Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Unable to open ports

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    22 Posts 4 Posters 9.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D Offline
      Dennisunified
      last edited by

      Got it!!!

      Well. appearantly this is the problem:

      External port range. Only from is configured. this way it does NOT work only when you also (in this case https) set to options to HTTPS for "from" and "to" the forwarding works.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ Offline
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by

        When you click the from, it auto fills the to with the same port.  Why would you of changed the to to other?  Your not forwarding a RANGE, your forwarding a PORT.  So if you changed to to other and then did not put in the other port – yeah it would not really be a valid forward, it would be from 443 to ? (what port)..

        So yeah it would make sense that would be broken

        portforwardfromto.png
        portforwardfromto.png_thumb

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07.1

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D Offline
          Dennisunified
          last edited by

          Thing whas. When i clicked From to lets say HTTP then it auto fills indeed. But when i edit the rule it whas on other again. Changed it back to HTTP at the "To". And it worked.

          But now i have a problem the other way around  ???
          I cant block any ports on my LAN side. I put this rule on the LAN side:

          When i do a port scan with Advanced Port Scanner i see that port 80, 53 and 21 are still open. And netsend results are this:

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • marcellocM Offline
            marcelloc
            last edited by

            What rules you have applied before this rule?

            Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

            Help a community developer! ;D

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ Offline
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by

              Well I can tell you I have edit many a rule, and have never seen it flip the to other??  So not sure what your talking about there.

              As to not being able to block traffic from your lan??  Did you clear you states on pfsense after you made this rule - which is on the lan section of the firewall?

              At a loss to what showing netstat -an from a client has to do with what ports would be open on pfsense or what ports it would allow through its firewall?

              Rules would be processed in order, so if you have a rule above this rule that says allow any, which is the default rules created for the lan.. Then no this rule would never be hit.

              Post up a screenshot of your lan section showing this rule, and then clear your states, etc..  Keep in mind you don't want to lock yourself out of accessing the pfsense gui or ssh, etc.  See the top rule on my lan side.

              lanrules.png
              lanrules.png_thumb

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07.1

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D Offline
                Dennisunified
                last edited by

                Pass. Allow any! For the lan side. When i do that i have internet. When i block i have no connection and cant ping like it supose to work. But when i check the ports they apear open!..

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ Offline
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  What do you mean when you check the ports??  What you showed was a "netstat -an" from some windows client - not from pfsense..

                  What would a firewall rule on pfsense have to do with ports listening on a windows client?

                  "When i block i have no connection and cant ping like it supose to work."

                  What do you think should happen when you block ALL protocols??  What do you think should ping??

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07.1

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C Offline
                    cmb
                    last edited by

                    @Dennisunified:

                    But when i check the ports they apear open!..

                    In netstat in Windows like you showed above? Yeah, they sure will be, no network firewall is going to your Windows system and turn off its services. netstat just shows what your Windows host is listening on, your firewall has 0 control over that.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D Offline
                      Dennisunified
                      last edited by

                      Thanks for the reactions. Indeed i discoverd that netstat does not show ports open on my PFsense… I do have managed to open ports with NAT now.

                      The problem whas that i had to edit the NAT rule and reconfigure the "To" from "other" back to the port i wanted to open! After i edit a rule only then does the rule work!..

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ Offline
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                        last edited by

                        Are you saying that when you create the nat to forward for a specific service, say ftp for example that the rule being generated is wrong?  Ie its saying other or flipping the to other even though from is set to ftp??

                        I find this highly unlikely to be honest – I have created many a port forward, and just recently played with ftp for another thread showing how to create the forwards.  Just added a few for my directv boxes, etc.

                        And have never seen this sort of action.

                        Please post up some images showing what is happening that you have to edit rules to make them work vs them working upon creation.

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07.1

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D Offline
                          Dennisunified
                          last edited by

                          I will this week!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.