you please help me with the script ?
            If i don't bring the interface de1 down and then up it is imposseble to use the wan interface.

            I drop and bring up both de0 and de1 and then run the dhcp client on de0 to get my public IP from my cable modem:

            ifconfig de1 down
            ifconfig de0 down
            ifconfig de0 up
            ifconfig de1 up
            dhclient de0

            ….and I saved this as /usr/local/etc/rc.d/startup.sh

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.