• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

"most" Atheros wifi cards work?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Wireless
31 Posts 11 Posters 23.0k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T
    torontob
    last edited by Apr 7, 2012, 8:27 PM

    Thanks for the details wallabybob. Much appreciated.

    I think there has been a surge of people asking for Wireless devices compatible with pfSense. With IPv6 being supported in future release, I think wireless is the weakest point in pfSense now and much need. All other comparable open-source projects do better than pfSense in this area. Partly because of keeping up with the OS updates. I think everyone runs pfSense on pretty good hardware as it's dear to us all but more and more people are deploying it at home and wondering why no proper wireless on it?!

    If anyone else has had good luck in both AP and Infrastructure mode or at least in Infrastructure mode please post it here. I am desparately looking for a USB stick or mini PCI(x) card that supports it.

    Thanks

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • C
      cmb
      last edited by Apr 7, 2012, 8:36 PM

      @torontob:

      Partly because of keeping up with the OS updates.

      No, largely because FreeBSD is so far behind on wireless drivers. Now that Atheros has hired Adrien, one of the guys who was doing a lot of work on it to begin with, that should improve greatly. FreeBSD 9.0 is a tad better with that, but it's such a mess with a number of other things we're far more dependent on than wireless that it doesn't matter, we can't fix its issues in a timely manner, and 2.1 will be released in May. We stick with what's best for the vast majority of uses, wireless is a tiny fraction of users. And it wouldn't matter if wireless did work if 10 other things required for a functional firewall didn't. We don't stay a bit behind the most current releases because we don't care about updating or don't want to, we use the releases that are the best fit for our users' purposes at that time.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by Apr 9, 2012, 7:58 PM

        The wireless N bits in the GUI are there because there is a Marvell wireless card (I have one, using the mwl driver) that supports the N protocols but not N speed rate control. So it's perfectly valid on that card to set it up for N, and it works fine, but will never attain more than G speeds.

        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          torontob
          last edited by Apr 9, 2012, 10:28 PM

          @jimp:

          The wireless N bits in the GUI are there because there is a Marvell wireless card (I have one, using the mwl driver) that supports the N protocols but not N speed rate control. So it's perfectly valid on that card to set it up for N, and it works fine, but will never attain more than G speeds.

          Thanks for the explaination Jimp. What is the model of this Marvell card? Also, does work fine in both AP and Infrastructure mode?

          Best

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by Apr 9, 2012, 10:44 PM

            The card is a Marvell 88W8363. I got a couple off eBay a year or two ago for something like $5-10 each when I saw the mwl driver was doing N already, only to find out about the lack of rate control after I already had them. It supports multi-WAP and multi-Infrastucture, though I did not try those myself (one of the other Devs did). It was supposed to support up to 16 VAPs where the Atheros cards only did 4, but I think in practice it was limited to 8. So you could have 8 APs and 8 client instances all running off that one card.

            Not sure how well that works in actual production, but with limited testing the results were positive.

            Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              torontob
              last edited by Apr 9, 2012, 11:52 PM

              Thanks, very interesting. I have been jumping up and down all over the forum to find a list of working hardware (specially with multiple WAP support but couldn't find any).

              I think it would server right, if a wiki page or a sticky was posted to show the list of current supported hardware with status "Full Support" or "Partial Support".

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by Apr 10, 2012, 12:21 AM

                That's what the spreadsheet is for.
                There are tons of models listed on the second tab.

                But if people want to submit known working chips/models, I'll add them.

                Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by Apr 10, 2012, 11:49 PM

                  Do you know the card model is?
                  WikiDevi lists only 1 miniPCI card with that chip.

                  Steve

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                    last edited by Apr 11, 2012, 12:00 AM

                    No, I don't know the model, the only number anywhere on it that I remember is the chip. Searching on that gives 4-5 results on eBay still though.

                    Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      Efonnes
                      last edited by Apr 18, 2012, 9:24 AM

                      On my cards, I had to make a change to the driver source like the patch on this ticket I posted to get multi-AP mode to actually be useful: http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1104
                      Without that, every AP on the card gets the same BSSID, which makes it impossible to connect to all but one of the hosted APs.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        Doktor Jones
                        last edited by Apr 24, 2012, 3:18 PM

                        @torontob:

                        I think there has been a surge of people asking for Wireless devices compatible with pfSense [โ€ฆ] All other comparable open-source projects do better than pfSense in this area.

                        I'm sorry, but this bit made me smile.  I initially attempted to set up my router-firewall-box as a SmoothWall box, because I'd had prior experience with SmoothWall.  When I went on their forums and asked about wireless support, I literally got laughed at.

                        Back to the topic at hand, if anyone's looking for a wireless Mini PCI-e card to work with their pfSense box, I can recommend the Atheros AR5BXB92 (AR9280 chipset).  It can be had for $15 on eBay, comes in a half-card format for those using book-size systems like myself, and is quite literally plug-and-play.  I plugged it into my box, booted up, logged into the web interface, added a new LAN interface, and the LAN interface popped in, already pointed at ath0.  From there, I just had to configure the LAN interface with the appropriate wireless parameters (SSID, encryption, etc) and was off and running.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          Efonnes
                          last edited by Apr 25, 2012, 2:54 AM

                          If you are comparing to a project like OpenWrt, pfSense is definitely lacking in some wireless features compared to it (802.11n is the most mentioned one, but there are some other things lacking).  OpenWrt is actually a quite capable system with support for lots of different configuration types.  While I don't like how some of its configuration screens are set up in the web GUI, there are also some I do like the way they are set up (in trunk version).  The differences in wireless (at least on ath) may become less in the pfSense version after 2.1, which is probably when the new FreeBSD wireless code will get included.  I don't think it will be available for 2.1, unfortunately.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            Doktor Jones
                            last edited by Apr 25, 2012, 3:15 PM

                            I would consider SmoothWall, IPCop, and the like to be more "comparable" products; full-featured firewall distributions that run on standard x86 architecture.  Of these products, I've found pfSense to have some of the best wireless support.

                            OpenWRT and its kin are designed for embedded systems and (to my knowledge) can't be run on an x86 box, so comparing them to pfSenseโ€ฆ well maybe it's not quite apples and oranges, but it's at least apples and pears.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by Apr 25, 2012, 4:36 PM

                              You can run openwrt and dd-wrt on X86.
                              http://downloads.openwrt.org/backfire/10.03.1-rc6/x86_generic/

                              I've used it for experimental purposes.

                              Steve

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • E
                                Efonnes
                                last edited by Apr 26, 2012, 1:36 AM

                                Last I had tried SmoothWall or IPCop (I'll admit it was a while ago), neither had the kinds of NAT or firewall options that pfSense or OpenWrt have.  That it has x86 support and features overall somewhat comparable to pfSense (especially with some of the optional OpenWrt packages) is why I was comparing it to pfSense.  Note that one thing it does not have is AMD64 support - likely there is little interest in running OpenWrt on computers with lots of memory.

                                btw, OpenWrt is officially with that capitalization now, not OpenWRT, just for reference.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • T
                                  torontob
                                  last edited by May 2, 2012, 5:46 PM

                                  I'm sorry, but this bit made me smile.  I initially attempted to set up my router-firewall-box as a SmoothWall box, because I'd had prior experience with SmoothWall.  When I went on their forums and asked about wireless support, I literally got laughed at.

                                  You probably didn't really look or tested other opensource projects. There are few that do much better than pfSense in wireless department but again pfSense is my choice and I want it to better - no wait, be the BEST. It's important to compare feature by feature and not overall or other features when deciding at enhancements. Anyhowโ€ฆ.minor details are not important.

                                  Have you tried the Atheros AR5BXB92 with multiple AP and Infrastructure modes? Can you please post what is the maximum of each supported? By the way, is this the a/b/g/n card like this one:
                                  http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Apple-Atheros-AR9280-AR5BXB92-802-11AGN-Mini-Pci-e-Wifi-300Mbp-dual-band-N-card-/250915087322?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3a6bb463da#ht_3406wt_1185

                                  Jimp: The card you were referring to is this one?:
                                  http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Marvell-88W8363-Mini-PCI-Wireless-Card-300Mbps-802-11N-/230614780239?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item35b1b6494f#ht_2033wt_986

                                  ^^^^ Seems like a Chinese replica if I am not wrong.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J
                                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                    last edited by May 2, 2012, 5:54 PM

                                    Yeah that's the card. Mine came on the slow boat from China but it did work. Looked like the two I got were system pulls, not "new" knock-offs.

                                    Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • T
                                      torontob
                                      last edited by May 2, 2012, 6:07 PM

                                      The cards listed here with same chip have an extra 2nd chip as well. What does that mean? Would that be a problem if I opt for one from Apple, Samsung, CyberTAN, or Buffalo. All show no drivers for Linux.

                                      Thanks

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • J
                                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                        last edited by May 2, 2012, 6:21 PM

                                        Not sure really, I just grabbed two that had the 88Wโ€ฆ. chip and they were both OK, though I don't have any in production.

                                        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                          [[user:consent.lead]]
                                          [[user:consent.not_received]]